Total Field Theory

Yes, that is true. However, the fact that I am the type who would bother to read the material being discussed also makes me the type to read about the consensus theories until I basically understand them from the persepective of a layman science enthusiast. I didn't find anything in the book that could be said to have been falsified by scientific experimentation or data. On the other hand, much of the content diverges from the consensus interpretation of experiments and data.

It is true, the thread was placed in Pseudoscience Sub-forum, and that might be why the "powers that were" felt they could dismisss it without reading it. As far as I know, except for me, no one in that thread actually read the book. The premise itself was simply enough for them to wage the attack. The possibility that such a premise could not be falsified made it all the more appropriate to attack without being informed of the content. Thus those who waged the disparagement were anxious to make it clear that they did not read it.

Just like then, my guess it that this thread will not get any meaningful discussion about science, or what we know and don't know about the observed forces, unless people like you and me lead the discussion. This is an opportunity for those setting out to learn the consensus theories to see what loop holes might exist that they could focus on in an attempt to understand the forces of nature.

When Farsight said it is "cry-wolf clutter" like this that gets in the way of scientific progress, he was being short sighted. He mentioned the consensus theory of gravity but failed to go the next step of saying what the observable mechanics of that theory are, and he didn't point out the passage in the linked material that his description falsifies.

As far a Read-Only's statement that "no such right angles exist", I thought that the electric and magnetic fields propagated at right angles to each other, but I could be wrong.

Either way, some good links to the details of their objections to the subject link would be educational.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"As far a Read-Only's statement that "no such right angles exist", I thought that the electric and magnetic fields propagated at right angles to each other, but I could be wrong."

You're not wrong at all, QW.

There is only one geometric definition for dimensions and that's a progression of right angles from a geometric point (zero dimensions); right angle (90o) motion out of the geometric (0) point generates a one dimensional straight line. Right angle motion from the Straight Line generates Two Dimensional Plane. Right angle motion from Two Dimensional Plane generates Three Dimensions, occupied or unoccupied by matter. Right Angle motions from Three Dimensional Solid or Space generates Fourth Dimension of Space-Time (hyphenated because 3-D Space moves at right angles to itself, generating 4th D, and motion is synonymous with time and conversely).

The conceptual fly in the 4-D ointment is not so much a failure to recognized that 'static' 3-D matter is actually moving 4-Dimensionally at right angles to itself, but more a tenacious refusal to accept that inescapably manifest fact even on the many occasions that the prevailing 4-D ubiquitous condition is (inevitably) encountered. The scientific status quo alleges to 'acknowledge' Einstein's proof that the physical universe is 4-Dimensional: as long as it doesn't get in the way of their 3-dimensional big bang gang consensus and all of the primitive, archaically entrenched 3-D dogmas that wag their tails behind it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes, we encounter or experience gravity at every instant. What you characterize as a failure to recognize that 3-D matter is moving 4-dimensionally, to me is more a failure to explain the "how" of gravity as defined by the current theory. If there is a point in spacetime where/when the presence of a particle or object is observed, and if we can rightly determine where/when that particle or object well probably be in the future based on the consensus theory, then why not just say how that object (a group of bound particles) will traverse the space from where it is now, to where it can accurately be predicted to be in the future, in terms of the known forces at the quantum level.

Think of the Moon revolving around the Earth; we know what time it will rise above the horizon at any point on Earth. What are the physics of the motion of the Earth and Moon, particle by particle at a quantum level? How can the motion of the macro object be described in terms of the energy quanta involved? There is no such physics that I am aware of, and so any sentence that states that the cause of gravity has been revealed by GR is an incomplete sentence. What has been revealed is a very accurate theory that cannot be explained physically at the quantum level.

It is easy to say that the classical theories give us an accurate enough answer, but don't try to say that about motion at relativistic velocities. Then the theory is rolled out, revealing a universe characterized by relative time dilation and distance contraction. Why not put those concepts in terms of energy density differences encountered by objects in relative motion to each other based on the premise that motion of an object through the medium of space increases the energy density of the object and locality that is deemed to be in motion (in motion relative of an object considered at rest). It is well known that motion through the CMB is detectible by a temperature difference vs. an object at rest relative to the background radiation. Why don't we have a discussion about how those two concepts, energy density differences of objects in relative motion, and motion of any object through the CMB, are not governed by the same science?

Lol, I have to laugh, but surely you will admit that even those comfortable with the status quo have not abandoned the search for unification of the existing consensus theories. They just don't like the quality and tone of some laymen level discussions on that topic in what they sometimes like to hold out as "hard science" sub-forums. But then the same guys will say that they never check out the alternative forums and proudly proclaim that they didn't read Total Field Theory. It really was a fun read, but maybe a bit too "in your face" for the common Status Quo-er.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What are you talking about? The scientific community realizes we live in a 4D universe and the big bang was 4D.

 

Dear origin:
You have just proclaimed "The scientific community (which, as a figure of speech, is a non-sequitur, i.e., there is a heck of a lot of in-ranks disagreement on very rudimentary issues: 'the scientific community' is not a harmonious domicile of happy campers) realizes we live in a 4-D universe and the big bang was 4D"...

The original presentation of the big bang, back in the early 60s is hardly recognizable today. Moreover, even from its outset, it was planted on the trembling turf of 'background radiation' as an alleged 'proof' that there was (or is) 'a beginning', from which the observed (unanticipated) expanding universe, expands...

Fred Hoyle was being interviewed on a New York City radio station when he fathered the term 'big bang beginning': in jest. The joke, as everyone has learned since: stuck... Neither has it lost its entertainment value. (Hey. The BBT has been mathematically traced back to where it endos out with the convergence of all spatial expansion attending a jamboree in the same extremely small space: and then goes Bang(!) in a perfectly computed extremely small second of time (making a nanosecond look like a sidereal year? What is more comprehensively accommodated in the simple intersection of any expanding system back-tracked to it's geometrical beginning) and commences what we know observe to be the (spatially) expanding universe'...

Well. In a series of discoveries beginning in the mid 70s - and many more confirmations since - we have measured a ubiquitously accelerating - expanding universe. This writer wrote, copyrighted and published this prediction 53 years ago, in three languages.

There are a variety of band aids patching up the (once again) unexpected fact that not only is the universe expanding, moreover, the expansion is accelerating. That 'original explosion' has been promoted many times to become unlike any other explosive dynamic known anywhere else in or out of the classroom. The cosmological cosmetics 'experts' have since plastered tuck & trims all over the face of 'cosmology'.

Seizing the spiritual moment: Green's 'String Theory' found a compatible place to hang itself on innumerable - Mother & Father - sky hooks, ever since.

('Theoretical Physics' has taken off and designed a brand new air sickness bag?)

Hoyle was a Steady State guy and with Bondi and Gold, the three of them had a really beautiful scientific explanation for everything macrocosmically spatial, except the 'inevitable' thinning out of the average density in an expanding universe. Their desperately jury-rigged 'spontaneous creation of hydrogen', to compensate for what would otherwise disqualify the Steady State universe (isn't supposed to thin out, but rather, remain about the same density, past, present and future) was reluctantly abandoned (because it does in fact contradict the Law of Conservation of MassEnergy) and the ad hoc big bang gang won the day and ever since...

However: as mentioned earlier, the original presentation of the big bang existed apart from what has since become a very peculiar habit of borrowing a lot of Einstein's 4-D cosmology, particularly 'Lambda': which is the beating heart of Einstein's ('abandoned') Steady State Unified Field. No one (but Truly Yours) is calling it a double-talking theft.

Refer, having your soup and dog paddling in it also.

Does anyone care to talk about this?

Summarily for the moment, referencing the BBT's originally pivotal reliance on 'background radiation', when a Steady State model is back-tracked in 4-Dimensions, it doesn't 'end-game' in the intersection of microcosmically retroactive expansion. No. It keeps on getting smaller (in 4 dimensions) forever (refer, Steady State); without any (3-dimensionally presumptuous, pinch hitting) intersecting 'end' - where the BBT 'begins'.

That is to say, origin, that you - and your entire BBT school of thought - consistently say(s) that you acknowledge and recognize the 4D ST Continuum. But: you don't...

 

Hi guys.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Question:

Could it be possible/probable that the Dark Energy and Dark Matter states/processes represent the very same 'spontaneous creation of (eventually becoming) baryonic matter'; and that such 'Dark' processes only occur in ultra cold, deep, energy-space conditions?


I would be interested to read all views, amateur, professional, layman and so-called 'crank/eccentric' regarding the possibility/hypothesis or some other in similar vein?

Thanks. Will read through in a few days to see what has transpired. Cheers!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Undefined:

Genuinely good to see you here.

Of course its possible, sir (or Ma'am, as the case may be).

We'd have to keep in mind that the existence and quality of 'Dark matter' is on probation.

But it certainly has - not at all necessarily contrary - possibilities.

Keeping in mind that, like black holes and a lot of other stuff that may or not be 'out there': we haven't firmed it up yet. Lots of hammers but few nails and only one of the hammers works and we aren't sure which one, if we have such a hammer at all. Other than that we're a flock of golden boys and girls...

 

Nobel prizes aren't awarded for new things -- they are awarded for new and better things where "better" means more than aesthetically pleasing to you.

So by invoking the Nobel prize at this stage in discussion is premature to the point of making you seem very silly.

 

In classical electromagnetism, electric and magnetic fields in an electromagnetic wave propagates forward and these are orthogonal (at right angles to each other and the direction of propagation)

As for electromagnetism being manifestation of geometry of some higher dimensional spacetime, Michael Kaku wrote this bookhttp://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33426.Hyperspace

However, not all mainstream physicists like string theory because it is so difficult to falsify, despite the elegant maths
For me, 3 years ago I embraced the basic idea of string theory (At that time I did not have the maths required to read it in detail though), but over these 3 years, the LHC keep came up with results that constrain Supersymmetry, thus my view about string theory become less optimistic (given how many versions of string theory requires Supersymmetry)

e.g.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121113095018.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131219142311.htm
https://www.google.com.hk/search?es...12.0....0...1c.1.35.serp..9.8.988.coev1PTPuN8 (google for more)

While it is good that the LHC and other experiment seemed to suggest that the Standard Model describes the particles and forces very well, it makes it harder to explain things like dark matter and dark energy

As for the Big Bang Theory, I only vaguely recall that I read in some science reference books (when I was little) how spacetime begins at the back bang, thus the big bang is 4 dimensional spacetime. More modern theories that account for the beginning of the universe include the cyclic models which I mainly learnt about them in pop science magazines such as NewScientist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_model

As for anything else, particularly gravity, I did not know enough to comment or contribute anything about it in this thread

 

That seems like a strange post, unless you just misinterpreted that statement, "Nobel Prize material for sure". You realize he was referring to the phrase "Tough shit", that was part of someone's comments about that previous thread being closed, or some such thing, right?

 

I could not source the purported quote. But if he thinks Nobel prizes are handed out for forum posts, he remains "very silly" in my estimation.

 

Uh, OK. I guess I thought I did but you apparently know what I think better than me.

Did you recently ingest any hallucinogenic drugs by chance? Well at least this silliness is in the right section of the forum now.

You, Undefined and quantum_wave can enjoy yourselves in this little fantasy world you are creating. Have fun mates.

 

Ohhhhhhh. True, sorry, I though you misunderstood what he was referring to as Nobel Prize material. I guess you are right if what you meant was he would have to be silly to think that prizes were awarded for forum posts. That would make him very silly, ... but who would think for a moment that he wasn't just being factious?

 

Really, origin, all I did was post a question prompted by an aside/comment regarding Hoyle et al's old conjecture, as follows...

...and you immediately think it ok to denigrate my innocent (and on-topic and respectful involvement in a conversation) in that 'personal' and prejudicial fashion you did above?

What is it that drives you to make such silly trash talk and irrelevant opinion post in this instance, if not trollish intent to personalize a thread for your own personal reasons having no justification for that in this instance?

Next time please read before kneejerking and mouthing off trashing someone where it is unwarranted by the facts in evidence, as in this instance. It will help everyone.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Are you sure? Perhaps the 4th dimension is a temporal result of the persistence of the 3 spatial dimensions. Time cannot exist independently.

 

Well. The time has come, the walrus said, to speak of many things...

Dear Hearts: QW, Write4you, Wellwisher, Secret and all other likewise resonating Hearts: here's looking at you, while hoping somebody up there likes us. Certainly including the potpourri of Moderators of this magnificent forum. A hard rain is way overdue, and here's a matching post once again looking at you.

In the immortal words of Jimi Hendrix, I got a hummin' bird, hum so loud, he make you think you losin' yo mind:

('If you aren't out of your mind: it isn't true love.' - God <Carpe Diem> )

Great Continental EuroAsian Green Grass River Dragon *Productions
Ordu of the Aegis: Thu Doh Lion-Dog
(*A subsidiary of Cold Steel Enterprise Presentations):

******************************************
All Introductory information about Einstein's work, as listed here (immediate below),
is presented in more expansive detail at corresponding titles of ‘TOTAL FIELD THEORY Scrbd’, and, here on the Sciforums.com (Formerly Delphi), and, in a more condensed presentation of the Einstein related subjects as well as several other documentary subjects on the causes, effects and possible remedies of domestic violence (the fastest growing violent crime in the United States; namely physical violence against women and children, by adult men, as related to international warfare), and, one 'Novel Journal', on the menu at:

Total Field Theory

http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

--------------------------

http://forums.delphiforums.com/subedai
(Nomads, Civilization & War)
--------------------------------------------
http://forums.delphiforums.com/waboose2/
(Butterfly, Owl & Eagle: Athena Marie Prima
- A Novel/Journal)

*************************

THE HISTORY & EVOLUTION OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE
• An Abbreviated Anthological Narrative
• By K. B. Robertson
• ..............................................
•
• Einstein's 1) Special 2) General & 3) Unified Field theories of Relativity.
• .......................................
•
• 1) 1906. Subjecting light (electromagnetism) and uniform velocity.
• ..................................
•
• 2) 1916. Subjecting gravity (unidentified) and non-uniform velocity (acceleration).
• ........................................
•
• 3) 1927. Presently abandoned; herein reinstated
• Unified Field - dedicated to finding the Special & General Theorys of Relativity, two apparently different phenomena, actually having the same (so far unrecognized) causal identity.
• ...............................................
•
• The 4th, 5th & 6th dimensions of gravity, electricity & magnetism. Steady State vs Big Bang. The philogistic warps, woofs and 'waveicles' of 'Quantum Entanglement': EPR appended - Higgs-Bosun, Eaton collapsation, Copenhagen interpretaton translated Quantum Mechanics.
• .......................................
• PROLOGUE
• EINSTEIN’S presently abandoned UNIFIED FIELD - Steady State -THEORY:
Reinstated, without mathematics.
• Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism
• are the 4th, 5th & 6th Dimensions.
• The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong
• Entropic 'Heat Death' is a Myth
•
*Copyright © December 1999 by K. B. Robertson
•
(*Previous copyrights © 1959, '60, '66, '70, '79 '85.)
By K. B. Robertson
•
• Public Internet/Web access *forum.
(*A public place or medium for open discussion. May be used for profit free public education and entertainment with appropriate credits for original authorship.)
•
Anyone here may contribute whatever disagreement or validation they choose.
• A modest but irrevocable ten and more thousands of readers of this (Six Edition, sold out) fifty+ year copyrighted and small press published reinstatement of Einstein's Unified Field w'out mathematics (The New Gravity / Gravity Is The 4th Dimension/Total Field Theory) have shared this remarkable recognition and often added to it.
•
• In lieu of it's unlikely disqualification, this contribution to physical science isn't on the net-web to test the waters. The work is well known to an acknowledged limited, relatively modest international audience.
•
• It has yet to be disqualified, only augmented and further confirmed. Because this work is based upon and authenticated by specific benchmark facets of the - previously unrecognized elements within - foundations of contemporary theoretical physics:
Disqualification doesn't seem likely, but would resolve rather than introduce problems. The sincere reader will find non religiously affiliated, empirically established absolute retribution here; not without moral and legal justice.
•
• If indeed this is a revolution in physics - and it is precisely that until if and when it is disqualified, it is much more than a physical science revolution of vast repercussive proportions. It is also the uncovering of a sheepishly concealed socio-political morass, comparable to the observations of the impact of bellicose barbarian nomads on civilization, some 800 and more years ago... In the decryptifying words of H. G. Wells, in THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY:
•
"Whenever civilization seems to be choking amidst its weeds of wealth and debt and servitude, when its faiths seen rotting in cynicism and its powers of further growth are hopelessly entangled In effete formulae, the nomad drives in like a plough to break up the festering stagnation and release the world to new beginnings.” - H.G. Wells, THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY, p.666 (Yes. That's what page it is really on. Yeppers.) Copyright c 1920-21 by McMillan Co.

Raymond Postgate grotesquely omits the above paragraph in his 'Revised Up-date' of Wells' above-quoted, unrevised history book. Postgate may in fact have been commissioned by his publisher to 'revise & update' Well's magnificent contribution to history: just so that the cited insidious surgical omission could be carried out...

Preceding Postgate's omission is *TRIANGLE Book Publisher's 1940-’41 'revised & enlarged' edition of H.G. Well's THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY, Volume II; which likewise makes the exact same surgical omission of the exact same paragraph; in this *case on page 699. Dear Reader may only draw his or her own conclusions as to why - in each cited case - the omission is made ...

The cited publishers are very attracted to reproducing Wells’ magnificent book (THE OUTLINE OF HISTORY), but equally bound for commissioning revisionists to consistently and surgically exclude the ‘nomadic stigma' - the record's obligatory critical observation... The revisionary trespassers quite apparently offended by the above quoted paragraph, by H.G.Wells... And, so it is overduely noted. Herein.
•
• The same vagarious consortium of 'historical revisionism' has swamped theoretical physics; especially in the past four and more decades... Converting what was - and is still mistakenly entitled and considered - the most objective and stringent of scientific methods, to what amounts to a miscellany of of Wish Sandwiches (If we had two slices of rye and some ground hogs knuckle, we could divide it into thirds and make breakfast, lunch and dinner) accompanied by a triple Martini with as many hammerhead, mako, and gray sharks cavorting in the smugly swirling Vermouth.
•
John Stuart Mill reserves approximately the same, albeit more solemn, reprimand.

"If civilization has got the better of barbarism when barbarism had the world to itself, it is too much to profess to be
afraid lest barbarism, after having been fairly got under, should revive and conquer civilization...

• A civilization (*or science) that can thus succumb to its vanquished enemy (*non-recognition of - often patent refusal to recognize - existing solutions to popularly alleged and labeled 'intractable problems'); must first have become so degenerate, that neither its appointed priests and teachers, nor anyone else, has the capacity, or will take the trouble, to stand up for it. ..

• ...If this be so, the sooner such a civilization receives notice to quit, the better. It can only go on from bad to worse until destroyed and regenerated (like the Western Empire, i.e., Europe) by energetic barbarians (*Socio-politically oppressed solutions to allegedly dissolute, 'unresolvable', ersatz 'enigmas).”• - * John Stuart Mill, ON LIBERTY, p.p. 136-37, Copyright 1859 (*A long celebrated, world class historian.)

The settings are different, but the applied dynamic principles - and lack of them - are the same.

• The featured work in theoretical physics has been confined to small press production and distribution, for logistic and especially political reasons intruding in the sanctuary of intrigue and duplicity saturated (Jabberwock) post Einsteinian science.
•
• As long as Theoretical Physics can be compromised: anything can be compromised. (Refer, 'tolerance threshold expansion'.)
• Generally controlled wider avenues of communication deprive the public from even an opportunity to know of and consider the non-mathematical perspective of Einstein's work, which empowers non-scientifically educated people to understanding what is professionally labeled as non-mathematically 'incomprehensible' and 'unimaginable'.
•
• Meanwhile, the universal gravitation bonded cosmos prevails. An existentially indifferent vehicle of edification, more powerful than money, politics, sex, violence, mental telepathy and/or war.
•
• More powerful than the corporate state, or destructive, digressive or diversionary elements of 'mainstream media'. Empowering everyone (the so called 'great unwashed - methodologically exploited and disempowered masses') : beyond commerce, politics, guns, gold, extortion or intimidation.
•
• Apparently why the mainstream media and the rogue corporate state that controls it has 'ignored' amd 'omitted' (oppressed; censored) this work for over forty years - why it was much more obscurely known until it recently appeared on the internet/web (Which is an ongoing story of itself).
•
• A simple matter of recognizing what's long proven on the foundations of physical science, that gravity may move in the opposite direction - as a repelling, pushing force, as well as pulling force of attraction - non-mathematically offered in Newton's Preface to the Principia Mathematica.
This 'gravitational alternative' relates directly to Einstein's General Principle Of Relativity.
•
• Gravity is found in the dual role of a pulling force at long distances, and a pushing force on or near the surface of the material system from which it originates.
• Newton first offered it as a possibility; Einstein firstly confirmed that gravity is indeed acceleration - a pushing force, as clarified in the issued, unprecedented recognition of these long historied facts.
• Nature at large only confirms the previously unrecognized points at issue. There's not much here to be argued, though arguments are welcome. A matter of better understanding what you already knew about.
•
• The Big Bang theory ignores the 4th dimension because it disqualifies the Big Bang - 'creationist beginning' theory. The Big Bang is the status quo, and the status quo is politics, glibly eclipsing scientific method.

Steady State open range may be metaphorically strange, but barbed wire is an intrusively man-made boundary.
•
• There are no macrocosmic or microcosmic ends or beginnings; no physical boundaries. No absolute surfaces. A universe without Einstein's 4th dimension of time is a universe bereft of motion of any kind. Einstein united space ‘and’ time to find them ‘space-time’. Time is a moving proposition and all three recognized dimensions of space, says Einstein, must perforce move with time.
• There seems to be a scientific consensus acknowledging the fourth dimension of time, but there is definitely a complete absence of recognition of how that dimension manifests in or otherwise relates to reality in the existential and/or human experience.
• Space may be generally amorphous (not counting the structure of ubiquitous electromagnetism); nearly empty, or occupied by ‘particles’ of matter (charges of electricity having no discontinuous surfaces) ranging from thin air to extremely dense considerations such as U-238, or the core of Jupiter or the Sun (for local examples).
•
• Note that Einstein is most lauded - and least understood - in Theoretical Physics as it applies to astronomy, geology, metallurgy and all physical extensions of nearly empty space (‘There is no space empty of field’. - Einstein. Therefore there is no altogether empty space), which there’s plenty of even in the most dense manifestations of matter.
• Einstein found all of occupied and unoccupied space to be four dimensional, and to have been four dimensional all along without having previously been recognized. Certainly the unrecognized four dimensional dynamic is ubiquitous - not being a question of where it is, but unexpectedly challenging its audience to consider the problem of finding a space that is not (conspicuously) four dimensionally dynamic (- all of the known, though incompletely understood -) effects of gravity.
•
• Perhaps an attendance of this forum will show the error of what so far proves to be conclusive, previously unrecognized evidence that Newton's gravity, in concordance with time, is Einstein's 4 dimensional space-time continuum. More likely that this work will grow, as it has in the past, with the contributions of its readers. Any given reader may find affirmation - perhaps disqualifying contradiction - that this author's not even thought - or dreamed - of.
•
• Note: EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHYSICS 101 is a title copyrighted and published in 1979; inspired by a reader of a previous edition of *GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION, asking if it's possible that evolved extraterrestrials know * that...

• The author replied (in a copyrighted publication, the 5th, 601 page edition of this work) that he thinks it may be the 1st college course in ET physics - Extraterrestrial Physics 101. The question inspired the response and the response became the title of the 5th - copyright 1979 - edition of Gravity Is The 4th Dimension.
•
• Entire cities and populations are witness to this. Like The New Gravity: Is The 4th Dimension, EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHYSICS 101 has been 'borrowed' by numerous others; sprinkled all over the internet / web since early 2000; held out as original work, excluding this original author.

• Some filchers are recently on the net, saying 'Gravity Is The 4th Dimension' is 'stolen from Einstein'.

Particularly interesting, because this is being said by vainly motivated boucaniers who are boldly attempting to steal it from this author.
(Imitation is the highest form of compliment, unless it graduates to gross plagiarization, and worse...)

• Ergo, Einstein 'stole' ('mirrored-derorrim') his work from Michelson & Morley, Maxwell stole his work from Faraday and Hertz, in a chain of poaching by Newton, Kepler, Copernicus, Aristophanes, who stole the work of Democritus, and so on.

• Meanwhile, Newton clarified: "If I have seen further than others, it is because I stand on the shoulders of giants."
•
Discoveries are validated, or disqualified, by relating to preceding discoveries - and discoverers.

• Were it not for the contributions of Einstein, Maxwell, Newton, Copernicus, and so many others, this author would not have realized Newton's gravity is Einstein's 4-D space-time continuum; would not have demystified and reinstated Einstein’s abandoned Unified Field Theory, or recognized electricity is the 5th dimension, and magnetism the 6th; would not have been able to explain the cause of ‘time dilation’, 'non-absolute space', 'non-absolute time', the translation of 'space and time' to 'space-time', or been empowered to further disprove the already self-disqualified Big Bang Theory (is wrong). Could not have disqualified the ‘entropic heat death’ falsely said to be the fate of the universe (*Jeremy Rifkin has authored some superbly edifying books, but *ENTROPY is not among them), could not have comprehensively accounted for the C of 'Celeritas Constant, or resurrected the Steady State Theory, or explained the causality of so called 'black holes'.
•
• All of this news is based on the simple recognition of long established, previously unrecognized facts. The authenticity of this series of unprecedented - new - recognitions and discoveries is based on the - old - cornerstones of Modern Physics. With that important qualification, there’s nothing new about any of this. As it irrevocably must be.•

Copyrights and small press publications of GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION go back to 1959, '69, '79 & '99. When anyone comes up with a copyright - and hundreds of thousands of readership witnesses all over the world - preceding 1959, then it’s rightfully theirs. Otherwise such variously motivated aspirants are more a source of entertainment than edification.
•
• The discoveries of this record are -have been and continue to be - there for anyone to realize, with or without the influence of this charted course of discoveries. Whereas, under the long time published circumstances, imitation is more a likelihood than coincidence, and the former is the highest form of compliment. Except when the imitation graduates to contrived plagiarization, when the contriving pretender knowingly excludes the name of the original author.

•Apart from imposing plagiarism, intrusive pretenders, brigands, boucaniers and sundry dissenters breathing air way over their pay grade, like misanthropes are also found proclaiming the author has 'satanistically turned gravity upside down.'

•While Newton and Einstein offer that the popular perspective of gravity may be upside down, as when the pre Copernican world geocentrically perceived the universe as revolving around the earth, instead of illusion caused by the earth's rotation.

•'Truth is a sword, only to those who deny it.' - Anon.

•Speaking of 'upside down and backwards' - the most popular
form of satanism...
Question. Who 1st said: "You can't beat the devil"?

(Don't answer right away, now?)

•Whereas, Einstein's achievements "...beckon like a liberation."

...............................

Total Field Theory: Reinstatement of Cosmological Constant & Steady State Theories

Quote Originally Posted by the unify View Post

"I'm not trying to state the obvious, but since you have had a difficult time in the publishing and promotional areas of scientific work do you suppose you could provide us with a few pointers? For instance is it a good idea to send your work to physicists or is it enough to post it and let them come to you?"

Dear Unify:
In my experience, it's a good idea to post work and not concern yourself with a 'community' of conflicting ideas, thoughts and (so called) theories. There's a heap of 'in-fighting' underway 'in-ranks', and 'outsiders' are also a serious threat to established reputations.

Theoretical physics is in a highly confused and utterly contentious transition in this era. You will note that there is a culminating (if coy and camouflaged) return to Einstein's formerly abandoned work. (The 'expanding universe' is Accelerating...)

This trend, i submit, will continue, and, Einstein's formerly abandoned Unified Field (Cosmological Constant) will be reinstated, as I predicted in published, copyrighted and distributed manuscripts (in three languages) more than fifty five years ago.

The State Motto of New Hampshire is 'Live Free or Die.'
______________

6 June 1944:

“From this day to the ending of the world. We in it shall be remembered. We few. We happy few. We band of brothers. For he today that sheds his blood with me, shall be my brother.” - Band of Brothers.

“I am the kit fox. I live in uncertainty. If there is anything difficult. If there is anything dangerous to do. That is mine.” – Sioux warrior’s song.

“You can’t be the one. There is only one of you.” – Last words of a rat-pack bond.

“You can fall all the way, and be on top: when you’re a Nazi.” – Einstein

“Never go to war. Especially against yourself. Most people don’t realize that’s exactly what a lot of countries including the United States are doing.” – Excerpt, neo-documentary, Lord of War

“You’re standing on Holy ground. Here, space joins with time.” – Parsival, the opera.

The stage of the firearms trafficking throughout the planet is set and based on the history of two World Wars – I and II, the ends of which commenced a new beginning in small arms enterprise & (especially in small arms light infantry assault weapons - mobility & affordability) trade. The stockpile of World War generated small arms is financially and politically staggering. Quite literally the entire world’s civilized governments are completely compromised at all levels with the profits made from large and small weapons and the industries that maintain them. Of course an updated part of this scenario is continued manufacturing, marketing, and the all-important need for more conflict…

North and West Africa is not the only place for this commerce, but it may be the most fertile place. Especially certain parts of it are undeveloped, ungoverned, anarchistic war lord states. War lords are often in contention for the same territory, placing the impoverished population between conflicting interests. Uncounted masses of innocent poor people suffer unspeakable atrocities. Such coordinates are prime locations for weapons entrepreneurs doing business with ‘private armies’. Because such locations are geophysically remote from civilization, they harbor social chaos; anarchy prevails and is capitalized upon. And few people care…

Liberia/Rwanda is a terrible African model of the described, genocidally inundated social catastrophe. Again, the general population is impoverished and uneducated and no one cares. Child soldiers are trained by war lords to wield automatic weapons, snort cocaine and gun powder and violently resist any obstruction or opposition against incumbent war lords. Of course the child warriors are completely expendable. They are very remote from civilization geographically and demographically and very few people and/or organizations have the motivation or wherewithal to intervene; especially against the enormous money invested in and profited from the described, incumbent status quo. – K.B. Robertson, Excerpt, ON VIOLENCE

“We spent so much money on defense that the USSR couldn’t keep up. That’s how we won the arms race and Cold War. It’s a good thing I guess.” – International Law professor.

“Newly independent former Soviet Republic governments like the Ukraine stock pile AK47s and have their own arms industry. They started as a fledgling country with very few economic highs; without regulations yet. It became a sport for dealers and brokers to go spend a little money to get some weapons that they could transfer to the conflict regions and the Ukrainians were certainly going to do that because they needed the cash.

“Small arms weapons are produced in over 90 countries; there’s about 1,200 factories that manufacture small arms weapons – they’re trade/currency around the world in virtually every country. Although there are a variety of favored weapons the AK-47 is by far the most favored form of weapons currency. Small arms trade is about 4 billion $ on the legal side, and about 1 billion $ on the black market side. That’s annual figures of course. This is not about legal military budgets supporting established national and UN armies, air forces and navies. That’s a whole other ball game.” – Documentary excerpt, Lord of War

“There are over 600 million small arms in traffic around the world. Nearly 250 million of these are in the United States. Basically enough for every man, woman and child. There’s 30 million inAfrica. 80 million in Europe. But the small arms in Africa effect a lot more people in many different, predominantly genocidal ways in Africa. Perhaps moreso than all other places combined.” – Documentary excerpts, Lord of War.

The good, bad and ugly consensus on the most valuable small arms model – and the most solvent international currency - is by far a standing applause for the Russian originated AK-47 Assault Rifle with a selector switch for Full and Semi-automatic fire. Here’s an information package on it (written by a Russian translator):

“The AK-47 was designed by Russian soldier Mikhail Temafeyevich Kalashnikov in 1941 while nursing a battle wound to his arm. Kalashnikov used the six month recuperation period to read all the books on firearms he could get his hands on. With help from friend, Zhenya Krauchenko, his submachine gun design developed for a new gas operated rifle based on the M3 cartridge. In 1946 the Main Artillery Commission approved the drawing and Kalashnikov was given merit to produce various prototypes. In 1949 , after repeated changes and slow progress the Soviet Army accepted one of Kalashnikov’s standard type rifles. The AK-47 (Automat Kalashnikova Obrazets 1947) was the standard rifle for the Soviet Military until the AKM and still holds the reputation as the most reliable battle rifle ever. Between 30 & 50 million copies & variations of the AK-47 have been produced worldwide, making it the most widely used rifle in the world.” – Documentary excerpt, Lord of War

“While private gun runners continue to thrive, the world’s biggest arms suppliers are (respectively) the U.S., U.K., Russia, France & China. They are also the five permanent members of the UN Security Counsel.” – Ibid

“You know who’ going to inherit the earth? Arms dealers, because everybody else is too busy killing each other.” – Nicolas Cage, Lord of War

“They say evil prevails when good men fail to act. What they oughtta say is just, ‘Evil prevails’.” – Ibid

“Never go to war against biological reptiles; especially yourself.” - Ibid


Any portion of this missive, or whatever communications directly connected to it, may be used without restrictions, for any genuine charity or motive of public education, or entertainment, with appropriate accreditations for original authorship.



(Pax:
A period of peace and general stability in international affairs under the influence of <peace-keeping> dominant military power; usually used in combination with a Latinized name.)

 

That was a very interesting read. But I fail to see how it solves the formation of basic elements and the evolution of the universe itself.

If space is expanding outward, where and what did it expand from?

Yes, Einstein was speaking about spacetime. But is spacetime infinite? Is there a condition beyond our apparently expanding space which is not bounded and has no properties to measure? The condiition which allowed the Inflationary Epoch to occur in the first place. The absence of space? The absence of SOL restriction? The absence of gravity? The absence of time?
As I understand it, all physical laws came about after the Inflationary Epoch, an unaccountable condition, where everything appears to have happened at the same time , in the same place. Like a mega quantum event, releasing all universal energy at once in all directions.

It just struck me that if we draw a circle from a center (t0), representing all the points with a spacetime coordinate t1, 1 second away from the center, then, if we stand on opposite sides of the circle, the space between our t1 coordinates represents 2 seconds, even as only 1 second has elapsed for each of us. And of course at opposite ends of spacetime we are moving apart at twice the rate each of us is experiencing.

 

Your correct description of the doubled rate of recession from opposite sides of a common point is directly applicable to a known fact about the 'optical horizon'. Wherein the speed of light is exceeded by the ever accelerating distance between two given points of observation resulting in a threshold of limitation on how far the surrounding universe from any given point of observation may be observed, by radio telescope or the unaided human eye. As you say, that's an interesting consideration.

You speak of 'The Inflationary Epoch'. With due respect to you, Write4, my school of thought does not recognize - has no real reason to recognize - any kind of 'beginning', or any kind of 'ending', including what I consider the complete, presumptuous 'inevitability' of any kind of 2nd Thermodynamic Law required 'entropic heat death'.

It's the 4-D space time continuum in either direction - past/present/ future: to infinity. Steady State.

The Universe at any given moment: in situ. Squared: past & present. Larger in the future, smaller in the past: squared.

 

The more you write, the less you say. How is that possible?

 

Easy. Don't you get it?

"The Universe at any given moment: in situ. Squared: past & present. Larger in the future, smaller in the past: squared."

Indubitably...

Edited to add disclaimer: This was sarcasm.