A most compelling UFO video

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by Trapped, Jan 17, 2014.

  1. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    At 6.02 another object on the far right appears to fall, not by the same distance completely but it is seen to fall then settle into a position.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Also judging the weather conditions of the surrounding trees the wind appears to be present... If there was a wind present, then the flares would not sit fixated relative to their positions at times. They would mostly break the formation and appear to be moving, in irregular patterns.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. VossistArts 3MTA3 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    454
    A little fishy in my opinion. The film starts with someone standing on what sounds like a roadside filming through some vegetation... nothing. for 15 seconds. Unless they had seen the lights before filming and were having trouble locating them again with camera, why would they point the camera and film empty sky as if waiting for the lights to appear. At the very beginning there is nothing in the sky behind the two little bundles of maybe leaves. the camera pans to the right for a few seconds and returns to the original spot and now there are lights. the first two appear to flare and then descend out of sight as another one appears above ( at around the same height one of the first two seemed to start at) and to the right. It flares and immediately descends, almost out of sight and then another appears in the same approx. original spot. then all lights disappear. What I think is strange is how the camera operator doesnt speak much, and that it appears theyre holding the camera mostly stationary pointed at the same spot, rather than try to shift around or look for a better perspective. They keep the camera pointed at now empty dark sky, not scanning, but waiting for more lights to appear in the same spot. at around 4:46 in the film they zoom way back in. so we can see that during the whole first half or so of film they were zoomed WAY out. Looks like digital zoom too.. and Ive had cameras like that. The digital zoom trips out on bright lights in the distance, causing them to look disproportionately larger or sometimes with the original shape of the light becoming elongated, or geometrically shaped as the lens struggles to focus.
    Overall the lights all seem to appear then slowly descend as if floating, all the light objects just float down at around the same rate, and show no indication of have propulsion. a source or a particular destiny. other than higher to slowly lower down. Yeah, and if she wasnt zoomed all the way out like that, those lights would appear to be tiny! in the sky. Bright sure. But tiny.

    ( Additionally, she doesnt sound as shocked or astonished as she tries to indicate. The emotion doesnt really match the expression. On the other hand, I can imagine her being totally totally baked and sounding just like she does, but maybe with sincerity. Stoned sincerity.

    o my god. no Way. far out man.

    My conclusion. Lights in the sky obviously. Very likely Not spacecraft or even aircraft.

    But thanks for the post! Im totally addicted to Youtube ufo videos! Lots of mistaken identities, lots of deliberate hoaxes but a good number of ones that just make me think WTF. Thats some seriously weird shit. A lot of the really bizarre ones almost appear to be more like life forms than piloted crafts . They kind of make me think of pictures and video ive seen of super deep sea creatures.. but from space. lol. Bring on the weird!!!
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    I personally believe that she had seen something before she put the video on. The reason why I say this is because she doesn't appear to have been ''shocked'' when the first light appears like you would expect. I think it's very likely she has seen it and rushed for her video camera because it looked out of place.
     
  8. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058

    This is what I noticed as well, there appears for a split second a rapid decent which may be compatible with what you could expect from normal flare activity. It's when the objects rapidly slow down after the decent and manage to hold fixed positions when flares behave erratically, especially when there is a wind in the area, which there appears to be judging the surrounding trees.
     
  9. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    The one thing we do not tolerate on this site is "Intellectual Dishonesty", for instance you quoted only a portion of what I wrote to fit your agenda, what you didn't include is that I specifically stated if you don't hear a plane it was probably a flare shot from a Mortar launcher. Such dishonesty is exactly the reason why so many members here have "Picked on you", if you continue to manipulate a one sided perspective then you'll likely find yourself banned from this site.
     
  10. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    I am also uncomfortable with fact that she is declaring the UFO's will make crop circles the next day.


    You would only say this if you where already aware you were looking in the direction of crop fields and I know the MoD would not put on a display over crop fields. If we can understand why, for two of the objects there is a rapid decent for a split second and then settles to slowly drift, we might be able to identify them.

    Flares with parachutes maybe? Even if it was, how come the distance between the objects often appear fixed?
     
  11. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Piss off.

    I have never heard of a Mortar Launcher, but I have to be behaving intentionally dishonest right? Grow up. There is no reason why people have picked on me other than suppositions I was someone else they didn't like.

    Idea, don't just guess I know what you are talking about.
     
  12. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    No you would say this because it's "funny" statement to make. Just because she say's they'll be crop circles doesn't make it so.

    Just because I say so doesn't make it so. (after all I don't have your address, likely don't have access to your room and most definitely don't have a kipper to spare)

    I kept saying flares, you're just thinking of flares from a flaregun before weren't you (glorified fireworks) I was referring to the ones with chutes.
     
  13. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    You must have missed my post earlier, reports suggested there were no crop circles in the area the following day. I found this information from someone else on the net who did some investigating into the video.
     
  14. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    I am open to that idea, as I suggested it myself. It is possible the behaviour marks chutes being used. However, it doesn't explain why they are not falling towards or away from each other the other lights like you would expect from flares. There was also a wind in the area.
     
  15. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    So you can Google for a wiki entry for a UFO over Washington but you can't check online to see was a Mortar Launcher is? Seriously? Again this is proving a form of dishonesty in the sense of either laziness on your part or just piss poor excuses.

    It's doesn't matter if you are or aren't the same person as someone else, it wasn't that which offended them, it was your attitude problem. I wouldn't be surprised if you suffer Asperger's, so you are probably blatantly unaware of just how bad your attitude comes across.

    If you want to Investigate a UFO then investigate, that requires doing so research, otherwise you will always come across as just a deluded fool. This is the difference between believers and researchers. I can't be expected to hold your hand and potty train you.
     
  16. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Check you out. You think you are special enough that I need to start googling things you say.

    Some of us actually have a life, I have my own work on a daily basis than cross checking statements you have made - if you want the public to know what you are talking about, be a bit more specific that's all.

    Trying to put it down to laziness and whatever, is cheap since the same argument can be made about you.
     
  17. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Like the attitude I got when I first posted here? Do you want me to recite a lot of what I got? They presumed I must have been someone else because ''he or she liked to write equations'' then for weeks on end all I got called by was another posters name.

    You're a delusional little man, it's clear they were attacking me by accusing me of someone else. This is where it all started.
     
  18. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Put it this way, if I quoted what you said then pretended to know what you meant, would have been real intellectual dishonesty.


    But you have failed to realize this.
     
  19. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    This is the point isn't it Trapped, I point some things out, you get dishonest, I call you out and now you resort to playground taunts.

    Most people use Google, Wikipedia and a bunch of other sources when they don't understand something. I'm not saying Google everything because I'm special, I'm saying Google it when you don't know or you are unsure of something. Especially if you are using a memory or recollection of something, (you'd be surprised how much bogus reasoning occurs due to how the memory stores it)

    If you want to continue "flirting with me" through your honeyed words, that's up to you, but I tell you now... I don't swing that way, so you'll be wasting energy.
     
  20. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    Actually you are right, it isn't the point. What we have is you accusing me on an intellectual dishonesty even after admitting I didn't know what you were talking about. I simply didn't quote what you said, there is nothing dishonest in those actions.

    What you are calling dishonesty is the delusion that I must cross check every statement you make!
     
  21. Supertrooper Registered Member

    Messages:
    10
    I would not think for a second that this would be real; I remember posting a similar thread in a different forum, and most/all people said it was fake. Yes, it may seem all too compelling, the evidence is there; but how would we know that it was fake? And even if it wasn't, it would be the top news of today, tomorrow and the next day. Which it isn't. So no, I do not believe this to be true, nor false, but merely a misconception.

    -Supertrooper
     
  22. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    What they identified was your attitude and it was similar to that other posters (if not exactly the same). I was willing to overlook the similarities, however you do need to adjust your attitude if you want to post, fit in or not be "attacked".
     
  23. Trapped Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,058
    I have been wavering towards a terrestrial explanation for this sighting since last night. A few things are not answered yet, but hopefully I can clear those misconceptions.
     

Share This Page