Did I understand that correctly? Q1. Can you recall the timeline of the events prior to Kim de Gelder committing the baby killing murders? Answer 1. Yes, of course. Q2. Had you meet him before that event? Answer 2. That's what I think. Q3. Did he seem like a normal person if that meeting was the case? Answer 3. No Now if I have linked the answers to right question, would you explain your answer to Q2 when you say "That's what I think". Q4. Are you somewhat uncertain about whether he was with you prior to the murders of the babies? Q5. At what point in time did you feel like you loved him? I realise he was a handsome young man that many women would fall for. Q6. Was it a physical love? (as opposed to a purely emotional love) Q7. How did you meet him in the first place?
I haven't gotten it confirmed from him or anyone else that it was him I met. The Belgians claim it's impossible, that he apparently had an "alibi" for this particular date and place, but I'm not sure they are telling the truth.. 4. What do you mean with "with you"? 5. When we first met. 6. Hmm...I would say yes. 7. At a festival.
Did I understand that correctly? Q1. Can you recall the timeline of the events prior to Kim de Gelder committing the baby killing murders? Answer 1. Yes, of course. Q2. Had you meet him before that event? Answer 2. That's what I think. Q3. Did he seem like a normal person if that meeting was the case? Answer 3. No Now if I have linked the answers to right question, would you explain your answer to Q2 when you say "That's what I think". Q4. Are you somewhat uncertain about whether he was with you prior to the murders of the babies? (You ask me "What do you mean with "with you"?") Q5. At what point in time did you feel like you loved him? I realise he was a handsome young man that many women would fall for. Answer 5. When we first met. Q6. Was it a physical love? (as opposed to a purely emotional love) Answer 6. Hmm...I would say yes. Q7. How did you meet him in the first place? Answer 7. At a festival. So "Q4. Are you somewhat uncertain about whether he was with you prior to the murders of the babies? (You ask me "What do you mean with "with you"?")" is where some of the confusion comes in. You say he met you at a festival but the Belgium police are satisfied he was somewhere else at that time. You believe it was him with you there, but under the circumstances you must be wondering how that could happen. Could you answer some more questions? Q8 - what was the date and name of the festival that you met Kim at? Q9 - Were you in contact with Kim prior to meeting him (phone, email, websites, texting, whatever)? All your answers are 100% truthful so far thanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hultsfred_Festival http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/monthly.html?year=2008&month=6&country=1 Friday the 13th, June 2008. So they seem good recollections. Does the list of bands playing that year bring back good memories? What sort of drugs were you guys being using at the Festival?
http://www.dhnet.be/actu/faits/les-...pres-son-arrestation-51b79d01e4b0de6db9842b12 Q10. Could you honestly admit it wasn't Kim de Gelder you met at the Festival, but someone else , a look a like or similarly named person? Q11. When you went to Belgium did you get to see Kim face to face? Q12. Was he the same person you met at the festival?
This report is pretty harsh on you. Can it be explained? Right - is this is after the Festival but before the murders being committed by Kim? http://www.lalibre.be/actu/belgique...adeau-d-anniversaire-51b8b9f4e4b0de6db9baddfa
Yes, very good memories. I can only speak for myself there. I had been eating hasch-brownies all day and pretty much evey day for the past weeks before that ( I was creating music), so I was constantly stoned at the time. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! At the festival I aslo drank about 2 beers, one cider and one glass of whine. There were however people approaching me all the time, one of them could have slipped something in my bottle or glass when I wasn't looking.
This is pure sensational journalism and has little relevance whatsoever. No, this article is from 2010, right? The blog extract must be from just after the murders, when I was severly shocked.
Well let me ask Q12 again in a different way. Q12. From the photos in the press of Kim de gelder, was he the same person you met at the festival?
I would have to find that article again, to check it for dates, so I'm in a different time zone and I'm too tired to do it now sorry, but what I was wanting to know did you write to him after you met him, emails or hand written letters in the time between meeting him at the festival and when he was arrested? You say the blog was after, but what about blogs or email letters before? Make that Q13. Were there blogs, emails or hand written letters to Kim in the time between meeting him at the festival and when he was arrested?
I seem to recall that notable individuals like Winston Churchill, Oscar Wilde, James McNeill Whistler, Tallulah Bankhead, Dorothy Parker, Groucho Marx, Alfred Hitchcock, Truman Capote even Mohandas Gandhi were not above dishing out a bit of abuse. Doesn't the fact that 90 percent of the population found this witty and entertaining enter the equation? A lot of what makes us laugh comes from the internet and it's usually at someone else's expense. Yes, I do miss the heady days when the internet stood for the high ideals of our youth. A kind of digital utopia where we web denizens would band together to and finally decide who was responsible for the degradation of values in society? That fact that the answer that the internet gave us, i.e. that it was the fault of the feminists, atheists, gays, unwed mothers, liberal education, Hollywood, who am I missing? Should tell us something about the internet and the sort of people who are the most vocal on it. I think decrying mass consumerism and commercialism for degrading that internet is like blaming someone with Tourette's syndrome for being scurrilous in a sewer. The simple fact is that most people see the internet as a place where they can buy shit, flog shit and talk shit, about anyone and anything is the reality. Always has always will be. And what goes on, on this forum half the time is just more fodder for it.
13. I have been writing my blog pretty much continuously since 2003. There never were any emails. The handwritten letters were written after he got arrested.
OK, but how does one get to see what you blogged in 2008 - 2009? Q14. Can you give us the URL, the link, to that period please? I remember going though a site where there was like an enormous photo album. Is that still around? Q15. Can you give us the URL, the link, to that photo album please?
14. http://bebelina.blogspot.com No, you will have to browse through the archives yourself. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! 15. You mean www.angelinaelander.com? I couldn't afford to keep that page anymore.
Well that is pretty good Bebelina - I have asked 15 questions and you have not hesitated at all. I remember that some of the images were a bit weird, but there is no crime in that. I'll get back to you after looking at those links again.
Well, I'm not sure what page you are looking for regarding the photoalbum, but at http://bebelina.blogspot.com under the tag links you can find most of my other active pages. I don't mind answering your questions as long as they are open and not presumptious. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!