Thanks for trying, so I will respond.
1. So let's take this 3 million barrel for granted. (probably highly questionable, because of the other points) If the US needs is 20 million, then the 3 million is only 1/7th or 15%. Not badbut seeing how much foreign oil we use, bot enough. And again, if we take the Rand (not very objective) organization in blind faith.
2. The method sounds very energy wasting one. Lack of water is still and will be an issue.
4. I don't really trust an oil company's estimates. Probably half of it is true.
5. Depends. If they don't employ enough people, way more will be pissed by mess ed up enviroment and such...
So your argument is based on a new technology that might work or might not...
1. So let's take this 3 million barrel for granted. (probably highly questionable, because of the other points) If the US needs is 20 million, then the 3 million is only 1/7th or 15%. Not badbut seeing how much foreign oil we use, bot enough. And again, if we take the Rand (not very objective) organization in blind faith.
2. The method sounds very energy wasting one. Lack of water is still and will be an issue.
4. I don't really trust an oil company's estimates. Probably half of it is true.
5. Depends. If they don't employ enough people, way more will be pissed by mess ed up enviroment and such...
So your argument is based on a new technology that might work or might not...