I'm curious..Is there any atheist whose noble act has approached this?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by Mind Over Matter, Jun 23, 2012.

  1. Balerion Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,596
    But if I'm a guy, does that mean I gay-married Jesus?

    I'm obviously kidding, but that analogy just goes to show how silly gender roles and the condemnation of homosexuals is.

    So let me see if I have this right: even if a person doesn't believe in a god, when they do good, it's because of Jesus?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Mind Over Matter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,205
    I think to be canonized a saint, at least two miracles must have been performed after death.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Yes, it's for the benefit of living Muslims who they feel are oppressed, and to re-establish the Caliphate, much like Israel was established to protect Jews.


    I'm just asking, was his sacrifice due to his faith? Or was it just because that's the kind of guy he was. Or maybe he wanted to die. Suicide was not uncommon in the camps.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Balerion Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,596
    I'm sorry, let me rephrase: The difference is that there's no one to lie on their behalf about works being done by them after their death.

    I find the requirement of miracles after death kind of funny. Has there ever been an instance in which a wannabe saint, I dunno, tipped over a soda machine and didn't qualify? To me, if a dead person did anything other than be dead, that would be impressive.
     
  8. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    How many people died in the Russian Revolution to establish Communism? They certainly might have fought and died out of love for their people.
     
  9. Mind Over Matter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,205
    Do you mean formally canonized (recognized) as a Saint by the Catholic Church, or do you mean to become a Saint by going to Heaven? Technically speaking, everyone who is in Heaven who is not God is a Saint (including even the angels, I would guess - as St. Michael, St. Gabriel, et al, have the title.)

    So if the question is, can an atheist go to heaven for living a selfless and self-sacrificing life, we can only guess, as that decision is up to Jesus.

    If your question is, could an atheist be canonized by the Church as a confessor, it would seem unlikely, as there is a requirement to show evidence for canonization that "the venerable servant of God practiced virtues both theological and cardinal, and in an heroic degree." ("An constet de virtutibus Ven. servi Dei, tam theologicis quam cardinalibus, in heroico gradu").

    The "theological virtues" are Faith, Hope, and Charity. An atheist would have trouble with at least one of those. All three of those are defined as divinely infused, and an atheist by definition would not be able to demonstrate Faith, as while it is (per the Catholic Encyclopedia) "the secret of one's conscience; to the world it is made manifest by the good works in which it lives, "Faith without works is dead" (James 2:2). Such works are: the external profession of faith, strict observance of the Divine commands, prayer, filial devotion to the Church, the fear of God, the horror of sin, penance for sins committed, patience in adversity, etc." That would be a tough sell for an atheist.

    An atheist would also be unable to demonstrate Hope, as (again, from the Catholic Encyclopedia) Hope "is a firm trust that God will give us eternal life and all the means necessary to obtain it; it attains heroicity when it amounts to unshakeable confidence and security in God's help throughout all the untoward events of life, when it is ready to forsake and sacrifice all other goods in order to obtain the promised felicity of heaven. Such hope has its roots in a faith equally perfect."

    A true atheist would even have trouble with the theological definition of charity, as it requires that God be loved because of his inherent goodness, and our neighbor is loved on account of God. One could argue that an atheist could still be an unwitting servant of God, but how would he show theological virtues while living a life in denial of those virtues, as we define them?

    The four Cardinal Virtues (Prudence, Justice, Fortitude, and Temperance) could be evinced by an atheist, but as they are gifts of the Holy Spirit, it would be difficult to say one practiced them while denying their source. It would mean that the potential atheist saint was an idiot or two-faced or ungrateful, qualities one does not associate with saints.

    A Confessor (one of three classes of canonized saints) was originally used to designate one who suffered great hardship (torture, mutilation, enslavement, etc.), short of death by martyrdom, yet did not cease to confess Christ publicly as long as they lived. St, Maximus the Confessor, who had his tongue gouged out and his writing hand cut off by heretics but still found ways to confess the truth of Christ, would be a good example of this. Post 400 AD, and using the current definition, a Confessor is one who confessed (i.e., professed) the truth of Christ through teaching and deeds, which would eliminate atheists.

    If the atheist died as a Martyr for the Church, it would seem to imply that he made a last-minute conversion and renounced his atheism before death, as martyrdom requires that it be on behalf of, and as witness for, the truth of the Church. This would seem to be covered as a Baptism of Blood. But then, the martyr would no longer be an atheist, he would be a last-minute Catholic.
     
  10. Balerion Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,596
    No, I'm pointing out that the difference between great unbelievers and great people associated with the church is that the former has no system by which to be officially consecrated. At least not for your "common" heroes; monuments and statues and other commemorations are typically reserved for heads of state and other leaders.

    No, I'm asking no such question.

    Again, not what I'm saying. I was trying to illustrate the difficulty individual examples of nonbelievers doing the sort of thing you saw from the priest mentioned by the OP due to the fact that the church has a system by which they commemorate such individuals. Secular society does as well, but to a much lesser degree. In other words, you've likely never heard of the selfless man who died trying to save his neighbor's dog from a fire, because such a story gets lost in the news cycle and eventually disappears as if it never happened. Meanwhile, the priest who does something similar becomes a saint, and has statues erected in his honor.

    When you say "faith," you obviously mean "faith in God," otherwise you'd have to assume that no atheist trusts their cheating spouse or their addict brother or their deadbeat father in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. If that is what you mean, then I would agree that an atheist would clearly not be able to show that, nor would they consider it a virtue.

    Of course, to say that one requires faith to do good deeds or to have a conscience is a patently false statement. We've seen scientific studies posted to this very website which demonstrate that the opposite of your contention is true, and that it is the unbeliever who is more likely to be charitable.

    Again, by "hope" you mean this alternate and invented definition, and not it's actual definition. I can have hope that my mother is going to be alright, that I'm going to make something of myself someday, that my screenplay sells, etc.. What you're talking about is delusion.

    If that's what charity means to a theist, then surely it is better to be an atheist. My charity is more pure, because it comes from a love for my fellow man, whereas yours comes from a sense of duty to your creator, and only happens upon that creator's warrant. I don't need anyone's permission to be kind, nor do I need to love my neighbor through a buffer.

    Again, I'm not entirely sure where you're going with this, because I never asked if an atheist could be canonized.
     

Share This Page