Hottest

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Orleander, Aug 3, 2011.

  1. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I read somehwere a hundred billion degrees Kelvin.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Already covered:
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    So that's where I read it...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. MacGyver1968 Fixin' Shit that Ain't Broke Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,028
    It's going to be 110f in Dallas today...hot enough for me.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2011
  8. hardalee Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    I would think the LHC is, or will be when fully up, over a very small amount of space.
     
  9. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
  10. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    So exactly how can they tell what the temperatures are at that very high range? Is there a device that allows them to measure at this range, what is it?
     
  11. Pinwheel Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,424
    Dunno. Lasers?
     
  12. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    How would a laser determine the temperatures at over 500 billion degrees?:shrug:
     
  13. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,559
    The article is in error. The LHC also creates a 'quark-gluon-plasma', but uses Lead instead of Gold ions in the collisions. It is currently back to using proton collisions after having done Lead collisions, but it is intended to use Lead collisions again after their plans to 'upgrade' the machine to effectively double the energy.

    It presently holds the record for the 'hottest' (most energetic) collisions of heavy nuclei, not the RHIC as the article claims.
     
  14. Pinwheel Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,424
    The same way it determines temperatures at 5 degrees? :shrug:
     
  15. RedRabbit Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    139
    Would it be possible to measure the heat generated by the Big Bang?
     
  16. hardalee Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    Not unless you were there. But it can be calculated.
     
  17. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,644
    Pyrometers, most likely.
     
  18. Orleander OH JOY!!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    25,817
    do you know if it ever has been?

    And in this thread, have I been given a definitive answer as to where teh very hottest place in teh universe is?
     
  19. hardalee Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    At the big bang, likely temperature as well as time had no meaning. According to The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene, the tempertures in Degrees Kelvin were as follows at various times:

    10^-35 sec 10^28 K
    10^-12 sec 10^15K
    1 sec 10^10K
    10^9 years 10K
    today 2.7K Current tempeture of Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation, left over from the big bang.

    I wonder about time meant in the very early universe. I don't know if these answers mean anything based on that.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2011
  20. Orleander OH JOY!!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    25,817
    sorry, John. I have no idea what your post says. Is it a yes or a no?
     
  21. hardalee Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    384
    Sorry about the notation problem. 10^28 K is 10, with 28 0's after it. It is the temperature said to have existed at 10 with 35 0's after the decimal point.

    The first is very large, the latter very small.

    As to the hottest temperatre in the universe, I don't know as my view on what is the universe is all over the place.
     
  22. Paul W. Dixon Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    505
    Supernovae from experimentation?

    Aloha,

    Please recall that the type 1 a supernovae are the largest and most energetic(hotter?) of the supernovae and show no trace of hydrogen near maximum light. They do not gain sufficient mass through the accretion of additonal mass from neiboring hydrogen dominant objects. Are they then product of the pentance towards de Sitter space or some other energetic domain thus being the evidence of Supernovae from experimentation? Please follow the new observations of SN Type Ia in the Pinwheel galaxy.
     

Share This Page