Existence vs. characteristics - which is first?

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by wynn, Apr 25, 2011.

  1. jamesbrentonk Banned Banned

    Messages:
    80
    Existence directly preceeded any known conception of it.

    Did any known conception of it directly preceede any known occurance of it? No.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    I think however, the question has to be in terms of knowing about it.

    Unfortunately, "existing" as you clearly stated, doesn't require the precedent of being conceptualized... but to discuss it, one has to conceive of it.

    Then, while you may attempt to speak of the object you conceive to exist, you can really only speak of its conception.

    No?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Yes, and anyone who doesn't understand that is just not advanced enough!!!!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Wilde says that even things that are true can be proved. Although even I am not sure what he meant by that.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Sarkus Hippomonstrosesquippedalo phobe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,406
    Can you dissect "running" from an athlete's body?
    No, you can merely identify a pattern of activity within a person that we have labelled as "running".
    Same with consciousness.
    Not quite, afterall the heart exists but that doesn't mean blood is flowing.
    Proof is in observation... if a certain pattern of activity exists then that generally suffices.
    Can we say that one person's experience of consciousness is the same as another person's? No. But then I'm fairly sure no two people in the world run in precisely the same way (different gait, balance, stride-length, rhythm etc)
     
  8. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,028
    Could be differences in the operation of consciousness, but the main is not that but that we all have uniquely different experiences witnessed in consciousness.
     
  9. Sarkus Hippomonstrosesquippedalo phobe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,406
    If we consider consciousness a digital quality - i.e. you either have consciousness or you don't - then I'd not disagree.
     
  10. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,028
    We have it when we're awake and not under anesthesia; otherwise it's a goner.

    Here's my best definition of consciousness:

    "That annoying time between naps."
     
  11. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    You don't like life! I knew it!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,028
    I love it to death.
     

Share This Page