Wiki, the undisputed source of all knowledge...

Discussion in 'Ethics, Morality, & Justice' started by Randwolf, Jul 3, 2009.

Page 3 of 3
  1. krazedkat

    krazedkat IQ of "Highly Gifted"-"Genius" Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    262
    Most teachers think I am absolutely insane for holding this view, you see, our teachers are somewhat, how should I put it, retarded. We can't use wikipedia.
     
    krazedkat, Jul 13, 2010
    #41

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Stryder

    Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    That's all well and good, however it becomes something similar to how tribal peoples would replicate stories for generations. Storytellers were known to be inventive, after all the oral replication would lose some "facts" over the decades and they would have to be reinvented by the storyteller to generate depth and interest to the tribes people.

    I guess what I'm saying is by all means include Sources, but be prepared for any Hypothesizes, theories or conclusions to be brought into dispute by other wiki users, after all if they aren't peer reviewed previously they could be perceived in poor repute.
     
    Stryder, Jul 13, 2010
    #42

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. John99

    John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    It is not the best source of information but then what is? It was kind of a turn off when they were asking for money (donations).
     
    John99, Jul 13, 2010
    #43

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Emil

    Emil Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,801

    That is your opinion.
    To convince me, please give examples of what wiki says is not correct.
     
    Emil, Jul 14, 2010
    #44
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page