A simple question to the anti-Israel faction

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Alien Cockroach, Apr 4, 2010.

  1. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886
    For a change, give us a straight answer: what exactly do you propose having done with Israel?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    I'm hardly anti-Israel but I strongly disapprove of the current policies of its government and the knee-jerk support provided by the United States.

    So I would start by reducing U.S. aid to Israel. We give Israel one third of our entire foreign aid budget: $3 billion. In such a tiny pipsqueak of a country, that comes out to $500 per citizen.

    Of course most of that is military aid, making Israel a client state to do our bidding. We don't have to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, the Israeli air force will do it for us.

    Then, if there are no restrictions on this imaginary plan, I would take the Palestinian territories out from under the control of the Israeli government and military. I might let the U.N. adminster them, or perhaps a hegemony of Arab states. Or if all else fails, give them to China. They have a lot of experience in suppressing uprisings, by forcibly migrating ten or twenty million Chinese people and declaring the territory to be part of China. The Chinese army would make Hamas nostalgic for the kind, gentle, fair treatment they got from the Israeli government.

    Of course what I would really like is a time warp, to go back and stop the British from magnanimously giving Palestine to the Jews because as far as they could tell, nobody important was living there. Sure, it was a nice nostalgic gesture to move the Jews to a region that their mythology calls their "homeland." Sort of like when the USA gave Arizona back to the Navajo. Oh wait, we haven't done that yet, have we. I can't figure out why not, since it's exactly the same as Israel.

    But if the Europeans had offered the Jews an equivalent-sized chunk of Poland, France, Hungary, Austria, Germany, Lithuania, Bohemia, Ukraine, etc., they would have been just as happy. Probably happier, since they were already accustomed to living in those places and rather liked them, at least until Hitler took over. "Next year in Jerusalem" was, after all, a toast, not a plan. The Jews who were happily ensconced in Prague, Vienna, Rome, Paris and Copenhagen had absolutely no desire to go live in the frelling desert.

    If Israel had been set up in the middle of Europe, it would probably be a member of the EU by now and it would be solving the world's financial troubles. It's a safe bet that it would not be the center of a war zone.

    I suppose Israel would still have an "Arab problem" because of the massive migration of Muslims to Europe, but at least they wouldn't be so well armed. It wouldn't be as easy for Iran and Syria to deliver weapons to Muslims who were completely surrounded by European nations, as it is to deliver them to Muslims who are completely surrounded by Muslim nations with the single, tiny exception of Israel.

    The only thing that's really wrong with Israel is its location. Our government moves peoples around all the time: the Cherokee used to live in Georgia. And Oklahoma worked out really well for them: it's full of petroleum and now they're rich.

    Hey, let's just move Israel to Alabama. It would be the best thing that ever happened to that state!
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I hold the same as I always have, a one state solution with equal civil and political rights for all its inhabitants. The occupation is oppressive and immoral it should be eliminated by the simple consequence of affording right of return to the displaced refugees who were dispossessed in 1948 and suffrage to all those who are forced to live under a military made up essentially of foreign invaders.

    Who's Afraid of a One-State Solution?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Cowboy My Aim Is True Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,707
    I definitely question the wisdom of my government's unquestioned loyalty to Israel's interests at the expense of our own (especially when Israel doesn't return the favor).

    I have no ill will towards the people of Israel, but the American government should focus on pursuing American interests.
     
  8. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886
    Well, if you would try making your case without insulting the intelligence of anyone who lives West of Dubai, you might find that more people are willing to hear you out. Personally, I think it would only work under a three-level constitutional republic. There is too much risk for abuse against minorities under an absolute democracy.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2010
  9. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Amen!
     
  10. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Interesting perspective. The question is can both groups live together in peace?

    I have always been uncomfortable with states like Israel which values one group of citizens above another.
     
  11. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    That's clearly the most civilized approach.

    But the Israeli government and the vast majority of Israeli Jews who support it base their world view on the principles of Abrahamism, which reinforces the atavistic instinct of "us versus them because we're automatically better than everyone else, no matter how well or poorly we behave." This is pure Stone Age tribalism, and it conflicts with the basic premise of civilization, which is to improve the lot of humanity by transcending tribalism.

    The Israeli Jews will never condone truly equal rights for people who are not Jewish by DNA, culture or religion. They are horrified that Arabs already comprise a full one-fifth of their citizenry, and that their birth rate is much higher than their own. They're struggling to devise a scheme that will prevent Israel from becoming majority Arab within a few more generations. Many Israeli Arabs are Christians, but nonetheless a majority Muslim population will not be too much further off if nothing changes. In any case, for Christians and Muslims together to outnumber Jews, presumably voting in an uneasy bloc against a repressive theocratic regime, does not satisfy their definition of a "Jewish state."

    To admit a few million more predominantly Muslim Palestinians as Israeli citizens (not to mention many millions more who now languish elsewhere in refugee camps) will only hasten the demise of Israel's medieval fantasy of a nation defined by its particular interpretation of an archetypal fairytale.

    The only real solution to the Israel problem is for the Jews who have chosen to live there to grow up and stop believing in fairytales that separate them from their neighbors.

    Jews elsewhere are doing that. In the USA they intermarry at such a high rate with the mainstream population that Jewish leaders call attrition the greatest threat to the existence of an American Jewish community. They speak as though they are almost nostalgic for the nonviolent discrimination of the pre-WWII era that kept many of them huddled together in middle-class schtetls.

    Abrahamic Religions: our era's greatest obstacle to civilization.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    @Fraggle:

    You do realise that religious Jews oppose Zionism, which being centered on state rather than God is actually an atheistic ideology? Religion has forever been hijacked by atheists, Jews as a religious group had no need of Zionism, while Israel as a state has destroyed Judaism in a way that 2000 years of Torah learning could not. In fact, right up until Zionism, Jews lived with non-Jews in Palestine for over 2000 years.

    Do you think Tzipi Livni is religious? Or the Russian Lieberman is? These are the face of left and right Zionism in Israel.

    Do you think they keep the Sabbath?
     
  13. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886
    Well, the idea behind the peace talks is to try to navigate Israel and West Bank into a position in which they can feasibly work on building a unified state, assuming they have any inclination to. It takes years for two separate cultures to build themselves up to that level of accord. The European Union is a striking example of how republics are built, not declared.

    The European Union, in spite of the fact that it is functionally a very loosely federated republic, still regards itself largely as separate, unique political entities. They can't even tax people directly. Their government just has a very different shape and scope from what we are used to thinking of as a government.

    However, the US is not an absolute democracy, sea to sea, either. In political reality, we are not "one nation." Our government is the federal constitutional presidential republic of the United States of America. The layers of our government range from the federal level to the local HOA.

    It just wouldn't work to try to merge the whole region into one government, all at once. It would have to played according to political and governmental realities.
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Does it matter if there are racists who do not want to do the right thing? Should that be an impediment to supporting what is right?

    You live in a country where native Americans were burned alive and blacks were lynched. Is it possible for people to get along after a history like that?
     
  15. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    However, we are still discussing whether to send the black people back to Africa, so ignorant white people will finally stop using accusations of racism as a daft ad hominem argument. In this country, you could prove that the world is flat by accusing people of racism. It is just as like the "imperialism" argument: it is overused and retarded.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2010
  16. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    Some of them. Most favor it - or used to (second thoughts are growing).

    Most of the actual Jewish opposition to Zionism has come from atheistic or "indifferent" Jews, as well.

    Many of the Zionist immigrants to Israel are quite religious. Most of them are at least casual believers.
    Religion has forever been hijacked by the tyrannical of all kinds. That's one of the major problems with it, at least among the modern monotheistic forms - it hands an incoming tyrant (and there is certain to be an incoming tyrant) a large body of pre-conditioned and pre-selected and pre-organized followers, eager to regard unquestioning faith in nonsensical and megalomaniac authority as a virtue and clearly displaying the code words or concepts by which they may be manipulated.
    The way the US did it - imperfectly - is by having one of the groups be overwhelmingly powerful for several generations.

    And even then we had riots in our major cities, oppressive and dangerous expansion of police scope of action, the National Guard necessary to escort little kids to school, for a while.
     
  17. philipthegreat Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    34
    Israel treats its muslim minority far better than all of its Arab neighnors treated their minoirty. Look at the plight of the Coptics in Egypt, or the Kurds in Turkey, or even of the Greek Orthodox in Turkey.

    The Israeli Arabs that excepted Israeli citizenship after the War of Independence, peacefully coexist in Israel and are fairly assimilated.

    Also, everyone who pleads for the plight of the Arab refugees after 1948, why do none of these people discuss the plight of the Jews who after 1948were kicked out of their homelands in the Arab world?
     
  18. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Frankly I don't really care about what happens in Israel or Palestine. I think the US should withdraw all support for Israel as Israel does nothing to support the US. The US taxpayer contributes billions of dollars each year to Israel and has nothing to show for it, but some Israelis blowing smoke up our ass.

    I prefer my ass smoke free. Perhaps if the US withdrew all financial and military support for Israel they would be forced to come to some accord with their neighbors.

    If Jews in this nation and around the world want to support Israel with their dollars, fine. But they should not use and we should not give dollars from our public coffers to support a theistic state that spies on us and has attacked our military in the past and never given a full accounting of same.
     
  19. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886
    Whereas I think that it is simply a matter of human decency to try to prevent a human rights catastrophe.

    Let's do some math:

    US population: roughly 300,000,000

    Proportion of Americans who are taxpayers: 2/3

    Taxpayer money going to Israel: about $2,000,000,000 annually

    So let's do some math:

    $2,000,000,000/(300,000,000*(2/3))=$10

    Do you have Paypal? I do. I am a starving nearly to death college student, but I would be happy to reimburse you, on behalf of the entire State of Israel, if ten dollars mean that much to you.

    Shouldn't we be more concerned with trying to figure out a way of dealing with this issue that gets the fewest number of people killed or run into poverty?
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2010
  20. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    A couple of things, first your numbers are wrong. The US provides 3 billion dollars per year plus loan guarentees. Two, not everyone it the US is a tax payer. A little less than half of that 300 million figure you quoted are actually working. So that alone doubles the number you provided. What are the loan guarentees worth?

    And you are missing the point. Why should the American tax payer be forced to support a theocracy period. The United States government does not provide financial support to the Catholic Church/Vatican. So why should it provide financial support the Israel? What value do I get for my tax dollar?

    I will tell you what I get. I get a associated with a state that does not comply with United Nations Mandates. I get associated with a state known for its blatent violation of international laws (most recently the assination of and individual in Dubai). I get associated with a nation that has no interest in preserving anyone or anything but a Jewish state. I get spied on by this entity who is receiving my tax dollars. And I get my unarmed naval ship in international waters attacked and servicemen killed. (USS Liberty). I think that is more than enough.

    Perhaps if the US stopped supporting Israel financially, she would learn to live peacefully with her neighbors.

    I would rather be spending that money on the US debt. Assumnig that the amount the US spends in 3 billion per year, that equates to about 1.6 percent of the annual interest the US pays on its debt. And if I had my way, I would much rather keep my 20 dollars than give it to a charity like Israel.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2010
  21. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    It was not possible before: hence, Israel.

    Very amusing discussion so far. "How, oh how can Palestinians live peacefully alongside Jews when Jews separated themselves from Palestinians because Palestinians wouldn't leave them in peace?"

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. Alien Cockroach Banned Banned

    Messages:
    886
    Odds are, you don't even make median income, so I would probably owe you even less than ten dollars. Haha. I can split hairs just like you. It's not hard.

    No. You are missing the point. The US would have to spend over a hundred times what they are presently sending into Israel for it to even vaguely affect your lifestyle. The point is that you presented me with the most money-grubbing, bean-counting, YUPPIE-ass argument that you could possibly produce. Don't expect me to believe that's really where you're coming from.

    Are you being retarded on purpose? I think that you are because you know, just like I do, that Israel is ruled by a secular government. You are making up blatant hogwash again. I think you have no place in this discussion if you are going to fuck with people.

    You aren't going to tell me jack shit because you have taught me not to trust a thing that comes through your typeface. There is no scenario where I trust the next thing you say after you pretend to be an ignorant asstard as an obscene, artless way of trying to fuck with the issue.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2010
  23. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    We also contribute something on the order of one billion to the Palestinian Authority.

    At least we don't support Hamas. Although maybe if the people in Gaza--former Egyptians--were as prosperous as those in the West Bank--former Jordanians, a much wealthier and more Westernized country--they'd vote Hamas out of office.
    Regardless of this thread being focused on Israel, it's not quite fair to lay all the blame on them. Hezbollah is a major force in Lebanon. Syria and Iran provide most of the funding and weaponry to both Hezbollah and Hamas. Saudi Arabia, despite its facade of tolerance toward Israel in order to make nice with the USA, is the majority financier of the worldwide anti-Western Islamist terrorist movement.
    Ever since the end of WWII and the gut-wrenching photos of the Nazi camps, the USA has somehow assumed responsibility for Israel's success. It's as if we share Europe's guilt for a thousand years of antisemitism, when in fact even at our worst we were arguably the one country that gave its Jews a better deal than they had in the Ottoman Empire--their high water mark for more than two thousand years. Second only to China, where they were accepted so matter-of-factly in medieval times that they assimilated and vanished.

    According to some contemporary accounts, most of the Jewish refugees considered themselves Europeans first and Jews second, and would have preferred to go back to their homes in Europe, even if they had to fill in bomb craters in order to rebuild them. In a signal that European antisemitism did not die with Hitler, the Europeans were willing to do anything to atone--except invite them back.

    The Europeans sent the Jews to Palestine under the subterfuge that Zionism was a crusade rather than a last resort. Having finally begun, as the smoke from WWII cleared, to struggle in earnest with our own tradition of racism, I guess we just felt that the duty fell on us to save the Jews, even if their plight wasn't even our fault.

    It's too late to save the poor Indians. Maybe we can make up for it by saving the Jews?
    That's an oversimplification. The schism between the Jews and the Palestinians goes back thousands of years. DNA suggests that the ancestors of the Palestinians may have been no more or less than the Canaanites who did NOT wish to accept the wacky new religion of Abraham.

    The Lebanese and Palestinians are more closely related genetically to the Jews than to the Arabs. This is a family squabble that has been going on for longer than we have been a country. It would be amusing, if it weren't so stupid, that the U.S. thinks that it can resolve ethnic rivalries that are utterly ancient.

    Suppose we tell the Palestinians that that land historically belongs to the Jews, so no matter how many centuries they have spent building homes there, the only morally right thing to do is to give it back to them. They'll turn right around and tell us that we must then give Arizona back to the Navajo.

    So we think that over and say they're right. Possession is nine points of the law, that's a hallowed tradition in Ango-American culture. Regardless of how the Palestinians ended up making their home in Israel, they established a common-law claim to it, and it should be theirs. Then the Jews can turn around and tell us that based on that principle, we have to give Arizona back to the Mexicans.

    We should stay the hell out of this one!
     

Share This Page