Once again uno is as wrong as can be. You claim incredible strengths for these builds. Provide evidence. You have provided nothing so far.
I swear, put me in the pilots seat mid-air, and i'll hit any building you want me to. It's fucking easy.
1. No one has been able to find any analysis that confirms this. 2. Leslie Robertson, the lead structural engineer for the WTC disagrees and believes that it was designed to handle a collision from a plane flying slower, potentially lost in fog and that the jet fuel was not considered. 3. Structures have failed before when met with conditions that they were designed to deal with. 4. The towers did stand after being struck. They were up for an hour or so. Tens of thousands of lives were saved because of this.
This man cares. And he wants to know the truth. Added to that, he has the power, the money, and the influence (mostly) to find out some answers. There was so little freedom left after 9/11 and the Patriot act, he moved to Mexico. Let's take a look at his investigation, shall we? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJR3LFu3i9c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh_iKakr-ug http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpzTau6qDz8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqyDEGSStRM A little dramatic, but overall, a pretty good explanation. Certainly a much better investigation than that silly rag the 9/11 report. You're a fool if you say otherwise I contend. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Maybe if enough people wake the f*** up he'll move back and run for president, eh? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7816675266710286414#
nice! you know more than the side you're arguing against! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! what infantile fools they must look to you, huh? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I know I always believe former professional wrestlers over ..you know...actual scientists and engineers.
Poisoning the Well fallacy. He was also a governor with access to powerful people and the best, "actual scientists and engineers," for his investigation. To slander someone, but not address their research and evidence, is a juvenile rebuttal at best. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3969310749489496889#
Well I can already tell you that the quote is bullsh1t because the twin towers collapsed in one hour and 45 minutes, how could the fire burn for 3 hours if the building collapsed in less than two hours.
Obviously you didn't READ closely enough. . . do the research. THIS fire, (on the 11th Floor of WTC North Tower), happened in 1975. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Apr_05/100405_WTC_Fire.html http://www.nytimes.com/1975/02/14/nyregion/14WTC.html http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/not-so-hot.htm http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/debunk_9-11.html . . . the rest at. . . . http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/trusses.htm Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! If nothing happened to the structural steel then. . . . .