Nasrallah to Israelis: Send Your Whole Army, We'll Destroy Them!

And as I've stated before, by that logic any Arab living outside the Arabian peninsula is a trespasser. At least you should be clear whenever you speak that the problem isn't about Israel attacking Lebanon or Gaza or wherever, but that the true and fundamental crime is their very existence. Wonder how much sympathy you'd get from Europe if you and all the millions of like-minded folks agitating for war were open and honest about your oppressive ambitions.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Right, as soon as he establishes a demographically Arab state replacing native inhabitants and bombs and kills them if they want to come home.

Which are what exactly? Not sending the Jewish immigrants back to Poland even though they've been as resistant to assimilation in the Middle East as they were in Europe? Even though they've graduated from kosher ghettos to secular [Jewish] states? Even though they are blindfolding and shackling students for studying in their own universities in their own land?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

considering that Nazzballah couldnt find his *explicative that rhymes with "mass"* with two hands and three others to outline it for him does not instill fear or worry in his "competance" to lead a country let alone instructing his men to shoot their guns in a forward direction

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Aaah, most of north Africa all the way to Spain?

 

Which natives were replaced? Or do you also consider Arabisation to be the same as population replacement?

Polish Jews speaking a 2000 year old language are not natives.

 

Yes, arabisation was population replacement!

Jews?, I'm not talking about jews.

 

And that 2000 year old language isn't Khazar, is it? So what region is that language native to?

 

How is this any different than historical Arab Military arrogance? Their military leaders always say inflammatory remarks and lie to each other...what's the difference here? They rarely win because they all lie to each other...and themselves.

 

Could you be any more victim to propaganda?

 

There is difference when you recognize what your occuping as not yours and belong to the occupied and when you don't.

 

Yeah that why the Israelis pulled out of Lebanon: they knew it was not theirs.

 

you know the first historical mentioning of arabs doesn't refer to people in the arabian peninsula?

 

but not palestine. they have a death grip on that.

 

We are talking about Lebanon on this thread.

 

The source Brian quoted refers to Nasrallah (btw, this is what "Nasrallah" means in Russian) as "his eminence".

Are you kiddin me? hahaha

Anyway, yes... it's great for shithead to be saying all these things, that he welcomes a full invasion of the IDF into Lebanon when the last time it happened about 1000 Lebanese died, many of whom were innocent people.

Hmm... smells like he WANTS the IDF to kill as many Lebanese as possible, so that he can complain to Goldstone and get the whole of Israel on trial at the Hague. Thank goodness Israelis love the Lebanese more than Nasrallah wants to kill all Israelis.

 

From a purely operational standpoint, Nasrallah's words are simple bluster. In the last war, the IDF employed only a fraction of a fraction of its force, and even in the last 48 hours, when the IDF called on more troops for a quick push to the Litani (which Hezbollah fully failed in containing), it still used roughly 10% of its fighting force. There's a reason why the border has been quite (from a Hezbollah standpoint), since 2006, for the first time in 30 years.

 

His remarks are wishful thinking.

 

His remarks serve the purpose of keeping Hizballah's raison d'être alive. Hizballah's highly irrelevant in Lebanon. They aren't needed. There are no "occupied" Lebanese territories (except those used as a pretext and excuse to not give up Hizballah's weapons), and Israel has no reason to invade Lebanon except to retaliate against Hizballah's provocations. There is no need for Hizballah's stated aims. No one to defend against.

Hizballah is in effect an occupier. A blackmailer. A foreign malignant entity controlled by "outside forces", as referred to by Lebanese opposed to Hizballah, carefully avoiding naming Iran for fear of violent extra-judicial retribution.

Hizballah needs legitimacy from Lebanese so that the relationship between it and them be of "cooperation" as opposed to tyrant occupier. Creating an enemy out of Israel serves that purpose. All Israel wants is to have diplomatic relations and be best friends with Lebanese. There is no real-estate or resources that Israel needs or wants from Lebanon, other than in the context of normal trade it has with all other countries. All this militancy is unnecessary.

I feel sad for ordinary patriotic Lebanese for having this cancerous tumor called Hizballah among them. It is sad that the Shia cannot participate in Lebanese politics without having all these guns. All other factions gave up their weapons after Taif. All except Hizballah. That is not fair, and creates a huge rift which is only not exploding because of the superior weapons Hizballah posesses.

One day they will disappear and lebanon will return to being the Switzerland of the Middle East.

 

Well, we did cover that issue about the sortie of Arab Y-chromosomal markers from Saudi Arabia. How do you think they got there? Osmosis?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Ironically, Eastern Jews use elements of this same language. Kudos on your logical process.

 

So your kids are replaced native populations? They no longer have any right to be called Americans?

Link?