Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Wonderful sense of humor, RaitherePlease Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I appreaciate that kind of stuff.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
the atheist would probably be like.... "What the hell took you so long? All my life I've forlorny searched for meaning and truth in this puzzling universe and NOW you come to prove your existence just as i'm about to be lunch for one of your creatures? Some God you are.....!" And God was terribly upset, it'd been a long time since anyone criticised him. Heaven was full of god fearing people who would never dare..... wait, NO one had ever critisied him! God was enraged, in a tantrum he brought about the apocalypse.....
but before he could do this, superdupergod appeared on the horizon and kicked gods ass..."he always has been a sissy", superdupergod said, "even in kindergarten.' We used to tie him to a black hole until he cried for his mummy... "Anyway...you people continue living now and let me know when this loser bothers you again." and superdupergod continued patrolling the universe, to keep it neat and natural.
* Despite Mr. Webster's assertions, I believe the words are used differently in a philosophical context. Agnosticism is an epistemological stance, stating that one cannot know (that there is or isn't a god). Weak atheism is the refusal to assert the existence of a god. Strong atheism is the assertion that there is no god. On the subject, I'm a strong atheist, but have found it difficult to defend such a position. I don't think anything other than weak atheism can be soundly asserted, just assumed.
