oh...i thought you were confused and meant to say 'pray tell' or something similar. i know you just woke up and thought you were still sleepy.
Excuse me? I don't see anything bigoted about this question of mine. I'd like to hear how far for you the Palestinian history reaches. Hopefully you come up with some information that pre-dates 1800. Seriously? I thought that the land of Palestine was one bloody malaria-filled swamp with almost no habitants before the first Jewish pioneers came there to drain the swamps and make this place a more civilised place to live in, once done so the land became very attractive for interlopers and squatters - your so-called Palestinians - from the neighbouring Arab states of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. Especially the areas that were under the influence of Jews became a real attraction for illegal immigrants from the aforementioned states because of the decent life conditions, job opportunities, healthcare, etc. What does that imply? That before the first Jewish Zionists came this land was one huge sh*t hole with no existent State, no system, nothing, basically a place where nobody was really willing to stay. Meaning, there was no real Arab-Palestinian history before the Arabs started to create one after 1948. Looks like before that, there was no such thing as Arab-Palestinian. Sooo, what was it about your Palestinian movement that pre-dated the one of the Jews? Anyway, back to my initial question. What's a Palestinian?
Of course you don't. Bigots never see them selves as bigots. Um yeah it was such a fetid swamp land that the french used to bolster their food production. But of course you thought what you did. Right, it was all the jews that made it what it was despite the fact it was referred as being fairly green and verdant long before your precious zionist came along. Yawn more empty factless bigoted ranting More lies from the bigot You know your just asking questions in hopes someone is dumb enough to fall for your ploy in trying to deny the Palestinians peoplehood.
When you call everyone a bigot, the statement really begins to lose it's value. We have to consider the source and ignore you. If I sound like a bigot, I am sorry. I don't mean to be. I am talking about the rule of war here. To the victors go the spoils, correct? Israel has the right to all the land and has no obligation to give up one inch of it. The Arabs forfeited any rights they previously had to it when they attacked Israel. Israel won all four wars. That isn't bigotry. It's nothing but the truth. But, nothing makes war right in the first place does it?
I suppose you also are in agreement with the desecration of the Church of Bethlehem by Israel and the exile of Christian Palestinians from their native lands. The irony of Christians supporting a colonial Zionist state against fellow Christians is quite perplexing.
Thats rather backward logic. The inhabitants of any house, community or land are duty bound to attack anyone who invades their home, community or land with the intention of establishing a state for foreigners. Indigenous peoples the world over have a right to live on their lands regardless of who decides to invade or occupy it.
I don't support or agree with anything done by any organized religion. My personal views have little in common with any of them. Because I support the creation after two thousand years of the restoration of Israel, you automatically assume I am a "Christian" who supports a colonial Zionist state? No, I do not. They are two different things. Israel is not perfect. In it's present state it's just as corrupt as any other nation. The future of Israel is another matter, that is what I believe in. It has nothing to do with the creation of another colonial state. That would be quite perplexing wouldn't it? Corrupt colonial states, corrupt organized religions.... I believe the world could use a rest from them all for a while.
When you put it like that....I would have to agree. It is highly likely it wasn't done with only the best of intentions. A few posts back if you will read, I stated I believed it was done in part to create conditions that will lead the nations back into another world war. Intentionally. There has to be some problems before someone can claim to have fixed them. There are many "powers that be" at play here. I do sympathize with any innocent people that have been attacked and had their land stolen. Nothing ever makes that right. But that seems to be the way of this whole world doesn't it? The strong steal from the weak and prosper. We have all been made slaves and had our land stolen in one way or another. Is this really the more beautiful kingdom? Not in the slightest. This is a negative. It will take the light to develop the picture.
Yes, this is what Jewish school teaches Jewish children. But wrong history, more stuff from big pipe. You open toilet door, now shit come out for you. Romans conquered Palestine (remember those guys?) which Jews not happy about, rebel against much larger, stronger military force, like bugs on windscreen. Jews from Europe decided everything done by Romans, Palestinians not compatible with required history for Jews. Jews are the squatters, but arrive with army, tanks, militias like Indonesian military have for Timorese who has wrong history for Indonesians. Jews want to believe, so believe. Germans want to believe Jews big problem, starve Jews and keep in enclosed area, control Jewish problem because Jews wrong history for Germans. But Jews took land already developed; not big swamp. Big swamp is where Jewish state now living, full of stuff from big pipe, they like to think smell pure and nice, but big stink in actuality. For Palestinians downstream of illegal land grab especially. Take from people, keep for self; starve people who don't agree with Jewish history; oppress people who don't wipe ass of Jew.
They are trying to rattle that saber aren't they? "No longer bound by the 1953 armistice".....moving ICBMs to launchpads... http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSSEO14165620090530 Sounds like something out of a James Bond movie. Of course, if Israel attacks Iran that won't be just another slow news day either. Then there is Pakistan and India heating up, with the Taliban going for control of Pakistan's nukes India won't wait much longer. Anyone care to specify the definition of a world war?
Israel will be attacking a perceived enemy, which Jewish version of history claims is compatible with ancient writings in a book. This very stupid logic. Israel will pay very dearly and rest of world too, Iran/Persia is not nation to trifle with. Maybe Ned the yahoo thinks all good, God on side. Big pile again, need to get some paper and clean up mess first, in head. Head full of smelly stuff from pipe-dream. That dude need to chill, get some gold and toke out for while.
Persia not to trifle with?...Please. Sorry, but the "mother of all battles" has been done to death. Both the Koran and the Bible have similar prophecies that agree the Arabs will be totally annihilated, but they don't seem to care.
Romans left Persians alone, too much problem to invade even though worth taking. You make mistake, like many before, generals who thought their armies could take Afghanis country, march into Iran. Big dream. Iraq like a chessboard, nice and flat for Western game. Iran like maze and very steep very hard to conquer. Bombing raid will not achieve anything for stupid dumbass Ned. Israel might regret selecting him to lead great state, pure homeland. Big pile of shit rain down on everyone. from stupid ass Nedster. He need to trade in his donkey-cart.
So what? They didn't have America either. You think Ned the needy, is convinced Iran doesn't already have too? Sure, you betcha.
