If it's true that we are information, what dimensions does it have, this "information that we are"? It's apparent that whatever our model of physical reality, we construct three dimensions within or along another, that is fundamental to the construction itself. We call the fundamental one time and construct, or measure three others. If information is essentially one-dimensional, except by being so, i.e. by looking like a simple line with two different ends we can swap around, which then generates another dimension, then we need to do this "across" something - we need to connect this idea of a swap, from one end or one side to another, to the idea of rotating the one dimension (that information has). So our one dimension of existence as (one-dimensional) information, is a continuous swapping (comparison), that generates two other spatial dimensions. There is evidence that our brains construct the third spatial degree-of-freedom from two (i.e. an xy generates a z). This is essentially what a quantum measurement is as well. This isn't suggesting anything other than a general "principle of information".
interesting since two dimension don't exist and relativity and its 4-dimensions is all about information , but nothing more and that information can be at times ( no pun intended ) false or misunderstood
Notice to Vkothii: You may retain one and only one user name. If you create any more sock puppets for the purposes of evading a temporary ban, your ban will be made permanent. On your return, please let me know which of your two other user names you wish to use. I will ban the other one.
Universal logic gates are classical and quantum, because a classical system is always correlated to quantum systems. It's like there are four kinds of circuit you can always build in this space, because there are classical and quantum parts, and one is the part we are in. Consider a universal set \( \mathbb U\, \), which contains classical and quantum unitary operators U, as \( \{C_c,C_q\}\, \), ordinary duples. We build an arbitrary number of C and Q type one-way gates or circuits, so that for an assembly of n such circuits, which are in a complex phase space, n is encoded as \( |\Psi\rangle^{\otimes n}\, =\, \mathbb1\mathit_n\, \), where the RHS represents the output normalised, or enumerated in terms of n, for n degrees of freedom. The output is exclusive, \( |\phi_{out}\rangle\, =\, C_c \oplus Cq \), one half of the duple. The output is always the result of an exclusive selection of correlations, which we transform into the classical frame. Classically correlated circuits, or CC-universal circuits must "be capable of reproducing the statistics of local measurements performed on the state \( U|0\rangle_{\otimes n} \) A CC-universal computer is simply one which can perform universal classical computation" Classical data must evolve in polynomial time for any unitary operations U in a polynomially-scaled quantum circuit. This is an efficiency criteria. QC-universal circuits have an arbitrary quantum input where a CC-universal is equivalent to a CQ'QC-universal, the inner operators are prepared Bell states. A QC-universal gate can select from any arbitrary quantum input, by preparing it as a classical correlation, or \( |\psi_{out}\rangle\, =\, U|\psi_{in}\rangle \). The CQ circuits represent a quantum-logic inversion of the QC circuits. In this sense there is also a set of operators that 'construct' a given circuit (apply mass, and momentum), to measure any states. You can combine four "EPR-complete" one-way operations in ways that confine these to a 2-state statistical structure, mapped over the dimension of the phase-space. We want to build circuits that can exploit EPR and Bell state correlations, in less than polynomial time.
P.S. James R, I deny your objective reality. ('cackle') Ed: I suppose I could get all compliant, and follow the rules here. But it has occured to me, that this site would need to block every other server in the world, to prevent the blatant pup-sockys...
disease: Good luck. You won't be the first to try that. Goodbye. At this point, you may continue to use Vkothii, when that name's present ban expires. Creation of further sock puppets will result in your permanent banning under all names.
