The two state solution fate

but I don't think I'm in first place. I just think I'm better and smarter than you. you really need to get your head out of your ass and learn to listen.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yeah I know your not that fucking smart.

considering what you consider to be intelligent I really would have to ask you to not insult him like that.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes, I know you think your are legend in your own mind, and whipped the Big Bad Buffalo.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Oh look ,pj know some grown up words, ain't that cute, he sound like a little grown up man....:roflmao:

Yes, intellegent enough to nail you correctly:

 

grow up and quit using smilies.

lol. you haven't nailed me correctly. Your guesses are about my life and reasons for my actions are as far from the truth as possible.



and please refrain form taking credit for someone elses alleged accomplishment.

 

there is a word for people like you, who when repeatedly told something and still don't get it. That word is stupid. You don't know shit about me or what I think of anything.

 

And there are words for people like you grasshopper.

 

Behold now he enters the no-sense zone.

 

The personal attacks are really inappropriate.

 

the Jews saved me, the Arabs wanted to kill me

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLEt1Gpx39w

 

there are jews that would have killed him( like you) there are jews that would have saved him. there are arabs that would have killed him there are arabs that would have saved him.

 

The Arabs tired to kill him, they were the ones who attacked him in the first palce and after he ws down, they were ready to put a bullit into his brain.

The Israelis in their actions seem to show that your chances for survival are much better with them even after you shoot at them.

 

Really? Why? Because they kill only 1300 for every 3?

 

generalizing like that is bigoted. I suppose if I were to use your logic it would mean all rightwingers are stupid because you are.

 

Explain to me who attacked and then tried to kill the man after he was wounded?

Explain the flying lessons given Fatah members in Gaza by Hamas when they staged their coup?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvSMlPaD_Zo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1M4eH9Kk7I&feature=related

Hamas - Gaza - Palestinians - Fatah - Israel - Khaled Abu Hi...
Jul 15, 2007 ... Throwing handcuffed prisoners to their deaths from Gaza’s highest (and most ... But his journey is Gaza’s journey, from Fatah fighter and Israeli ... ruins of the buildings of the Executive Force, which he helped Hamas build ... At least 160 Palestinians, most of them Fatah, died in that week of war ...

www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/magazine/15HAMAS-t.html - Similar pages

 

Explain why Israel has ignored avery resolution passed by the UN except 181?

 

Because the Arabs ignored U.N.181 in the begining.

And every call for peace ever since.

Hamas is still ignoring U.N. 181, and U.N.242.

Even in the last exchange, Hamas ignored the U.N.

 

Because Palestine is a lie.

http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/where-is-palestine-638461.html

The Committee for Accurate Reporting of the Middle East in America (CAMERA) succinctly summarises this reality as follows:

 

what a surprise buffalo uses a propaganda website for info. referring to transjordan as part of historic palestine is dishonest and bullshit idea.

 

U.N. Resolution 181 is a United Nations Security Council Resolution, which has weight of law behind it, as per U.N. Charter, when the Arabs rejected U.N.S.R. 181 it became a moot point.

http://www.mythsandfacts.com/Conflict/10/UN-resolutions.pdf

The UN Secretary-General, the General Assembly, and now the international Court of Justice (ICJ) seem ignorant of the General Assembly’s powers or perhaps prefers to ignore them. These UN organs even fail to note that “affirmation” means merely a declarative statement of sentiment. It is not a directive. It is not law.

In any case, this and a host of other anti-Israel resolutions passed annually are not legally binding documents by any measure. One does not even have to be an experienced judge to see this; one need only to read the UN Charter to establish this fact. Article 10 of the UN Charter states:

“The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters.” [italics by author].


Past members of the ICJ have gone on record as underscoring that the UN Charter does not grant the General Assembly (or the International Court of Justice, for that matter) authority to enact or amend international law.
Professor Judge Schwebel, former President of the International Court of Justice, has stated that:

“… the General Assembly of the United Nations can only, in principle, issue ‘recommendation’ which are not of a binding character, according to Article 10 of the Charter of the United Nations.”2

Schwebel also cites the (1950) opinion of Judge, Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, a former member judge of the International Court of Justice, who declared that:
“… the General Assembly has no legal power to legislate or bind its members by way of recommendation.”3

Yet another former ICJ judge, Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice has been just as resolved in rejecting what he labeled the “illusion” that a General Assembly resolution can have “legislative effect.”4
Academics and renowned international law experts also agree. Professor Julius Stone illuminates this subject by pointing out:
“In his book The Normative Role of the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Declaration of Principles of Friendly Relations, Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz5 is led to conclude that the General Assembly lacks legal authority either to enact or to ‘declare’ or ‘determine’ or ‘interpret’ international

© 2007, Eli E. Hertz Page 2 of 4 UN Resolutions
law so as legally to bind states by such acts, whether these states be members of the United Nations or not, and whether these states voted for or against or abstained from the relevant vote or did not take part in it.”6

IN A NUTSHELL

1 Dore Gold, “Baseless Comparisons: UN Security Council Resolutions on Iraq and Israel,” Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, September 24, 2002, at .http://www.jcpa.org/brief/brief2-7.htm
2 Professor, Judge Stephen M. Schwebel, What Weight to Conquest? in “Justice in International Law”, Cambridge University Press, 1994. Judge Schwebel has served on the International Court since 15 January 1981. He was Vice-President of the Court from 1994 to 1997 and has been President from 1997 to 2000. A former Deputy Legal Adviser of the United States Department of State and Burling Professor of International Law at the School of Advanced International Studies of The Johns Hopkins University (Washington). Judge Schwebel is the author of several books and over 150 articles on problems of international law and organization. He is Honorary President of the American Society of International Law. Opinions quoted in this critiques are not derived from his position as a judge of the ICJ.
3 Ibid.
4 Cited in “Israel and Palestine, Assault on the law of nations,” Professor Julius Stone, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981. p. 29.
5 Professor Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz “The United Nations declaration on friendly relations and the system of the sources of international law” Publisher: Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands; Germantown, Md.: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979. ISBN: 902860149X.
6 Professor Julius Stone (1907-1985), “Israel and Palestine, Assault on the Law of Nations” The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981, p. 127. The late Professor Julius Stone was recognized as one of the twentieth century's leading authorities on the Law of Nations. His work represents a detailed analysis of the central principles of international law governing the issues raised by the Arab-Israel conflict. He was one of a few scholars to gain outstanding recognition in more than one field. Professor Stone was one of the world’s best-known authorities in both Jurisprudence and International Law.