Rape victim, 13, stoned to death - and you guessed it...

No, more like, oh you slit some two year olds throats? Nah, heres some more money, try and keep it low key when you commit genocide. And don't worry, there's lots more where that came from.

Same for Siad Barre. He's may be a bitch, but he's our bitch. So what if he mass murders his own people? No WMDs there, brother. Here's another 500 million dollars for next year. <repeat for 25 years>

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Owing to its almost entire dependence upon the monsoon rains, India is more liable than any other country in the world to crop failures, which upon occasion deepen into famine.[1] There were 14 famines in India between 11th and 17th century (Bhatia, 1985). For example, during the 1022-1033 Great famines in India entire provinces were depopulated. Famine in the Deccan and Gujarat killed at least 2 million people in 1630-32.


British devised the first ever famine scales and engaged themselves in a series of canal building and irrigation improvements. The results were that the mortality rate decreased rapidly.
*******************
2 million died 1n the 1630 to 1632 period, & sam guess what the british were not even there, SO WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THAT?

& the british introduced canal building and irrigation improvements that lead to less mortality.

Sam should the british have imported american indians to do rain dances in time of drought, & then non rain dances to stop the rain in time of severe monsoons?

You like to blame anyone but yourselves, the british cant control the rain, they also cant stop indians breeding to 50 children a family, there are prices to pay for over breeding its called poverty & famine, to this day china has a one child policy to stop guess what poverty.
I am sure india never has adapted such a law, you like to breed like rabbits all well & good if you are rich, but if you are poor thats called fucking stupid.
Britains population has stayed


britains population in 1800 was 10 million, our population today is about 67 million.


India's population will be 1.5 billion in 20 years.

india's annual increase of nearly 19 million contributes
far more to annual world population growth than any other country.

Sam your country is breeding faster than any other country your country has no regard of the fact that your country is one of the poorest in the world, & you have the cheek to ask why you have famine there?
Blame it on the british, when we took over india our population was about 15 million, yours over 250 million are you telling me 250 million cant fight 15, 000 british soldiers, you are having a laugh are you not?????


Your country outnumbered mine by 25 to 1 yet you still give up to the british who travelled 5000 miles in fucking boats, your either the biggest cowards in world history or you wanted us there.


15,000 troops against 255 million indians, & we were only there to stop the french take india, or else guess what you would all be speaking fucking french today then would you all be, no use for french telemarketers is there?
English is the worlds language we did you all a fucking favour, because if the french had suceeded you would like laos today or ghana or some over disaster french ex-colony, there is not one single sucess story of any french colony, they looted, built no infrastructure then pissed off.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The policy of todays west is good in africa & latin america & asia, the policy of china & russia is not, we give aid to try & help the lesser of the multiple loony wanabee governments all these countries, we supply aid to the starving, but there is no win situation there all barabaric loonies who like to loot & kill, what do we do igonore the starving masses like russia & china & the oil rich middle east do?
Or do we continue to try & help the starving & maybe push the nicer of the 5 loony dictators into office?

Me i think we should try at least to push the dictator who is a liitle less insane than the others into office, sitting on the fence just leads to a bloodbath of millions while our populations demand action to help these people.

But the bottom line is how do you help insane people?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

India is a very large country. There was excess food when the British were exporting it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/dec/27/eu.turkey

 

BS. The Chinese build infrastructure, not fund genocides. They sign contracts. Not bomb people. Both Russia and China have been allied to India for several years, the Americans barely put a foot in and farmers started committing suicide from their trade policies.

 

You mean like the chinese weapons sent during a worldwide arms embargo to sudan, & the ship filled with weapons that the kenyans signed for to beat the embargo which was also destined for sudan?

China is after minerals, commodities, oil, coal if a african country has none china takes no interest, get your facts right.

Russia is allied to no one including there own people who are expendible & killed whenever they speak out of line or own property or businesses they wont sign over to kremlin prick masquerading as a businessman.

Russia & china is exporting weapons to every dangerous country in the world, & nuclear technology to iran, north korea & now burma.

 

The US sells 50% of the worlds weapons and you never hear a peep from vincent about it.
Country Spending ($b.) %GDP[
1 United States 528.7 3.99
2 United Kingdom 59.2 2.49
3 France 53.1 2.38
4 People's Republic of China 49.5[1] 1.88
5 Japan 43.7 1.00

 

best post so far.

welcome to sciforums soap where we will thoroughly cleanse you.

as if there isn't anybody else "perpetuating the stereotype".

sam,
so how much is india willing to shell out for a piece of somali pie?

 

Nothing at all, that I can find. Apparently we are not even bidding, which is really odd.

 

America is a very large country so is australia, there populations range from 325 million to 20 million, excess food when the brits arrived?

The 2 million who died in the 1630 famine, clearly shows that if the brits were there or not, millions would still die during times of great famine.

Your out of control population has everything to do with it, you fail to answer my question how does 15,000 brits travelling 5000 miles in boats, defeat 255 million indians?

Would you prefer speaking french today?

Would you prefer speaking only indian, no english today? if so where would your country be today?

I mean if the french were heading for india 1st, did we not do you a favour?

Have you ever been to laos?
I have another french colony, to describe it as backward would be kind, there are no cinema's, no supermarkets, they make $3 a day if they work most dont, to think that would be india to today if the french were allowed to take india.

 

They were exporting food for their military campaigns while people were dying, don't really care what their measly justifications were or who did what to others.

 

How much food/grain does India export, SAM? ...while practically the whole fuckin' nation of India is starving to death? Can you answer that one for us?

Baron Max

 

then why would the US fear india when she isn't interested?
china doesn't matter either because shes largely socialist and the russians are at somalia too.

the only possible solution is to allow the UN to take over, if that's even possible.
last time the UN was there she was run out.

and so it goes . . .

 

I am well aware of these figures, my point was about the countries that are either banned from receiving weapons or are very dangerous countries that no sane country deals with them.

Sudan, iran, north korea, burma, & a load of other crazy african countries, china & russia are the ones dealing with them.

The british are number 3 largely because of deals with middle east oil countries, the saudis, kuwait etc, we do billions each year with them in weapons,as do the americans, they dont buy from russia because they know all russian military hardware is crap, only despots buy from them.

So take away the middle east & the americans & the uk would not be top, all though america does some serious trade with asia, japan, thailand, korea, etc.

 

Thats a good point, just why is india exporting food while the masses starve?
Why has india spent billions on getting nukes & putting a bin in space for there space programme while they recieved $500 million off the uk last year in aid to stop children dying.

Why?
Why?

 

i don't know.

see above.

 

It brings sadness to my heart reading that article.

 

Then perhaps you should stay away from any world or local newscasts or newspapers! If you're around them much, you poor heart will be fucked up for sure for all time.

Baron Max

 

Remember when India stopped exporting rice last year because we needed it at home?

India Keeps Homegrown Rice to Feed Its Hungry Millions

India may not be a player in Somalia, but if the US wasn't funding a war there to keep its contracts safe, it would be. India and China [not to mention the Arab countries and Russia] are investing heavily in African resources

 

So, ....let's see now, ....does that mean that Indians only began starving to death only last year??? Duh! Now that's funny, SAM.

So am I to believe that now, as of this year, there are no starving Indians in all of India? Everything is now wonderful and manna is flowing from heaven onto India's soil?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Baron Max