UFO News

Story 1
WASHINGTON, USA - A military helicopter was photographed pursuing a super fast UFO in Washington State, America last week
http://www.australia.to/story/0,25197,23040467-289,00,00.html

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Story 2
UFO spotted by police helicopter

The helicopter crew spotted the aircraft earlier this month
A police helicopter crew has spotted what is described as an unusual aircraft in the Vale of Glamorgan.

The helicopter was above St Athan, which is home to an RAF base and close to Cardiff International Airport.

But three-man crew could not capture any images before the object vanished over the Bristol Channel on 8 June.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7465041.stm



story 3


A British man who used a low speed dial-up connection from his girlfriend's aunt's house to hack into the Pentagon's computers made an appeal in the British House of Lords on Monday not to be extradited to the United States.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolo...id-over-hacking/2008/06/17/1213468371073.html

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Sightings (video) are picking up in huge way.
There's a new one almost every day and increasing.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

''He says, we are not alone...''

... in the words of Dana Scully, in reporting to Mulders superiors....

 

Digital cameras and camcorders are getting a lot cheaper and easier to get... so of course documented sightings are on the rise. Doesn't mean they are all legit UFO's though.

 

Won't change much, don't think.

All the video and film of the past fifty years, as well as all the sightings, testimonies, and other physical evidence, has never convinced skeptics, so an influx of new, possibly grainy video and still photo evidence from cheap cameras and cell phones is likely to move them not one inch.

It was suggested by someone on this very forum that cell phone cameras should be increasing the amount of UFO pictures if there were indeed something to the phenomenon. This person was a resident skeptic.
My thoughts are that it won't change a damn thing. Just the some ol' excuses to dismiss those pictures from the past will be reused for anything more recent.

 

What he claimed to have seen is highly interesting.

 

British civilians hacking into American military computers with ease? Very strange indeed.

I don't like it, even if he was searching for "non-existant" technology. I think its possible that some one intentially made the security to these military and NASA computers weak so something like this could happen. OR It was better defended than he is saying... just to cover his ass. Perhaps there was information other than what is he talking about.

Lets pretend that this "anti-gravity free energy" stuff is real, could humanity really handle such technology in its greedy little paws? I doubt it.

 

Look, let's be honest here. A military hellicopter racing after some high-speed aerodynamical vehical??? They wouldn't do that. It's perfectly illogical. What could be more plausible however, is that the UFO was created by the American Government, and then chased by the hellicopter as some kind of governmental experiment.

 

British UFO sightings at 'bizarre' levels

"Whether alien activity or natural phenomena, reports of UFOs have flooded in this summer from across the country. "
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...ritish-UFO-sightings-at-'bizarre'-levels.html

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Higher prevalence of recording devices should lead to increased number of recordings, ... if there is actually something to record.

Cellphone cameras cannot however capture delusions. So if we are not seeing more pictures and videos, I think the point is clear.

 

Ever scrutinize Pseudoscience much? You're like an attack dog. Right on cue.

I don't think delusions have much to do with it. It really doesn't matter what was seen or photographed in the past, nor what the increase in volume of that material might bring. The end result is always predictable.

Oh, that dark grouping of pixels???

 

Pseudoscience doesn't get many posts, so new ones kinda stick out. It doesn't take Fox Mulder to notice that.

Evidence is the key, and so far, all of it is lacking. We've been down this route before, with you clinbing to debunked stories, so I don't want to do it again.

Indeed, why are UFO pictures and videos so crap?

 

Phlog, have you ever seen the Mexican airforce videos? How about the Nasa tether footage?
There are some very convincing private videos as well, many of which cannot be "debunked" by trained professional video analysts.
Not to say they are Alien beings, but they're certainly alien objects that are beyond our ability to identify them.

 

Yes, and they were discussed here. Crap quality, just blobs of light, with not enough information to tell size, shape, or anything useful.

I met one of the astronauts who conducted some tether experiments on the space shuttle. He never mentioned UFOs and there was nothing out of the ordinary on the footage he showed us. There was debris, probably ice, or from thruster activity, but no UFOs.

Most do not display controlled flight, and all are crappy quality. I've made my own fake UFO footage as good as the stuff that gets served up seriously.

 

A military helicopter was photographed pursuing a super fast UFO

So, how can a helicopter pursue a super fast UFO unless the helicopter was also super fast?

 

That's a dumb question for a smart guy like yourself. A police cruiser(car) has no chance in catching an 1100 rice rocket, yet that doesn't stop them from trying (and endagering lives and tax dollars in the process). And like the some superbike riders like to toy with the cops, maybe it was toying with the chopper. (when dealing in "fiction" anything's possible)

 

I would be interested to see them, really. I love that stuff. (as if you couldn't tell)

 

You're making fallacious comparisons.

 

Another silly comment. This whole subject is fallacious to you, I suspect.