wet1, why did you close the chickpix thread? You might take the mass opinion of the users before doing that... Folks do chickpix threads annoy you?
Personally, I fully endorse chick pix... But I think wet1 is trying to maintain a certain level of restraint throughout this forum. I'm a reformed "waste-of-time" threader who has come to understand the trials of message-board moderators. Wet1 might say something like: "Sciforums is a place for thoughtful exchange. There are plenty of other places online for chick pix and the like." How am I doing, Wet1?
Let's pretend the moderators are dragons. And then let's quote someone ( I think Hickman/Weis from Dragonlance ): "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and tasty with ketchup" Stop questioning stuff. Sure you might disagree..but they're the mods. They're doing all they do in the forums' best interest anyway.
I sell my vote for a good porn moviePlease Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Haha, yes of course. How IS the porno in latvia? Easily accessed? good quality? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Leeching away the bandwidth of other sites is a pretty bastardly thing to do. Why don't you just go and look at the image site? Besides, posting images doesn't constitute discussion, and this is a discussion site.
one picture is worth a thousand words... nono- I agree with you, Porfiry. Can't show a gorgeous chick when explaining that the Earth really orbits around the Sun - why don't you post links to chick pages instead, Zero?
Porfiry, posting links to chick pic urls is one of the many concessions I am willing to make to make this live. What I'm trying to create here is a place where one can see visual candy but where hardcore is weeded out. A decent eyecandy exchange place.
I posted in the Chick Pic thread a few times. At the time I thought it was okay. But now I dont think that its right. Your eating up other peoples bandwidth, your posting images that arent work safe (a bikini is not work safe, trust me). I stand by the moderators decision to close it, sorry.
Sorry dude, gots to agree with the mods Zero: Use google if you want softcore porn. Really. It's not only demeaning but it leeches into other people's bandwith. And in keeping with my own personal philosophy that if you're going to be degrading, go all out: If it's nae hardcore, it's nae crap.
I'm sure Dubya and Dick Cheney and all the gang would consider you the ideal American citizen, Nenar. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
cmon porf wasnt that your fave thread?? i got some really killer chicks just dying to be posted on your site Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
again!! for the last time. The chick hunk area has nothing to do with degrading or offending. Hardcore has no place here. It's all about celebrating the beauty of the human body, not sick poses. I find no aesthetic pleasure in a hardcore scene, but there is plenty of aesthetic pleasure in a scantily clad (and HOT) model.
Zero: Please re-read my post: I never condemned it. I simply noted that it's demeaning. No offense was meant or intended, I simply observed that it was degrading and quipped that - oh, fuck you. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
