Universe for Observer

Yes, I think that is a plausible theory

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Overall perhaps it doesn't make much difference though, but it's nice to have a more clear view of what happens at that level, pretty dynamic, not at all the fixed atoms that we usually imagine it to be.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's silly, since the interpretation holds that the observation collapse the wavefunction (copenhagen), so if the observer is in a cloud of probabilities or not doesn't matter (as the observer is a cloud of probabilities along with the rest of the universe, and that it is the observation that collapses it).

This theory isn't about that, it is about how the universe is so finely tuned, HOW, not WHY.

Well, this theory is for the copenhagen interpretation, which is the most widely used (so that we don't have to worry about multiple universes and such).

I'm a part of it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

There can only be one universe, cause the universe is all there is. Nothing can be outside of it. Whether there are multiple realities or dimensions within the universe is something else entirely. The universe is infinite in size and complexity, and we'll never know all about it, but don't go around saying there is many of them, cause then you have a wrong definition of it alltogether.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

There can only be one reality, but there could be several universes existing as potentials. The problem with the multiverse theory is that there is no limits to the amount of them as we can see, which means that everything possible is happening in different universes, which means that there are several you and me, and that contradicts our identity (since there can only be one "I").

Therefor I believe that there is only one real universe, but that there could be others that aren't real, existing as potentials only.