The Existentialism of Fellatio

Actually she did !!!
She wrote : not as a non-thing ........
A thing it inself = noumenon
A non-thing = a non-noumenoun
Not as a non-thing = not as a non-noumenon = noumenon

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

:m:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

In theory I have. Kant was a good little Platoan who believed form was the thing-itself processed.

And so, what is Cortex Collusum but an exercise of a moderator deconstructing a form to its true thing-itself and exhibiting the truth with its pants down?


Cortex:

Do not edit your first post. First warning.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Can we, for once, stay on topic...Blowjobs!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thank you!!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You rock, Gendy.

 

IMO she should be removed from moderator position......

 

It would really help me understand the OP if someone could contrast fellatio with cunnilingus using gendanken's terminology and/or, where needed, appropriate counterparts.

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

So.

 

Siphyllus:

*steepled fingers*

Really? Now why's that?

Cunnilingus is the act of sticking one's tounge in a woman.
Fellatio is the only reason you would.

 

Isn't it obvious? You spend so much time licking your own cunt that you're not sucking enough dicks.

Or something.

What about fisting? As I understand it, hoping for a fist is a good reason to stick one's tongue into a woman. Then again, I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that women don't really do this, and the idea of fisting is a sublimated homoerotic impulse men project onto lesbians.

Nonetheless, fellatio is very existential. Few times in life are more inspiring of reflection on the question of "Why am I here?" than when you have someone's cock stuffed in your mouth.

Although I do wonder why calling someone a cocksucker is supposed to be a pejorative. I mean, how many guys who insult one another with the word want nothing more than for someone to be their cocksucker.

So when most men who use the insult call someone a cocksucker, aren't they really calling that person something they want?

And what does this say about the cocksuckee's desires?

 

"And what does this say about the cocksuckee's desires?"

Apparently, they reflect a certain frustration with the lack of their fulfillment...

or,

that in a (insert religion or morally uptight) society, dicksucking is taboo and only lowly trash that we don't necessarily have to consider human would undertake such a disgusting (though entirely pleasureful on the part of the recipient at least) act.

all pejoratives are intended to dehumanize/distance when used as such, eh?

 

Not a good moderator...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Oh, now this is just forgetting the 'nice' men who want to control women in non-traditional ways.

In any case, this is hardly the language of the OP. I still find the OP, despite your constrast of fellatio and cunnilingus, hard to penetrate.

(see I can be a good straight man)