perpetual motion machine

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by theoneiuse, Dec 30, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. theoneiuse Theoneiuse Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    299
    challenge your brain how do you make such a machine
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. sly1 Heartless Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    692

    you dont.

    Closest one I've seen does 3 months of perpetual motion before it stops.

    There are alot of extremely efficient models out there but in terms of limitless free motion......dont think it exists on earth
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    It would make more sense to question how they Don't work since a number of people tend to not understand why their various contraptions can't run 'Perpetually'.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    That isn't a challenge, it's an impossibility to make such a device for everything eventually stops. Even the universe will one day stop expanding and die just as suns, galaxies and other celestial bodies.
     
  8. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    It always amuses me when one of these threads get started. That's because the original poster clearly has no idea how they are demonstrating just how limited their knowledge currently is. They've never heard of things like friction, power conversion losses and the second law of thermodynamics.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The solution to their problem is quite simple - stay in school because they still have a LONG way to go.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. BenTheMan Dr. of Physics, Prof. of Love Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,967
    (cut and paste from physics forum)

    The general reason given for the impossibility of a perpetual motion machine is the second law of thermodynamics.

    However, we could build an effectively perpetual motion machine, say, using solar cells---the second law doesn't hold when there is an external energy source. Ignoring things like stress on components of the engine, one could imagine building something that could run for, say, the lifetime of the sun. That would be pretty close.

    Perhaps you could build a spaceship that could travel from star to star in a galaxy, gathering enough solar energy at one start during its lifetime to make it to the next star. That could concievably last the age of a galaxy.

    In the real world though, things like stress and friction doom any engine to human intervention---people have to be around to fix shit when it breaks.
     
  10. Yorda Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,275
    Nikola Tesla said that things have no energy except from what they receive from the environment. Planets move forever because they receive energy from space. Eventually they die, and after a period of rest they are reborn. Ultimately, all energy comes from rest, death, nothingness.

    Cars are perpetual motion machines. You just fill the fuel and they can go forever. Until they break. Then you make a new one, and the the car can drive again. Forever. Almost everything are perpetual motion machines (wind generators for example)

    The universe is not a closed system, so the 2nd law of Thermodynamics does not apply to it. Life (atoms, galaxies, humans) is a perpetual motion creator, that keeps everything moving forever.
     
  11. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    That's a totally incorrect set of statements. Just by simple definition, nothing is a perpetual motion machine if you have to keep adding external energy to it. In the case of cars, the fuel comes from an external source; in the case of windmills, it comes from the sun.

    Apparently you have no real grasp of the second law since you said those things. :shrug:
     
  12. Yorda Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,275
    Things can't do anything if they don't receive energy from the environment, because it's the only source of energy... and the environment has infinite energy because the universe is infinite.
     
  13. Myles Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,553
    How pleased I am to hear that. I receive energy from the sun both directly and indirectly. I declare myself immortal.
     
  14. BenTheMan Dr. of Physics, Prof. of Love Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,967
    Ugh. You are aparently unfamiliar with the idea of a perpetual motion machine.
     
  15. Yorda Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,275
    energy can't be created or destroyed. when the universe was created, it wasn't created, it was just formed into a different form. the reason you can't destroy energy is because there is infinite (zero) energy. something minus infinity is infinity. and you can't add energy either.

    you can't convert light into enough useful energy, you have to eat. but even if you eat food, you will die later because your cells can't receive energy forever. but it doesn't matter if a car or a body breaks, we can always rebuild them.

    everything is forever, but nothing is forever in the same form.
    ---
    magnets receive energy from the environment. so you could build a perpetual motion machine with them... but that's no different than a perpetual motion machine that receives energy from the wind or sun forever.
    ---
    energy can't stay forever inside something. an apple receives energy from the tree which receives it from the earth which receives it from the infinite space source. the apple, tree and earth dies, but they are always reborn after getting energy from resting in the source of everything that is 'nothing', space.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2007
  16. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    Clearly it's as Ben said - you don't understand what a perpetual motion machine is. By definition, it does NOT receive power from anything. You start it up and it runs forever without getting additional energy.

    Therefore, there is NO such device in existence nor will there ever be.
     
  17. Yorda Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,275
    there is no such thing as a machine that receives no additional energy. all matter receives energy, that's why they have energy, existence, gravity and magnetism.
     
  18. dazzlepecs Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    76
    you could just set a perfectly balanced catherine wheel to spin forever in space lol, but as for a mechanical device on earth, suffering from gravity and friction it seems pretty unlikely
     
  19. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    Your first statement is correct; your second statement is non-scientific nonsense.
     
  20. saudade Unfiltered perspective... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    113
    Oh please... Don't you guys watch Invader Zim? *rolls eyes*
     
  21. Yorda Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,275
    if it's nonsense, explain where the earth got the energy to move itself around the sun. where did particles get their energy? if things wouldn't constantly receive energy, how could they move? could you do anything if you didn't get water and food?
     
  22. Myles Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,553
    The earth got its energy when the solar system was formed. Now check out what Newton says on the subject of gravity and motion in vacuuo.
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2008
  23. Boris2 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    no, you couldn't, as there is still friction in space or microgravity.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page