Dyslexia 'is just a middle-class way to hide stupidity'

Discussion in 'Science & Society' started by spidergoat, May 30, 2007.

  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    If dyslexia was really disguised stupidity, then IQ testing should show a correlation between dyslexia and low IQ. Apparently, it doesn't.

    Speaking from personal experience, I know dyslexics who are very intelligent.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Didn't you previously, in regard to IQ tests for blacks, argue that IQ tests were fucked up and shouldn't be used? Yet, here you are obviously saying that IQ tests are valuable tools for determining stupidity? What gives, James?

    Baron Max
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Yes, in regard to IQ tests for determining relative IQs by race.

    I have never argued that IQ tests are useless and meaningless. I have argued the more subtle point that IQ tests are not the be all and end all of intelligence. And, in particular, they are enormously flawed when people attempt to use them to establish some kind of racial superiority.

    Sometimes, Baron, you need to look beyond the simplistic level of "Either IQ tests are bad, or they're good." False dichotomies are just dumb.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Creative Fossil Banned Banned

    Messages:
    295
    The problem here is there are MANY true dyslexics and MANY people who just never learned how to read properly and those people are also now calling themself dyslexic and this is where the problem differentiating between the two arises.

    The fact is though that not being to read well is NOT evidence of 'stupid' whether the person be a true dyslexic or not.

    Reading is a learned skill and if you were never taught or never practiced it then you simply will be unlikely to do it well. It has nothing to do with intelligence levels.

    People with lower than average intelligence will have other difficulties aside from reading.
     
  8. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Yeah, use whatever you can, or want, to prove your point or disprove the other person's point ...but change your ideals when confronted with the same by another person using the same thing to prove a point that you don't like!

    I call that "pick n' choose", James ...if the info good for you, use it; if it's good for the other guy, disregard it. That's good, James, ...and it's what most people around here do, so you're not alone.

    Baron Max
     
  9. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    Baron Max:

    Yes, I "pick and choose" what IQ tests can and can't do. But not arbitrarily. I take an evidence-based approach.

    Note that a lack of correlation between IQ scores and dyslexia could mean one of three things, by the way:

    1. IQ tests are a true measure of intelligence, but dyslexia is not a lack of intelligence; or
    2. IQ tests don't really measure intelligence, and dyslexia is actually a lack of intelligence after all; or
    3. Both IQ tests AND dyslexia have nothing to do with intelligence.
     
  10. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    Really?
    But I think the point being made in the OP is that any neuroprocessing disorder is a form of stupidity. It is a mental deficiency. Sure, it does not necesarily correlate with a low "g" score, but in common parlence, it's stupidity. Don't forget, Moron, Imbecile, and Idiot were once part of the Intellegence classification scheme. Of course, this was back when speaking plainly was the norm.
     
  11. Satyr Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1,896
    Welcome to reality, spidergoat.

    You see in as culture where all must be included and none be made to feel excluded – creating unnecessary social frictions and disharmonies - every genetic deficiency, particularly those of the mind, are blamed on nurture or, when this is impossible, they are blamed on some kind of syndrome or disease or dysfunction.

    This way the dotards and imbeciles and all around retards can be given an excuse for their genetic mental inferiorities and all can be made to feel like no matter how stupid they are there’s always a hope that with the “correct” attention and schooling and “tests” all can score the same because….well, because we are all equal and only nurturing keeps us back or bad luck or tests that favor one group over another.

    So when a little retard is born what are you going to say to the parents?
    “Hey, you just passed on your inferior genes to your kid and you’ve reproduced a tiny version of yourselves. Yes he’s an imbecile!”

    No, what you do is offer them hope and a word that will arouse sympathy and compassion.
     
  12. heliocentric Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,117
    Same here, im actually pretty sure almost everyone has some writing oddity of some form or another. The label dyslexia like most labels applied within psychology only really come into being when these oddities of thought or patterns of behaviour become over-whelming and seriously start to negatively impact on your life.
     
  13. Dark520 Rebuilt Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    403
    Well of course; otherwise no one would care about them or complain about them enough to get them studied.
     
  14. guthrie paradox generator Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,089
    THe problem is that when I can find pages like these:

    http://www.dyslexia.com/science/different_pathways.htm
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/02/10/dyslexia.ap/index.html

    without any problem, I tend to think that the Durham phsychologist is mostly wrong. Yes, some parents like nice little labels to excuse their childrens problems. But in reality peoples brains end up wired differently, and we have given the lable dyslexia to a bundle of behaviours that come from having a brain wired a bit differently from average.
    One person I know, intelligent and geeky, only learnt to read properly once they gave him tinted glasses. With the correct lenses in them the words stopped jumping up and down.
     
  15. CANGAS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,612
    And speaking from my own personal experirence with people who are aixelsyd, I know dyslexics who are crooked jerks, probably to try to compensate for their relative stupidity.
     
  16. Exploradora Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    264
    Huh? All of these terms have to do with IQ scores- INCLUDING stupidity. Actually it is a refrence to "lacking intellegence". Now multiple intelligence theory aside, we measure intellect through IQ tests. However limited and archaic they may be, we have few other measures. If dyslexia is stupidity, then dyslexic people would have lower IQ scores. We have established this as not being true. I have dyslexia, and I suppositely have an IQ score in the top 1% (or .1%? I can't remember... I'm dyslexic

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    )... I personally think I am a good example of how IQ tests are flawed... but anyway.

    If stupidity is referring to brain dysfunction then you would have to consider people with OCD, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, migraines, and stuttering as being stupid. Clearly all of these conditions have little or no correlation to intelligence.
     

Share This Page