Could any man made contraption blow up the Earth?

Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by John J. Bannan, Jul 2, 2007.

  1. John J. Bannan Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,471
    We all saw Star Wars, when the death star blows up a planet. Can man actually devise anything that would blow up a planet?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. original sine Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    924
    I certainly believe that we could.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. srikar Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    66
    There is no need of devices,
    we can blow with our activities
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. John J. Bannan Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,471
    Well, couldn't we use a rocket to move a very large near Earth object's orbit so that it crashes with the Earth? Of course, it probably wouldn't be big enough to blow up the Earth.
     
  8. Orleander OH JOY!!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    25,817
    You mean if we knocked the moon out of its orbit and crashed it into earth?? It might end life, but I don't know if it would make the earth blow up.
     
  9. Communist Hamster Cricetulus griseus leninus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,026
    I don't think we can currently, but if we made it the primary focus of our species we chould manage it within the century.
     
  10. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    Lets be generous and agree that "blowing up" the earth only requires that it be broken into two pieces of substantial size. Has anyone calculated the amount of energy needed? I don't see how we could produce it.

    Changing the orbit of an asteroid so it would hit us would, in itself, require a huge amount of energy. But for it to hit us hard enough to fracture the planet would mean that it was moving pretty fast to begin with. Ignoring the semantics of whether we "made that contraption" when it already had the necessary kinetic energy to do the job, changing the orbit of a fast-moving asteroid would require an even huger amount of energy.

    The moon is moving at a good clip relative to us, 20,000mph. But that motion is precisely at a right angle to the direction needed for a collision. We couldn't possibly generate enough power to alter its course by 90 degrees and crash it into the Earth anytime soon.

    Nuclear bombs maybe? All the bombs we already have, if piled together and detonated, wouldn't make a crater more than several miles deep, if that big.

    I don't think we can do it.

    And ya know, I feel pretty good about that.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Hip Hop Skeptic Registered Member

    Messages:
    74
    It would be really challenging.

    If we did not succeed at first, it might be too hard to try again.
     
  12. phonetic stroking my banjo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,157
    I like the idea of a huge piece of metal. Like a big, solid corkscrew. This thing would be about a quarter of a mile across, with fins so that it would spin like mad as it dropped out of the sky.

    The idea is - take it up to the edge of the atmosphere and drop it. Or sixteen around the world. It will gain speed, spin like crazy and hopefully make a big hole in the earth. Unlikely, but hey, I think it would be cool.
     
  13. oreodont I am God Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    520
    As a geologist an unqualified

    NO.the dedicated application of our technology would amount to no more than leaning a grain of sand against Mt. Everest and expecting Everest to collapse. The mass of the Earth and the energy holding it together will be here until the Sun turns into a big BBQ in 5 or so billion years.
     
  14. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,559
    Paul Dixon believes that we could turn the Earth into a supernova via Fermilab experiments.

    It's been hypothesized that CERN's LHC might create strangelets, which would release a huge amount of fusion energy if they persisted/escaped, and explode the planet.
     
  15. Sci-Phenomena Reality is in the Minds Eye Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    869
    I think they already have such explosives.

    but whats even worse is weapons which could wipe out life without destroying buildings and of course... the earth
     
  16. Tnerb Banned Banned

    Messages:
    7,917
    Sucks to even discuss it.
     
  17. andbna Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    316
    Or faster: via Nova Bombs!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Seriously, of blowing up the earth, the best idea sofar seems to be redirecting an asteroid. The energy required wouldn't necessarily be that great: If it were a long distance away, we may only need to change its momentum slightly to produce a huge change in its course. The major problems would be the precise measurements needed to directe it toward earth. It may require 'course corrections' too due to the finite precision of our instruments, thus perhaps a few shuttle teams full of nukes could do it given quite a few years...

    Blowing it into 2 halves seems to be the least likely solution (and sounds like Armaggeddon meets The Core) The tremendous amount of energy needed even to make 2 halves move apart at any appreciable rate is big eanough. Add in the fact that it's 'bound' together makes it even harder. Furthurmore you would have to make sure it fragmented rather than just made 2 large volcanos releiving the pressure (although that would do plenty of damage, but not accomplish our goal.)

    Another methode may be to slow the earth down and let it fall into the sun, via perhaps detonating bombs on one side against its orbit path, however that too would require much too massive amounts of energy I think.
    Perhaps however if we used our re-directed asteroid's momentum to accomplish this, via some hybrid approach we could get somewhere... Mercury might be a good planet to test on due to its small mass, though it orbits faster because it's closer to the sun, it's overall momentum, I think, should be less.

    -Andrew
     
  18. Hip Hop Skeptic Registered Member

    Messages:
    74
    Id say we just place nuclear and atom bombs strategically within the eraths crust. If we used like 10000000 bombs of the mentioned types woulndt that be enough?

    And like I said it would be difficult to try again if we failed. So it would be important to make the first time a success. We would have to underestimate our technology alot to succeed.
     
  19. John J. Bannan Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,471
    That's a lot of bombs. Why not make one bomb the size of the Earth. That should do it.
     
  20. oreodont I am God Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    520
    No. That would be a pinprick. Add a couple zeros and it would still be a pinprick.

    People confuse blowing up the Earth with destroying life. Life is irrelevent to the existense of the Earth.
     
  21. eburacum45 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,297
    To blow up the Earth, as per the Star Wars movie, would require a precise amount of energy- 2.4 x 10e32 joules. A megatonne of TNT liberates 4.184×10e9 Joules; so to blow up the earth would need 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 hundred megatonne bombs.
     
  22. the Radio Star Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8
    No. The Earth is too massive. The energy needed to destroy the Earth in this way is roughly equal to the amount the Sun releases in a week. We can't harnest that much energy, and probably never will.
     
  23. alexb123 The Amish web page is fast! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,238
    We cannot even drill down to anywhere near the core of the earth. So if we can't do that then blowing up the earth is many steps more advanced.
     

Share This Page