For the Creationists

So, LG et al, perhaps there is a necessity to rename it to "Intelligent Project Management"? Also, I'm glad you made the mistake of "project manager steering committee". You do realise you simply re-expanded your own argument of 'one' right back to 'many'?

Fighting this point is a farce. Logic does not dictate that there must be only one designer if any at all.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Creationism is a wish. A fantasy. Nothing more.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Abiogenesis is essentially creationism, as both are mysteries, don't you agree?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A murder is also a mystery if there are no suspects...what's your point IAC?

 

One is seen as fantasy, the other as fact yet to be proven, by most mainstream scientists.

 

Abiogenesis doesn't posit a magic man, rather the action of molecules which we would have never understood if we listened to religious authority figures, who are, for some reason, against people finding things out.

 

Totally untrue.

 

So abiogenesis does pose a magical being IAC?

 

Essentially, as scientists have no idea how it would have happened by natural means.

 

Creationism is a Myth.! Every tribe, every Culture and every Civilisation that has ever existed on this world had it's own version of Genesis.

What is the mathematical probablity of everything created in one day.?

The same mathematical odds of a Hurricane blazing it's way through a junkyard and in the process assembling a fully functional Boeing 747..!!

The chances of something like that happening could be 1 followed by hundred trillion zeros to the power of 1 followed by hundred trillion zeros..!!

On the other hand, Evolution is more Logical, methodical and ofcourse fossil and Genetic evidence also exists.

 

First you say it isn't proven, which is true, then you say they have no idea, which isn't.

 

The problem I had with your statement is that it alludes to (your thinking) that both abiogenesis and creation are mysteries, thus they are the same.

 

They are the same in the sense that life was created from non-life somehow.

 

And yet it was under the supervision of one person or body.

 

Saquist...

The "or body" part is where you're falling down. Microsoft is that body that heralded any version of Windows. Even Bill Gates himself can't be 100% credited with the Microsoft empire or else Steve Balmer wouldn't be getting any money. Matter of fact, MS DOS was bought outright from a "third designer" if you will.

The "or body" part is the caveat, the trump card that will hide the "many designer" requirement in a collective singular.

 

You're attempting to distinguish the head from the body members. It was one organization and that organization still exist today just as it did in 1985. With out that organization and control of the body memebers we would not have windows of which thousands of programs are based upon.

In the end they all had to submit to Microsoft design scheme and format.

 

God isn't alive? God is dead? I'm shocked at your sudden honesty!

 

Didn't the figure out that gases at the right mixture struck by lightning created protein or something of the sorts?

 

Hey spidergoat, Provita appears to be a prime recruit for you, fill him in on the details.

 

So God is a committee???
So God is a project manager and doesn't know squat about the individual creations...
So it is Gods then...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!