Lost Kingdoms of Cantre'r Gwaelod/Lyonesse/Avalon

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by IceAgeCivilizations, Feb 11, 2007.

  1. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    It's real history, the timeframe is the debate, and the indications are circa 1500 B.C., good day.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. SkinWalker Archaeology / Anthropology Moderator

    Messages:
    5,874
    The debate exists only in your mind.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Since this thread involves real alternative science, Skinwalker has tossed it into the dustbin marked "pseudoscience." Yes, there are alternative theories to the "mainstream" theories and current scientific theory is largely garbage theory backed by the most domineering people in science.
     
  8. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    It makes Skin's head hurt.
     
  9. SkinWalker Archaeology / Anthropology Moderator

    Messages:
    5,874
    "Real alternative science," eh?

    There is no "alternative" to science. Its either science or it isn't. When it isn't, its called pseudo-science.
     
  10. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    If the Skinster doesn't agree with it, it's automatically pseudo-science, he's not very secure in his positions, obviously.
     
  11. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Painfully obviously.
     
  12. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    And since the Skinster is above the mere "pseudo-science" which I present, then why does he bother to comment here, since he's only concerned with "real science, and this is under "pseudo-science?"

    The Skinster must actually see merit in much of the "pseudo-science," as you see it threatens his obviously fragile intellectual facade.
     
  13. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Some part of him sees it, and the struggle is sort of interesting.
     
  14. nietzschefan Thread Killer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,721
    Frankly "real" science DOES have a problem. Particularly in the realm of Archeology. They seem to be pretty picky about what is "allowed" to be investigated. They just found a "Pygmy" skull in Indonesia and are damn close to just classifying a whole new sub-species for it. BASED on ONE skull.

    The Smithsonian tried to lose "Peking man", but didn't think the chinese/Europeans would be meticulous enough to make a cast of him. Right, because only westerners can truely fuck up a find like that. We should consider ourselves so lucky evidence was too abundant of homo erectus and that Weidenreichian casts survived the Smithsonian and U.S government Purgings(well they couldn't quite get their hands on them could they?). So they admit that one.

    Then we have 100s (perhaps 1000s of NAmerican, at the "Smithsonian") of bones of pre-historic "giant" bones from all over the world. Some they couldn't quite cover up like the complete skull of a 12' giant still on display in Arizona. Still no "classification" on these species. hmmm bias perhaps in some modern sciences? Explanations forced out of them...gigantisism...freak mutation. What about the constant recurrence of red hair and double teeth...oh you are a loon....you have no longer any credentials and will not work and any "reputable" University. Screw modern science.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2007
  15. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    King Og circa 1200 B.C. is said to have been about 12 feet tall, and of course, other mentions of giants in the Bible, and in many ancient legends, corroborated by those giant bones you mention.

    The giant Fomorians, probably Canaanites, who fought against Partholon's arriving forces circa 1500 B.C., lived in the Cornwall region, probably mining tin there, and building Stonehenge and many other of the megaliths of England.
     
  16. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    If you want Science to relate to anything you ever suggest, never include "the Bible" as a source.
     
  17. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    The Bible was right about the Hittites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Tarshish, Jericho, Sumer, Haran, and much more, so why not?
     
  18. JoojooSpaceape Burn in hell Hippies Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    498
    The bible also dictates that you should sever the body part from your body which you use to sin lest it corrupt the rest of your body. For it is far better to lose a part of your body than the entire body (this is figurative of course). I suggest you sever your head, good sir, before it corrupts the rest of an otherwise perfectly functional body.
     
  19. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Then why did not the Apostles sever their own heads?
     
  20. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Really? Where does it say that?
     
  21. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    IceAgeCivilizations:

    As I pointed out in the other thread, Avalon is not held to be submerged. It is not an Atlantis myth. Rather, it is a myth more along the lines of "the mythical land to the West".
     
  22. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    I don't think I'll take your word for it, thanks though.
     
  23. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214

Share This Page