User infractions - yes or no?

Hell, let's make it so that the rules and guidelines are posted as the signature to every post in the forum.
That'll larn us.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

poll closed.

15 say get rid of it.

14 say keep it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

can i vote twice?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

you can have my vote.

 

A 'STFU' button would be quite good. If somebody is advertising or making a nuisance of themselves in general you'd hit the 'STFU' button.

Depending on the number of 'STFU's received, different punishments would be handed out. An example -

1 'STFU' = After posting you'd have to wait 5 minutes to post again.
2 'STFU' = You'd have to wait 15 minutes, your avatar would change to a dunce hat.
3 'STFU' = 30 minutes, dunce hat avatar and derogatory user title.
4 'STFU' = 24 hour ban and added to a wall of shame.

 

I like that idea. I like it a lot. Similar progressive humiliation should be used for those who set out to bore us, or who use big words without understanding what they mean (both far greater sins in my eyes than spammed ads or trolling teens).

 

what about trolling adults, such as myself?

 

IRRELEVANT! TROLL!

Sorry, I thought I was kul xil for a second there.

 

wanna fight?!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

On Guard.
​

 

SNORLAX!!!!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I CHOOSE YOU!!!!
HEADBUTT ATTACK, NOW!!

 

It doesn't seem like a clear-cut majority wants to abolish the infraction system. What do we make of this?

 

The Devil Inside:

Haha. Your Snorlax won't wake up!

 

dude, 1 vote more is not clear cut.

you admit that the 2000 us presidential elections were clear cut, then?

 

he is waving!

 

"It doesn't seem like a clear-cut majority...."

 

oops.
reading..comprehension......failing....must......drink.....more....ginseng tea.....
uggggghhhh.....
*falls over*

 

Well, it doesn't sound to me like a convincing triumph?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

But a triumph nonetheless?

(Just an observation - excruciating indecision caused me not to vote.)

 

Administrator's Notice:

This was close shave indeed!

15:14 is the final result of this poll.

SF Abolitionists won their opponents SF 'Retain with or without changes' in really tight game.

(Crowd at the stadium sings: Walk on through the wind,
Walk on through the rain,
Tho' your dreams be tossed and blown.
Walk on, walk on with hope in your heart
And you'll never walk alone,
You'll never, ever walk alone...)


I would love that more members were involved in voting.
Anyway, I shall abide the results and abolish the infraction system.

Cheers!