Cognitive displacement reality

123

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Your post does not make much sense. The syntax is okay, but the semanitics leave something to be desired.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why C*D+X? Why not C/D-X or C+D+X or simply X !=Y?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

{b]Roman:[/b] I think Riple is teasing us. He cannot be serious.

 

if your cognitive powers are displaced, then it could all be jibberish.
-MT

 

What's a "cyclic attempted clone in symbiosis"? :bugeye:

 

It doesn't matter how good fifteen year old Scotch tastes, you should only drink so much of it.

 

I looked in the dictionary. There is no entry for 'cyclic attempted clone in symbiosis'. I know what each of the individual words mean but, taken as a whole, the words appear to be randomly thrown together.

For my benefit, and for the benefit of idiots like me, please clarify what is meant by 'cyclic attempted clone in symbiosis'. Thanks.

 

Very easily. The greatest mark of intelligence is the ability to express ideas in a simple, direct fashion. You are either unable, or unwilling to do this: the first speaks ill of your intellect, the latter casts doubt upon your manners.

 

Ripleofdeath:

"C * D + X = Y"

A clarification of your symbols are needed.

C and D = What?

C and D = Chocolate and drugs?

C and D = Speed of light and dimension?

C and D = Cognitive-state and dissonance?

Cognitive-state * dissonance + expectation = expected future?

"Or does a cyclic attempted clone in symbiosis get processed to attempt the forcasted factor defined "

Basically, are you asking here whether or not we produce a mental image of a cloned self in a different situation?

Also, I must agree with people here. You seem to be purposefully obscuring your theories. You furthermore seem to have made this a joke, considering your polling options.

 

I second redarmy. Riple, you might look into a dictionary or at the very least a grammar text. It might help the rest of us understand your "ginius," as you so put it.

 

Why are you bothering? The man can't even summarize his hypothesis*, let alone write a properly constructed sentence.

* It's not a theory unless it has been well-substantiated and repeatedly confirmed by observation and experimentation.

 

I can't speak for anyone else. But I'm bothering because I know he's taking the piss and want to catch him out at it.

 

Listen sleaze ball. Your inability to spell; to construct sentences with proper syntax; and above all, your singular inability to present a simple idea in a straightforward fashion, are unassailable proofs of your own inadequacies in the English language.

Do not have the unmitigated temerity to assuage your incompetence in the sphere of communication with a trite, schoolboy level claim that almost no one was smart enough to understand your simple thesis.

As noted previously your failure to express yourself cogently was due to either gross lack of ability, or even grosser lack of manners. I wish to withdraw that assertion and note that it is clearly a combination of the two.

Despite this lack of education and total lack of social skills, I imagine you may have access to a ruler, graded in inches or centimetres. Would you be good enough to find this, then report back to us upon how far up your ass your head is buried.

 

Very erudite and succinct. I quite enjoyed that. Especially the bit about the ruler. Truly a graphic image tour de force.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Stop holding a mirror up to your own actions.

This is a discussion forum for science. It behoves those of us with an education and interest in science to express ourselves with maximum clarity. In a display of self indulgent mental masturbation you have chosen, instead, to obscure, obfuscate and confuse. Setting aside the laughable implications of your theory (i.e. whimisical speculation) your failure to adhere to any of the conventions of science when presenting a concept, brand you as a scientific retard and self satisfied peon.

Am I hurt, or bruised, as you suggest? No. But I am enraged at your indifference to etiquette, good manners, and the principals of effective communication. Fortunately the ignore function relieves me of having to endure any more of your mental drivel.

Good day to you sir.

 

TERMANOLOGY - is not a word
formulational - is not a word
interactiveness - is not a word
Or does a cyclic attempted clone in symbiosis get processed to attempt the forcasted factor defined ? - is not a sentence

 

Even his name contains misspelling.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Unless it is meant to be R.I.P. Leo. F... death.

 

I can still remember the day when pretentious intellectuals could spell.