The Big Bang Never Happened - Make way for Plasma

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Cris, Jan 1, 2006.

  1. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    The author of this thread displays a potential to improve. All to the contrary are beyond improvement.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    The so called cosmic background radiation is false - there IS proof of this.
    The universe IS expanding BUT it did not start from a singularity.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. c7ityi_ Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,924
    teehee. space can't expand because it doensn't consist of anything. besides, there's no real proof that the universe expands.

    lol, what's the point with the theory then? when the theory was new, they said it explained the origin. some still do.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    space is infinite: The universe is expanding in space.
     
  8. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    In space or into space?
     
  9. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    Do you change <i>into</i> a new suit and admit to metamorphosis?
     
  10. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    Space itself is expanding. Matter on the large scale is moving with the expanding space. And the BB is alive and well. I can also show you hundreds of papers disputing relativity.
     
  11. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    Space is devouring the greater VOID

    The Big Bang is False - Just because the Universe was smaller in the past does NOT automatically mean it was infinitely smaller. There are holes in the big bang theory and not just black ones[Humour HA HA].
     
  12. TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    Well, the evidence is not supporting BB. And I'm sure someday we will have something more accurate then relativity...
     
  13. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    I am working on it's replacement as we speak, I've got it all down to a little pink fluffy ball but then the maths seems to give way. Any Ideas?
     
  14. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    The big bang is alleged to have occured on a Tuesday morning at 0315 15,755,327 years and 58 days ago. This is wrong! even accounting for the change to the Julian calendar it was a Friday.
     
  15. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    Then we should change our modern calender because the week should start on a monday, not a friday. Therefore. it should be monday or tuesday today, depending on how Megabrain was counting.

    Bloody hell...still the beginning of the week and i was already in the weekend mood.
     
  16. Godless Objectivist Mind Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,197
    He,he,he good for a laugh, however it apparently appears it "BB" just never took place.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    BB is BS.





    Sorry, I had to say it...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. Megabrain Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    103
    I find it rather absurd that the start of the universe should be reffered to as a 'big bang', apparently it was less than a plank length in diameter, so it should be 'little' and as for 'bang' that is generally refered to as a noise, but no-one can hear you scream in space therefore "silence" springs to mind. I therefore contend that big bang should be replaced by something more accurate such as "Small silent expansion" At the risk of being thrown out of the forum I might suggest that "small silent fart" would be far more descriptive. Since the scientists are so way out in their naming, might their theories also be off track?
     
  19. Godless Objectivist Mind Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,197
    Yup! no wonder it smells like shit around here!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    No, that was you!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Don't put the blame on BB!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. erich_knight Erich J. Knight Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    108
    The standard model stands up. At least this simulation is trouble for Plasma Cosmology supporters:

    http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/10/16

    "On the case of the "missing" helium
    27 October 2006

    Astrophysicists may have solved the embarrassing problem of why there is so much less helium-3 in the universe than predicted by standard cosmology and star-evolution theories. Peter Eggleton of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the US and colleagues at Monash University in Australia have calculated that when aging low-mass stars swell to become "red giants", the large amount of helium-3 they have produced is pushed down into the stars’ hot interiors, where it is then burnt up. The result suggests that our understanding of the Big Bang is correct after all (Sciencexpress 1133065)."
     
  22. Godless Objectivist Mind Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,197
    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/bang.htm

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    The Big Bang never happened the same way as HIV never was proved to exist.
     

Share This Page