Africans in charge?

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yep, So what do you think? Do You agree with Larry Elder's opinion of the African American people?

Whatever you want to say I am, I am right?

If it is for the better I will make the change.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A relevant read....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_of_poverty

There are also psychological factors. Abuse tends to spread throughout generations. Blacks were enslaved and abused by whites hundreds of years ago. You think that that never affected them?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The Blacks that live in America, have the highest standard of living then any other blacks anywhere else in the world.

 

James R, I find you to be very odd in the fact that a black man named Larry Elder who write this opinion:

And you responded to Larry's opinion with this comment:

 

this new gimmick is funnier, d'ster.

 

Larry Elder is a douche.

 

Oh, well they use it on Home and Away which is a fairly "family" show, so blame its producers for corrupting me

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Anyway, my point was....if you haven't spent much time around black people what makes you such an expert on their desires and needs?

 

The dictionary definition of racism alone should show you that race is perhaps the most inefficient way to judge the qualification of leaders.

But seriously, this is something people truly and seriously believe in. You and I don't have to understand it, it's just who they are at the core.

 

Arabs are black. I don't know what you think of Bin Laden, but he looks black, not white. Like I said before, there are different races of black, and different tribes. Many black tribes would would say the same thing about other tribes. Most people in Africa spoke completely different languages and had completely seperate cultures.

The cannibal tribes existed, and there were Jewish and Muslim tribes as well. There are Christian tribes too. In general whoever visited Africa during this time would have been confused by the different languages and weird cultures that even other tribes who looked alike were likely to be confused about.

The Christian tribes by the way, existed before there was a such thing as Islam. The Arab genepool likely came about, around the time of Egypt, during the gene mixing periods, as before this period in Egypt there seemed to be no such thing as an Arab in historical records.

So this goes to show, there are different tribes and races among people who look the same or similar.

 

a sad state of affairs, if you ask me.

 

Arabs are not black. Arabs are caucasoids.

 

If white people are so civilized, why has no white civilization lasted as long as Egypt? Or China?

When it comes to government, you must admit, the tribes were more advanced and we are playing catch up. We are just now using diplomacy, tribes had this all along. We only recently discovered democracy while the tribes had it all along. We only recently discovered socialism, while the tribes had these systems all along.

The tribes did have a form of money, despite your complete ignorance. The tribes did/do have houses, they did have doctors (witch doctors), most musical instruments were invented in Africa, language was invented in Africa, and despite your ignorance the African languages are more complex than English.

Africans actually had a very stable tribal system, the only problem was there were so many tribes that they couldnt build a civilization for the simple reason that the civilization they had (Egypt), fell, and when civilizations fall these things happen. When Rome fell, white people had the dark ages, the black plague, and kings and queens all over the place. White people were at war with white people for hundreds and hundreds of years over money, simply because they never invented a proper system of distribution of resources.

You can talk bad about the tribes, but the tribes werent at war, so they did not need weapons. The tribes were peacefully co-existing. Arabs who you claim visited them, were weirded out, but Arabs were just as weirded out by whites who they also considered uncivilized. Let's not forget the Chinese considered whites to be barbarians as well. Anyone who was from a different tribe during this time would be considered uncivilized and it had little to do with race.

Arabs, as a gene pool, is much like hispanics today. They formed due to race mixing. Race is not the same as tribe. To group all Arabs together as if they all got along is silly. To group all Africans together as if they all got along is silly. Arabs are Africans, just a different tribe from say, the cannibal tribe, or the Christian tribe. The moors, if you know anything about history, were an African tribe that dominated Europe, and they werent Arab.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors
http://ri.essortment.com/whoweremoorsi_ogk.htm

Italy, Spain, Portugal, these were some of the countries conquered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa#Early_civilizations_and_trade

If you want to learn, take a sociology class.

 

hahaha ok, how exactly do you define this?

How am I supposed to take this seriously?

 

Here is what I think, I think any great person who is black, this guy is going to say was actually caucasoid. In the future, Bill Cosby and Michael Jackson will have been changed to white, in the future Martin Luther King will have been changed to white, and the only blacks will be the gangbangers and prisoners. Am I correct? Oprah will be made into white, along with the Egyptians, and anyone else great.

This is just, remaking history. Which is what is to be expected because almost all of the history books were written in Europe, so you don't get the truth, you get the European perspective only. History is actually just a bunch of stories, it's like the bible, and it's very easy to change the images around so black becomes white or white becomes black etc.

I'm just wondering, how the last centuries history will be reported. And I'm wondering why certain people have such a fetish for erasing blacks out of history all together, as if blacks did not exist at all and just sorta appeared in ghettos, or appeared with spears in the jungles of Africa, to me that is completely ridiculous. It's also ridiculous to believe that considering where they are located, and the types of features on Egyptians, that the Egyptians could be white, and that Arabs are somehow white when they win, but black when they lose.

Seriously, what exactly does white mean? Is it the new code word for winner? Are you going to say Asians are white too?

 

Thats because it's fucking washington DC! It's the one place you'd expect a lot of crime going on. Crime of all types, considering you have so many powerful people in one place. I don't think it has anything to do with race, you act as if the mafia cannot commit crimes, you act as if scientists cannot commit crimes, even Larry Elders can commit crime, you could commit a crime.

 

That's what I've always read. The US census even classifies them as such. Of course, you've assumed I mean "white" when I say "caucasoid", which makes you the ignorant one. Pakistanis are caucasoids even though in some cases their skin is darker than "black" people's....although the US census now apparently includes Arabs as white.

One thing is certain though, there is no way that Arabs are negroids.

Timetraveler, are you black?

 

This is a really stupid thread. Anyway here's what I think..Black people suck and white people suck. Asians do a better job, for God sakes they are better looking. Outsource this thread. Period!

 

About the same solution as for other ethnic groups:

Creating the African Superman

:m: