Unlike buddha1, controversial existabrent is using the "100%", title. Hey, i'm not so bad a person, don't slap me or anything. Firstly I have psychological and scientific evidence and ..what's the word?......fine: reasons, reasons for reasons, for believing this to be true. Reasons upon reasons upon reasons, infact. I have started many threads in this regard, one of the first on the site was created that all women hate all men. Unless a mod deleted it Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The un-argueable logic behind all of this is fasicinating: buddha1 was a guy, i'm a guy.... just friggs me out. If you would like the evidence, allow me to post it later. If you go to esanga buddhist community forum, I created a thread there too with the exact same title. I don't like repeating myself but sometimes, I do. Basically... I think a ground may be voices and titles of "masculainity and, "feminity" whatever the hell the spellings whatever. That women simply desire the female more. But, i'm not arguing about that. I'm arguing that women are more lesbian. existabrent
I wouldn't disagree... because on a personal scale, there have been numerous occasions where I am led to believe such a thing. It would be interesting to see stats on this.
Weren't you the one who started the "Women enjoy cutting guy's dicks off" thread, or whatever the name was? Anyway, you're a wack. But I'll say this, women enjoy hanging out with other women a lot more then men, mainly because they can feel secure. As for sexual attraction, I wouldn't say they are predominantly lesbian, but I wouldn't argue if you said they were predominantly bisexual.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! From what I've seen, women have no qualms about being intimate with other women. It's not that big of a deal to them, as it is with men.
Most women I know are not sexually attracted to other women. Thus, the claim in the thread title is proved false.
This thread is obviously just poking fun at Buddah1... and you're all eating it up ? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
So what if girls hug each other more? It's not the same as guys hugging each other (sans backslapping)
Typical...guy can't get girlfriend therefore all women must be lesbian...convenient, highly inaccurrate. If all women were predominatently lesbian then vast majority of women would be in lesbian relationships as oppose to to heterosexual ones and they are not. Mind you, a few more guys like you Brent and who knows, the pendululm may indeed start swinging in favour of your claims!
young women enjoy themselves more than men in general. The problem with men is the idea of masculinity, for some reason men always take a lot of relatively assinine stuff from other men, and will readily dish it out to women. Men's socio-psychological problem started a long time ago when they gave other men power, this automatically reduced their self esteem and potential, only for these creatures to make up for it with perhaps the greatest irrational ideology of all time "manliness". However its through men not women that great civilizations are built, thats good enough for me. I agree a lot of women may be lesbians just from some of my own real life encounters. I really don't care if they sleep with Pandas much less other women, at the very least its food for the eyes. The theory men are like dogs and women are like cats could't be more wrong, I have owned both. Men think independently while women need a social structure ever so often, just think, when was the last time you called your parents guys? Most men like to be left alone until they are ready, women on the other hand like to create activities and routines. My guess is that the need for support is where the lesbianism in women comes from.
in our society, we celebrate men who can stand on their own two feet. we envy men who have a mysterious confidence and who seem to not need anyone to make it. we perceive this as strenght. in women, we celebrate those who appear weak and fragile. they seem to be helpless, but at the same time independent. this brings the same air of mysteriousness. it seems like she needs help so much, and yet she is completely self sufficient. when has a women ever been attracted to a man who appeared to be helpless or fragile? when has a man ever been attracted to a woman who didn't need him? men want to attract the opposite sex. in order to do this; to leverage the power of cupids magical arrow, they must stand on there on to feet. where woman is fragile, man must be strong. he must be able to build his own house. women enjoy life more. they are more social. this is because man is focused on being the provider. he must tread his path to stability and strength in solitude or be out classed by other men who will still the mate that he seeks. if he asked for help, he appears weak and needy. men fear this above all things. they want to be in control because this attracts women. watch a group of men and women together and you will see the men fighting for the spotlight. in this dynamic, it's easy to see why lesbianism is easier than being gay is for guys. women are more likely to be close and intimate friends. they know how to give each other intense pleasure probably beyond that of what most men can provide. they don't feel weakend and demoralized by the experience. on the other hand, men are afraid of losing their masculinity and strength through such an experience with the same sex. women have to give themselves all throughout life. man wants to take. our manhood can never be taken from us. this is the burden of man.
Quite frequently actually, women like to nurture and quite often are attracted to males they can nurture and be 'caretaker' for. Men simialrly are attracted to strong independant women, self sufficient. Not all, as we have different needs and drives, there is thus no generalisation to be made. Brents statement is bollocks, he knows it, anyone therefore supporting it is ........................ :m:
I am not agreeing with Brent that women are 100% lesbian. Don't be fooled by the strong, independent, and self sufficient women. They still want a "man". They won't be attracted to a man who is weak and needy. Just because she nurturing and caring for him doesn't mean the man is fragile in the since I'm talking about. Any man who can't take care of himself and be independent has it comin'. Not all men are one way and not all women are another way. All I'm saying is that there are certain characteristics in men and women that are considered very attractive and others that are considered unattractive. Also, lesbianism is more acceptable to women than gayness is to men.
1. 2. 3. I'm going to show how each statement is false. 1.Claiming that I know it is, is a statement made from confusion.... I don't really know it is. Infact, there are tons of reasons. At the "philosophyforums.com" site, there is a thread called "the death of masculinity", this leads me to reason, that such a title is: ...let's just say, "containing of stats". This is just the thread for my theory on the issue. As evidenced.. 2. Well. A highly professional arguement, James. Infact... so much so, that it leads me to not argue. Well, i guess we are allowed our differences? I will go on to believe un-til I hear otherwise. As far as your statement goes, We obviously must define lesbian. And, when we do, what do we see? Perhaps that the thread title is mis-leading. 3. Would you ban a person who creates such threads as you see in the world events, or, psuedo-science, or... politics threads? I thought so!
With due respect, this is a myth created by the heterosexual society that men like to be independant and they don't bond. In fact amongst mammals if there is a herding instinct it is amongst the males. It is extremely strong amongst men too. Men have been broken from other men for centuries in order to fit them into the marriage institution --- and now into heterosexuality --- but that is not his real nature. And it is the root of his oppression.
This thread is about female homosexuality. The ones with boobs and a pussy. Kindly do not hijack it into one of your famed "discussions" about male homosexuality.
a. I never once talked about homosexuality. I don't support homosexuality. That is a false accusation. b. I made a comment about men because someone compared men to women and tried to make a point. I think its completely valid and required to talk about men here. c. I can't be bothered about your mental block to talk about men's issues. If you'd rather only talk about women's issues, you can ignore my posts.
Buddha1, i've always liked you post about men all you want. "The death of masculinity" is still funny (from philosophyforums.com) It's a funny joke as tor is saying. Not serious to me.
