actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

you say you did physics? at what level?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

apparently he has given demonstrations and has evidence via his physics' experience calculations. show us your crit-sources. put ya money where yer mouuurrrf is!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I wasn't laughing at myself (in this instance), "Cool Skill". You know that.

I was laughing at you.

At those "points" you continually tell yourself you're making.
At your mulish stupidity, at your undeserved self-aggrandisement, at your nick, at your constant references to yourself in the third person, at your... oh never mind.

Go away. Put me on your ignore list, you piece of distended pygmy rectum. You're not fun now. You're simply disgusting. Game over.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Nice set of flames, troll.
You have done nothing in this discussion, but cry and flame.
Continue laughing at yourself, crying, flaming, or whatever it is you do best.
You obviously have no point other than to heckle and troll.

 

I mentioned University, and you study for degrees at University, duendy.

 

Local or National? Jesus, your attention span is tiny.

All theoretical, without any physical evidence to back up his theoretical physics, sadly.

And his structural engineering colleagues do not agree with his conclusions. He is outnumbered, and not agreed upon by his peers. He is swimming against the tide of opinion. This is statistics in action, duendy, no matter what the prevailing odds, the pressure, or the facts of the matter, you'll often get an exception. You've found one, well done. It's the majority view that counts, however.

Why don't you think that 9/11 was the way it was, duendy? Al Qaeda tried previously to blow up the WTC using vans full of explosives in the basement car park. If you are aware of the case of Samual Byck, you'll know a nearly successful attempt to hijack a plane to be flown into the White House took place back in 1974 (see the film 'The Assasination of Richard Nixon' for the dramatised account). So why can't you accept that Al Qaeda tried the same thing a quarter of a century later? How come it took a terrorist organisation so long to try it, is my only question!

 

Oh yes you did;

Go away, noob.

 

look, its you who are questioning a professor of physics. and you mentioned ytou had DONE physics. so i of course ask at what level. why are you being evasive about this?

 

Because of lots and lots of tings phlo.
Inconsistencies in the offical storie(S); the quick disappearance of evidence (i will create a better list later, regarding your question); the barring of a public inquiry by the powers that be; the OCCULT symbolism all ofer '9/11'; the SPECTACLEof it--perfect for propaganda; that i smell a RAT; tht i am verysavvy how in past 'enimies' are created for particular strateegic purposes for te military inductrial complex to feed its war industry machine; that is see who it BENEFITS and it aint US, its the powers that be who lied about going to war s a RESULT of 9/11 and have invested interests in all of what is going on in Midddle East.

You are very naive Phlo, even toug you tink yourself sophistiacted. you must imagine tat the oppressors give two shits for te lives of 3.000 people to further teir cause?? when they can sen thousands of their own soldiers in the horrors of wars, and also not warn them about depleted uranium---that it is a killer just to breathe in---but of course you dont even believe that do you...?!
Ypu fail to see that your 'trustoworthy' leaders thinknothing of killing and maiming thousands and tousands of people, many civilians after having brought them toteir knees in te many years of te 'sanctions' where over one million children and babies died. all that forgotten hey? and you oooo a rrrrrr about how teses ever so niiice people wouldn't couln't DREAM of pulling off staged terrorism...?

But as i say. regardless of that, i feel i am investigating still. maybe your dfault is 'no they didn't' and mine is 'yes they did'---but where we differ is that you will not want to investigate bout it, asyou dont see point and dont think they did it anyhow. whilst i am wanting to PROVE it and kick them out. like surely one would want to do with any tyrant...? and oppressor. dont you want them out out out?
they are poisoning Nature!!! This shit is UNpecedented and urgently serious.

 

duendy, have you bothered to get in touch with the Zacarias Moussaoui defence team to advise them of your superior insight?

--- RH.

 

i am in communications right now....see the news tonight!

 

please see ---Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics www.public-action.com/911/mcmichael.html

 

No I didn't. Quote me if I did. Otherwise, stop clouding peopl's statements.

WTF. Go away? I presented a clear explaination of my interpretation, and you come back with moronic remarks, and continue to avoid the issue while arguing about something that is not the issue at all. I suggest you go away.

 

No, I mentioned that a physicist's claims over the demolition of a building were not agreed upon by a bunch structural engineers who were more qualified in the field. Are you being dense or something? We don't study concrete in physics. We don't study cantilever arches, RSJ's, floating floors, or any of the things that structural engineers do, so leaping to conclusions about ways a building may have collapsed, when it's not his forte, and he has no evidence, is not scientific, so his credentials are rather inapplicable.

 

Yet, they haven't been bothered. I bet they get a lot of crank callers duendy!

Did they? What evidence did they get rid off? They magicked away the Aluminium Oxide, did they? What with, a mind ray?

You read wrong, a few other loons agree with him, but his views have been disavowed by the Dept of Structural Engineering from his own University. If you do a web search on his name, you'll find his paper, and various discussions of it, and he is pretty much out on his own. Do you own research if YOU are making the claim, woowoo.

There aren't any. There are spurious eyewitness reports, giving misleading info, but those aren't 'official', justr because some crackpot publication featured them!

How do you know there was evidence if it disappeared?

Loon.

No more spectacular than it would have been if Al Quaeda had succeeded in their attempt in 1993.

Living in Manchester, so what?

I think you are convolving a few issues there. One at a time, please/

Nope, I'm not naive enough to believe something without evidence, as you are.

Anyway, please feel free to add some more weight to the claim about the Thermite reaction countering my rebuttal of it.

 

I quoted you already! Jesus, are you that dim that you can't go back through your posts and see where the bit I quoted you as saying came from? YOU mentioned Sheen's (in context) reputation.

You can't even remember what you wrote.

 

hah! so a Professor of physics' claims are not scientific now....? oh myyy gawwwwd. whacha gonna cum out wid next, haha
and who , pray, are these structural engineers you keep goin on about. i believe they must be a figment of your imagination. why? well i deduce this cause you NEVER provide any sources to back up what yo say. so full of yourself, you pronounce...!

 

The crucial issue is instability, stresses caused by the inability to cope with inherent low frequency vibration.

With tall structures a good deal of design work goes into this and a large hole in the side of building does then tend to have an effect.

--- RH.

 

look at that new link i gave. what you think huh?.....ahhhhhhhhh

 

*Sarcasm* "Really?" *end sarcasm*

Now, have you anything of any relavance to say, or just more BS?