Fraggle Rocker
Moderator

And what do you know about Fraggles, sir?

Thanks for the reply. Keep up the good work. Many years back I spend a couple of years trying to make a living as a freelance writer and was able to make some money in writing science articles, but in the end went back to the corporate world. I'm looking at trying to make a second run at it maybe through or as retirement. :)

So you said: # Quaternary: A writer like me dumbed it down to one page in language accessible by fairly well educated laymen and posted it on Wikipedia.

So are you a Science Writer? I'm looking at getting back into it myself, but have not written/published anything in a good while....

Well, keep studying and learning. You will soon learn that "alot" is spelled totally right!
I jest. You do seem quite knowledgeable. Thank you for your input into the frivolous yet strangely worthwhile discussion about the mess that is formally known as the English language. And how we can fix/mutilate it further!

You sure seem to know alot about words.

Please accept my apology for my rudeness:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2452924&postcount=181

Please retract or correct your statement regarding Indonesia:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=98243&page=10

friggin first of all;
next time post it on my wall..
now i'll proceed to reading what you wrote.

Scifes:

Existence of a soul has not been disproved, but since it would contradict more than one canonical scientific theory, it qualifies as an "extraordinary assertion." Under the Rule of Laplace we are not obliged to treat extraordinary assertions with respect if they are not accompanied by extraordinary evidence. Otherwise the finite resources of science would be dissipated in constant, pointless battles against crackpottery and supernaturalism. There is no extraordinary evidence for the existence of souls or any other supernatural phenomena. In fact there is no ordinary evidence. Therefore, even in an academy of tertiary and quaternary research like SciForums, we are free to treat these arguments with the disrespect they deserve. However, we are not required to, so I have given you the courtesy of this response. -- F.R.