George1
Registered Senior Member

I am back, and armed with a whole new level of technical and scientific understanding.

For the last time - showing me numbers without the proof behind the numbers means NOTHING.

Just like I could modify the Star Trek wiki with "proof" that the Ent-E's phasers output in the multi petaton range if I wanted to... it's a WIKI. It's PUBLIC.

IT IS NOT PROOF.

Numbers, mathmatics, THAT is proof.

Uh, no. Star Trek is pretty much written under the direction of Paramount Pictures... unless you mean the books, which are not even being used in this debate.

So put that in your "holier than thou" pipe and smoke it...

Mate, you haven't provided proof. You have shown numbers with no backing, and "information" taken from books written by fans that are no more able to show evidence to support their claims than you are.

You lost when you resorted to insults, strawman attacks on my person, and fan-based works to support your cause. It's over.

good post man

I didn't say anything about 'magic'. Star Wars has never really discussed any science in detail. Never. At least in Star Trek they deal with ACTUAL theories. And actual science: quantum mechanics, temporal mechanics, altenate energy souces. The point is, ST has science that in recent years has become reality!! Because it's PLAUSIBLE. SW never talks about any of the science in detail, it was all about ONE war. Jedi/Sith. Sw does not have any replayability (as the gaming term goes). It doesn't vary it's content. Which is why it's called star WARS. ;) All the answers are handed to you. Hell, somebody in a coma could watch SW, because it doesn't require you to think!!

well just because a lot of theoretics are involved, doesn't mean it's not real science ;)