Asguard
Kiss my dark side

Mini Statistics

Join Date: 02-23-02

Avatar

More 15 Friends

1 Groups

The Browncoats

Join Groups 0 Permission Groups

You are not a member of any groups

Recent Visitors

The last 9 visitor(s) to this page were:

This page has had 9,819 visits

Tab Content: Asguard's Activity; Visitor Messages; About Me; Friends

Tab Content: All; Asguard; Friends; Photos

Older Activity
05-20-13, 05:11 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

This tangle of misinterpretation and diversion is why it's so hard to make progress. Tach, one-way light speed isotropy is what is relevant to...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-20-13, 02:18 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Same link, previous section: Note that while these experiments clearly use a one-way light path and find isotropy, they are inherently unable to...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-19-13, 12:50 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

This obstructionist behavior is effectively trolling, and is not acceptable. Tach, you are not a teacher. If you see an error, point it out...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-19-13, 12:38 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

As I'm sure you're aware, the only possible experimental proof is for two-way speed, not one-way.

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-19-13, 10:08 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Thread reopened. I concede that relativity of simultaneity is not measurable unless we first assume without proof that the speed of light is frame...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-18-13, 08:57 PM

Pete replied to a thread Relativistic parallel rods in Physics & Math

I find it puzzling that Tach acknowledges that two rods can pass each other as shown, but can't seem to accept that they could collide. Unless he's...

see more

313 replies | 7240 view(s)
05-18-13, 10:52 AM

Pete replied to a thread Relativistic parallel rods in Physics & Math

We were, but Tach now agrees that the animations at the start of this thread are valid.

see more

313 replies | 7240 view(s)
05-17-13, 02:53 AM

Pete posted a visitor message on eram's profile

You might like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TMIUAzF2q4

see more
05-16-13, 11:21 PM

Pete replied to a thread The Human Piledriver in Intelligence & Machines

Who is we? We (the people of the Earth) can, and obviously do. It could be done anywhere, but in most developed places hiring mechanical equipment...

see more

1 replies | 1454 view(s)
05-16-13, 07:49 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

This thread will be closed for couple of days, because the discussion is becoming obstructed and the conversation is becoming unruly. Everyone take a...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-16-13, 09:05 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Hi ash, eram said you "sounded" rude, not that you were being rude. Please don't take offence. Try to stay focused on the actual points of the...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-16-13, 09:01 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Just popping in to say that I'm still thinking over Tach's latest position. I think it's a valid objection, but I'm not sure that he's considered...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-16-13, 08:21 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is it possible to induce an electrical current in water? in Physics & Math

Hi oseosis, I know from experience that we all have a great intrinsic capacity for self-delusion. It seems to be built in to our genes. I guess being...

see more

24 replies | 361 view(s)
05-16-13, 07:34 AM

Pete replied to a thread Can anyone explain the physics of how Photovoltaic Solar Panels work? in Physics & Math

8-year old thread. MacM died three years ago (obituary). It gave me a funny feeling when I moused-over his name, and the pop-up said "MacM is...

see more

11 replies | 473 view(s)
05-16-13, 07:19 AM

Pete replied to a thread Being good at maths makes you a good programmer? in Physics & Math

I'm not so sure. There is wonderful artistry in pure mathematics, and often many ways of approaching the same problem, but it occurs at a deeper...

see more

13 replies | 186 view(s)
05-14-13, 08:27 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

So now you don't know relativity of simultaneity is real? It's interesting that you've change your mind. You might want to revisit your earlier...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-14-13, 08:00 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Fundamentally it all comes down to RoS relying on choice of synchronization, as I said. The test I propose explicitly relies on the assumption of...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-14-13, 07:17 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Excellent, now we're getting somewhere! It is certainly true that my setup explicitly relies on a uniform one-way speed of light, which is part of...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-14-13, 06:03 PM

Pete replied to a thread Rambling math notes from someone with an agenda in Physics & Math

Awesome. Carry on!

see more

8 replies | 275 view(s)
05-14-13, 06:40 AM

Pete replied to a thread Rambling math notes from someone with an agenda in Physics & Math

So what's the agenda? I don't see anything controversial in the parts I could follow, linking compound interest to natural growth and the...

see more

8 replies | 275 view(s)
05-14-13, 05:58 AM

Pete replied to a thread Basic Special Relativity Question in Physics & Math

Back to the topic. Your argument seems self-contradictory. You say that the bending of the rod predicted by the Lorentz transform is not...

see more

814 replies | 13832 view(s)
05-14-13, 05:37 AM

Pete replied to a thread Relativistic parallel rods in Physics & Math

Hi mikelizzi, this thread is about whether the rods in box-diagonals show that parallelism in general is frame-independent. The original rod...

see more

313 replies | 7240 view(s)
05-14-13, 05:28 AM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

90 posts is way too long for a sidetrack. I'm moving this to its own thread.

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-14-13, 05:17 AM

Pete replied to a thread Basic Special Relativity Question in Physics & Math

90 posts of sidetrack have been moved to a separate thread: Is relativity of simultaneity measurable?

see more

814 replies | 13832 view(s)
05-13-13, 11:50 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Right.

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-13-13, 10:52 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

No, he's got an offline life like the rest of us, which means he doesn't respond to every post within minutes. Tach, the question was whether you...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-13-13, 10:31 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

You just agreed that the clocks in one frame record the same time for events A and B, while the clocks in the other frame record different times for...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)
05-13-13, 10:21 PM

Pete replied to a thread Is relativity of simultaneity measurable? in Physics & Math

Excellent. We agree that two events (A and B) are measured to happen simultaneously in one frame, and measured to happen non-simultaneously in...

see more

315 replies | 3736 view(s)

More Activity

21 Visitor Messages

kira - 08-27-11 05:52 AM View Conversation

Thank you for your comment on my thread:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=109517

I won't be back to that thread for now, but your input is appreciated. :)
hypewaders - 09-01-10 06:06 AM View Conversation

Welcome back, mate.
Pine_net - 07-09-10 03:40 PM View Conversation

Hello my friend. It's been a long time but I thought I would jump on here and see how you are doing. What have you been up to man?! Things are good here, It's good to see your still on here.

Have a great day my friend
Kernl Sandrs - 06-06-10 10:56 AM View Conversation

It's spelled "Asgard."
NMSquirrel - 05-17-10 10:27 PM View Conversation

star wars pic with a stargate name..hmmm..
~~Treval~~ - 02-17-10 08:09 AM View Conversation

Dear Sir,

I would like to say that someone has been offending to me on the forums:
http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2480489&postcount=2

As you can see this is an offending post and it is against the SciForum rules:

Q.
By agreeing to these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.

The owners of SciForums.com reserve the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason.

Sincerely,
Treval
~~fellowtraveler~~ - 12-14-09 07:36 PM View Conversation

I like you, the man you are Asguard. no response required, ...fellowtraveler
Challenger78 - 08-23-09 09:23 AM View Conversation

Really? I'll take your word for it.
I'm just surprised that now that Labor is in power, no one has voiced anti US sentiments. I mean, they could have had a ball in 2007
Challenger78 - 08-22-09 03:56 AM View Conversation

Asguard. Why hate latham ?
madanthonywayne - 07-29-09 03:06 AM View Conversation

Good to see you. How's it going down under?