Not that I'm aware of... but if he comes and posts crap in your threads you can always complain to the mods, and usually they'll erase his posts if not ban him altogether. He's on a pretty thin leash as is, so don't worry about it too much.
Anyhow, don't expect anything much coherent, accurate or relevant from him when it comes to maths and physics. If you ask him to elaborate on some of his gibberish, he'll just throw even more gibberish at you and then whine, flame and complain when you call him out on it. I feel really bad for this guy, he could have done a proper undergrad degree in the time he's wasted posting psychobabble here, but he doesn't seem interested in changing his ways, and the mods will probably run out of patience with him pretty soon at this rate.
In reality I haven't seen anything from him that would indicate even a first-year high school math ability, let alone undergrad or graduate, yet he constantly tries to discuss advanced graduate theoretical physics and to copy and paste equations from Wikipedia as part of the effort. Dunno what it's all about, but my guess is he's trying to impress someone by making them think he's a scientist who chats with other scientists on a regular basis. I think his own ignorance blinds him from realizing how stupid he looks to those who actually have some understanding of the subjects he wants to discuss.
Howdy! Well as Mister has now admitted (and most regulars in physics already knew based on post style and content), he used to go by the name Reiku before he was perma-banned for constant trolling and spamming nonsensical gibberish. He's come here under more than a dozen different names (by his own admission), and certain moderators have even identified him using the same IP address for many if not all of them. I've been a member here for about 3 years. Since the time I first showed up (and before then), he's been trying to sell himself as having a proper university-level education in maths and physics, incoherently copying and pasting internet sources and equations without having any clue what they mean. It seems he's long been trying to do this in a futile attempt to gain credibility here, so that he can discuss a whole load of woo woo under the guise of what he mistakenly views as legitimate science.
I know very little about mathematics, but I seem to remember pi being used for some kind of probability calculation.
Hey Fudge. You are half right and half wrong I think. A perfect circle is impossible to draw physically. Theoretically,a circle is is not a problem. I would have said so on your thread, but they shut it down. A tangent touches a circle at a point, and that is the only part of a circle that can be said to be straight. Infinite number of points in a line. A bit of string and a pencil is going to get nowhere near. Seemed to me like a fair question, unless you have been posting something batty elsewhere. Ask the mod why he/she shut it down?
