camilus
09-09-07, 07:22 PM
\int\frac{dx}{1+e^x}
can anyone find the answer. I'm almost fighting the people at physicsforums.com over this problem!
can anyone find the answer. I'm almost fighting the people at physicsforums.com over this problem!
|
|
View Full Version : integrals of e^x camilus 09-09-07, 07:22 PM \int\frac{dx}{1+e^x} can anyone find the answer. I'm almost fighting the people at physicsforums.com over this problem! D H 09-09-07, 08:27 PM \int\frac{dx}{1+e^x} can anyone find the answer. I'm almost fighting the people at physicsforums.com over this problem! Stop fighting, then. They are right, you know. Hint #1: Double check your integral by differentiation. It should return the original function. Hint #2: Use the integrator (http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp). Don't rely on it too much because you won't learn anything that way. BenTheMan 09-10-07, 09:56 AM In[1]:= \!\(∫\(1\/\(1 + \[ExponentialE]\^x\)\) \[DifferentialD]x\) Out[1]= \!\(TraditionalForm\`x - log(1 + \[ExponentialE]\^x)\) This means \int\frac{1}{1+e^x}dx = x-\log(1-e^x) camilus 09-10-07, 02:29 PM I got something different. I got \int\frac{1}{1+e^x}dx = x-ln(e^x +1) + C = \ln[{e^x \over e^x +1}] + C http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t121/camilus23/etothexproblem.jpg camilus 09-10-07, 02:33 PM nevermind, I see I got the same answer as Mathematica, but you just retyped it wrong. You put a minus sign instead of a plus sign. BenTheMan 09-11-07, 10:14 AM Yeah sounds like something I'd do. Absane 09-11-07, 02:10 PM Yeah sounds like something I'd do. I got the same problem. I also confuse myself with the "fence post" problem all of the time. :( temur 09-11-07, 04:59 PM I always have to concentrate hard to get no error, because these things scare me. Absane 09-11-07, 10:53 PM I always have to concentrate hard to get no error, because these things scare me. Well the important thing is to know HOW to do math, not to actually do math ;) Blue_UK 09-12-07, 03:23 AM I think you'll find that's maths temur 09-12-07, 02:42 PM Well the important thing is to know HOW to do math, not to actually do math ;) May be. But details are the evil. I believe without actually doing math, for most of the people it is impossible both to learn how to do math and to express their ideas. Pete 09-13-07, 08:25 PM I think you'll find that's maths This sidetrack has been moved to a new thread in Linguistics: Maths vs Math. DH, you're the new "originator" of that thread, so you might want to edit the first post a little. Or not - it's OK as it stands. |