https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-64019324 I'm against this 'plan' to protect Nature. Why? Because the billionaires, statesmen and politicians making the planet a shit ball now, will later come up with a plan that makes it okay for only billionaires, statesmen and politicians to live in these protected regions. Mark my words, we're doomed! And we should all go down together. Doomed I tells ya.
Now if we can just form a mission statement eliminating war and poverty we'll have no more problems. If it weren't for those billionaires we'd be able to have more nice things.
It's too late, the billionaires, statesmen, politicians, monarchical systems and dictatorships have had plenty of time to get things right over the centuries, they look at each other as the 'competition' and the same old system just propagates on and on with wars and segregation by class and race. It's too late, we all go down together, living by a system that fucked the planet. They have reached the stage where they have run out of space. They fucked the planet, and this is their last grasp to keep above the herd by agreeing to keep the last unpolluted parts of the world to themselves. ( They haven't really, but my rant wouldn't make sense if they hadn't). Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You might do a little research into ranting to come up with a more developed system. To the one, the cacophony of the billionaire class, the potsherds they leave in their wake, the induced sosobra we feel and to the other, the entitlement of and for society, is a requiem for the current state of affairs as we see it on this trouble planet that neigh I say, we are so undeserving of...
A presiding power which essentially gave up and acknowledged back in 1978 that collectivism can only endure by being parasitical on capitalism. Would facetiously place more stock in an international conference of Plain People, who at least have the correct lifestyle for diminishing resource ravaging. Communist Marxist socialist social democrat websites feel enmity toward progressivism for a reason.[1] Decades of the latter being a dominant or overbearing thought orientation for implementing social justice agenda and largely mediating the propaganda.[2] IOW, morally pretentious [two-faced] capitalists who hijack and manipulate do-gooderism to serve their own interests / career elevations. COP 15 apparently has a similar resonance of quasi-domesticated, virtue posturing wolves volunteering to protect the farm livestock. (See? There was a reason for that perplexing detour in the middle, to clarify the aptness of the metaphor.) - - - footnotes - - - [1] ("Morning vitriol: It's not just for spitting venom at conservatives!") [2] Not that authentic southpaw-ism is any less deceptive and ambitious in its own way, but it's less popular; and one should always either genuflect to or tread lightly when it comes to the local ideological gods of an online community. Glory to the left! _
