↑ . No , these are my own thoughts . Black-holes decrease the volume of space , because they condense matter to the point that matter needs less space to exist . Hence this goes on for infinity . Until there is no space and nor matter , nor Energy . It is nothing . Nothing begets nothing , ( No-thing ) for infinity . Therefore the Universe should be based on something , the Physical three dimensional Universe , Something , which is for infinity existent . river
Anyway from post # 621 So black-holes can't exist . They don't change the volume of space . Black-holes don't decrease the volume of space . No , these are my own thoughts . Black-holes decrease the volume of space , because they condense matter to the point that matter needs less space to exist . Hence this goes on for infinity . Until there is no space and nor matter , nor Energy . It is nothing . Nothing begets nothing , ( No-thing ) for infinity . Therefore the Universe should be based on something , the Physical three dimensional Universe , Something , which is for infinity existent . river
To account for what the theory needs to be legit . Based on gravity . And is not the same space that normally 66 billion Suns would take to exist .
I mostly use the same words as everybody else. I could speak Dutch , but it's been a long time since I have Hollands gesproken Gravitational singularity Gravitational singularity - Wikipedia Might well be the backdoor entrance to another universe or in the case of toroidal universe the backdoor to the same Universe. A singularity does not need to be small. It just is very dense as in 60 billion suns collapsing into a single ball. When a critical threshold is reached the black hole collapse reverses into a rapid expansion and a new universe or galaxy emerges in a state of chaos which self-orders when cooling slows expansion down. Maybe the empty space in the next illustration is the empty remnant of a giant black hole that has shed its mass into a new beginning universe.
It makes sense to me. It is simple and elegant, but does have some speculative aspects. But until a better concept comes along I'll go with this as the most likely scenario.
It makes sense to many , but its wrong . Mathematical " elegance " is irrelevant . Some speculative aspects ? It is all speculative . BH . Mathematical Speculation . Thats it .
Moderator note: 48 off-topic posts have been moved to a new thread, here: Black hole multiverse cosmology and Write4U's mathematical universe Write4u has been warned (again) for posting more of his pet-topic spam to an unrelated thread.
James R post#635 Are you saying that mathematics is not the essence of the Universe ? If so I agree .
Black holes are great. So if I spin a ball on the floor and roll a marble into the ball the marble deflects right? So a large mass spinning light speed is gonna throw a planet like a baseball leaving the bat.
A black hole can be created if sufficient pressure is applied to a region of "empty" space. If you could build some device that generates somehow an inward spherical compression wave, you make a black hole. You don't actually need matter. Why it works, theoretically, is because gravity is in fact pressure. (ask John Baez if you don't believe me)
trevor: Remember what you were told about posting pseudoscientific nonsense? Stop it, please. I don't want to have to ask you again.