You may well derive some comfort from your being on somewhat the same page as Mr. John Horgan when it comes to the type of theories that fascinate me. https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...ew-theory-of-everything-is-the-same-old-crap/
Exactly, time cannot be synchronized, it is a result of duration of physical change. Note that metronomes have adjustable time rate slides which must match, else the metronome is unable to match the rate of duration of the other metronomes and acquire synchronicity. p.s. river, how do you account for the synchronized flashes of the fireflies. Nothing physical between them, yet they flash in perfect synchrony .
Not time slides , how does time " slide " . Metronomes get in synch through movements which passed to all others . Time had nothing to do with the synch .
OK, edited it to read "time rate". Move the weight up or down the slide to control the rate of time as set by the musician. Metronomes get in synch through movements which passed to all others . Time had nothing to do with the synch .[/QUOTE] Yes it does. The metronomes have adjustable time rates, not free variable time rates. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Metronome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metronome p.s. maybe of interest to musicians: https://www.metronomeonline.com/
Movement . Write4U response [/QUOTE] Yes it does. The metronomes have adjustable time rates, not free variable time rates. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Metronome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metronome p.s. maybe of interest to musicians: https://www.metronomeonline.com/ [/quote] And All these " time rates " are based on the Physical movements of the metronome . What started the metronome moving ? The physical .
Movement creates duration (time). So what does that tell you? Right, Time is created (emerges) along with duration of movement. By adjusting the metronome, the musician is setting the rate of time for his/her composition. Local time within Universal time.
↑ Yes but not time . To observers there is time . To objects there is duration based on the environment and their properties .
This may be of interest; Physicist Develops Software Solution to Measure Black Hole Stability https://scitechdaily.com/even-if-a-...l-model-it-doesnt-mean-it-exists-in-reality/#
Based on the physical . Duration is based on the physical movements of things . Do you think that the duration date matters to physical objects themselves ? Their movements . No . The beginning and end is dictated by the physical objects themselves . Dates are irrelevant .
To your last statement ; Because they are coming to the conclusion that the mathematics doesn't match observation . Galactic Jets for example . Which eject from both poles . Not one pole as black-hole theory would suggest .
I agree. Date and Time only have meaning to humans. All other organisms only experience duration, some of which maybe shortly remembered by living cells, some with long duration in brained animals, for purposes of migration, hibernation, mating, hunting , fruiting.
How do you know that what you are observing is located at the center of a galaxy. Remember, Galaxies are subject to dynamic distortion from a variety of external influences. Remember also that the light from pulsars may have been emitted 10 billions of years ago and the pulsar has since collapsed into black hole. Not saying that's how it happens but given the age of human science, galaxies are much older objects than our solar system, so what we see is no longer there. [quote[Most galaxies are between 10 billion and 13.6 billion years old. Our universe is about 13.8 billion years old, so most galaxies formed when the universe was quite young![/quote] https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/galaxies-age/en/