Why waste mind space managing an un necessary vocabulary...instead just say "It is late, God. God gonna God a God God in the God while God give the last God some God". Alex
Definition of god A anthropomorphic collection of everything outside of reality © Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
This formula does not say "mass is energy". It says the energy of a mass is equivalent to the mass times c squared. In other words, energy is a measured property of mass.
God is all-knowing... all-powerful... eternal... the creator of all thangs... judge an jury an perfect.!!! Perty simples really.!!!
So here we go amending reality to accommodate your fantasy...I didn't see that coming. Nor did I expect ignoring stuff like Dave's inconvenient observation that you are in effect talking nonsense. Well actually I saw both coming really so maybe you need to rethink your original definition and settle on something that won't see you tacking bits on as we go and feel free to rearrange the laws of physics seeing we are just playing make believe. Hope you have happy Easter holidays. Alex
If God is All Things, then certainly God is Energy too. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
While believers may believe an assortment of definitions on what God is, I think the most valid definition of God is as follows..... An unscientific supernatural/paranormal entity, dreamed up to explain the wonders of the universe around us, as well as us.
Just like a radiator is part of a car, all things can be part of God without encompassing everything it is to be God. A radiator is part of a car, but a car is more than the sum of its parts. So, at best, "all things" might be superfluous if he only means pantheism. No, a car is also a radiator, wheels, etc.. Saying "car and radiator" is not superfluous. You can readily say that a radiator, wheels, etc. are part of a car without implying that they are somehow separate from a car. Please, try to use everyday reasoning, instead of atheistic defensiveness.
Are you able to explain what you mean without reference to a car or anything else actually...you know what it is not what it's like. Alex
And I can grab that radiator and remove it. repair it, or throw it in the scrap heap and put a new one in. Your God concept has no such verification. Two aspects of brainwashing and fear of the finality of death, has in my opinion, lead man to keep clinging to that concept.
So you want a bare assertion, instead of any solid examples? I can't explain something an atheist has no basis to understand without reference to things they can. Yep, the car still exists, even when one of its parts do not. How does that verify a car, and who said God could be verified at all?
Yes I asked for... what it is ...not ...what is it like.... the implication being I don't want solid examples that detract from the fact you are explaining something not solid in the least. And you jump to conclusions for I am not an atheist or a theist but a realist, you know someone who expects before proceeding some reasonable confirmation that the subject matter has some basis in reality. However if your arrogance prevents you from using anything than metaphor, that one selects to make a mist seem solid, then I will not trouble you again and content myself in the knowledge that you ain't got nuttin... Alex
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Beware the double negative it an't no good Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You are kidding right??? Well perhaps we will have a difficult job pinning down anyone here specifically in this thread but to answer your question with a general observation ... every theist who mentions god and will argue until the cows come home that their god is absolutely verifiable with reference to various miracles and even frequent conversations with their god. Nevertheless you car example is useless...try harder. Alex