Would it be morally correct to let humanity to become extinct ? All questions have neuro dualism and diversity. There is options though , apply laws etc on child births etc , it wouldn't be a difficult job to cut down the population naturally by perhaps applying compulsive contraception etc . Wrong thread though for discussing climate change .
Ay, there's the rub! No, that's not morally correct. Neither is forced eugenics. So people come to a SUBJECTIVE (there's that word again) conclusion that you can't kill or sterilize people without their consent, because that feels wrong, and you wouldn't want it done to you. Tough when there's no objectively correct thing to do, eh? We were discussing eugenics, not climate change. (You know the difference, right?)
You mentioned global warming and reducing population . There is always an objective and moral answer to any problem . If an answer as not been found then we are not thinking good enough . Obviously it is morally wrong to kill people off but is it wrong to bring in laws that we need to prevent starvation and our extinction? Objectively no and educated correctly ,people would accept the idea .
You just gave an example where there was no objective and moral answer to a problem. It has been neuro thought of to death. No solution. Sounds like a problem that cannot be solved objectively! Ah yes. If the government would just indoctrinate educate people correctly, then they would see that the Final Solution is the only objectively valid path.
i am not going to play word games with a narcissistic troll playing a character to spread extremist propaganda. the troll plays the victim asserting my question to be invasive and the aggressor meanwhile the trolls plays the hapless victim just trying to discuss free speech and democracy ... are you attempting to target young gay sexually confused teenage boys ?
Science targets nothing but the truth . Your entire post is your own subjective interpretation, science needs no emotional response as emotions are subjective .
A self discipline that enables one to understand their own neurological functions and mechanisms . A realisation of neurological triggers that can cause thoughtless reactions , namely neurologic singularities . A pre selection method that defines the correct choice of var(x) of information from our neuro network of memories . The subject is vast , I think the book I'll write will be rather expansive .
troll speaks in the 3rd person while changing the subject and trying to pretend that the troll owns science...
objective penis subjective anus clench tightly to our babycheeses ... "no is just another way of saying yes"
Interesting psychology but again subjective . Perhaps you might consider gaining your own neuro control as you are not thinking or discussing the topic . I.e objectively you are trolling .
You are welcome , the dualism of neuro control of ourselves , is neuro control of others . This involves narcissism and various other things such as MK ultra neuro modulation .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism_(philosophy) "my objective is your subjectivity" "oh ! MY ! God! your soo natural !" all positions of control are the thread subject am i not being natural enough ? i thought you understood ? i asked you a question which you could wow people with an answer to... but you ignored it.
Do you put your feelings to one side when you consider your sexuality ? Back at you Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Feelings aside of course
Well I have to retain some material for my book . There is all sorts of twists and turns to be added but I do not mind sharing some basics in brief . If we jump to which will be the neurological maturity section , neurological maturity is not reached at twenty one years old , it is much later in life . Life experience accounting for wisdom gained , our immature minds are much more subjective .