BB is an incomplete theory . A System Universe is more complete.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by river, Mar 3, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Oh I know how science is done . Tow the line , of mainstream thinking .

    I wish I had followed a scientific career , but that wasn't in the cards , for me . And frankly I'm sure I would have been ridiculed anyway .

    In the end , I know that I will pass before my theory is proven to be true . We can't detect neither , dark energy nor matter . Barely the existence of the Cosmic Web . Yet I explain both . The Cosmic Web has been shown to exist , by using the energy from a Quasar .

    Whether I get credit . Time will tell .

    In the future someone will take my theory further .

    river
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Further we know that BB is not a theory that explains the existence of the Universe .

    my thinking is more complete . Upon this Universe

    Nothing has no place in any theory of this Universe . I proved this .

    Hence any theory of the Universe is based on something .
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Your theory is impossible to be proven right or even wrong. What are the mathematical predictions that scientists will find that will prove your points? Where are the equations that explain your ideas? Where are the equations that describe the properties of the so called "cosmic web", the equations of the filaments, etc?

    Do you understand why you don't even have a theory?

    For example, i might have a theory that time is matter. There is no theory at all, if i don't describe the equations that transform the one form to the other or their relationship.
    My idea has exactly the same status as a song that says" time is matter, yeah yeah ooh lala
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    To have any mathematical equation , you must first understand the physical dynamics of the idea .



    Time is the measurement of physical movement by energy and matter .

    Time though is irrelavent to any objects fundamental movement
     
  8. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    without mathematical descriptions, you dont have a theory, you dont have a model, not even a working hypothesis, or an argument. You only have an idea (that you personally think is interesting).

    And in science you dont get credit only for ideas
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    A theory must describe the physical , in my case , otherwise where do these mathematical descriptions begin ?

    Mathematics needs , is based on , direction . Where to start .
     
  10. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    physics is about the mathematical description of the universe. Without equations its not even description.
     
  11. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Yes it is , agreed

    The thing is though the physical , its self , has gone missing . Hence BB is really based on , nothing then something . Which is impossible .
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    For me , something always has been , the Universe in all its energy and matter forms , always existed
     
  13. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    I think so too.

    But then again this is my opinion. It has nothing to do with science
     
  14. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,864
    Chortle.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    But why do you think this though ? Why do you agree with my statement above ?

    Science is about knowledge , in Latin , scire , know

    In Archaic , meaning , And knowledge of any kind . Go back far enough , you will find that knowledge is knowledge . Science

    We are all doing science .
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    The Physical , energy and matter , exists without mathematics

    Mathematics can not exist without the physical .
     
  17. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    river:

    I was responding to your first post. You didn't explain why you think the big bang is 2 dimensional. So I asked you.

    No, it's not a substance. It's a number - an accounting system.

    Not necessarily. Maybe you're thinking of kinetic energy (which isn't a substance, either, by the way).

    That doesn't answer the question I asked you.

    How?

    It doesn't. Things aren't made of energy.
     
  18. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    True

    BB is two dimensional because it is point of energy .
     
  19. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    Wrong.

    A research scientist would like nothing better than to overturn "mainstream thinking" by making a marvellous new discovery.

    Where do you think new scientific knowledge comes from?

    You don't have a theory. You don't even have a testable hypothesis. All you have is a bunch of vague, unconnected notions about stuff you don't know much about.

    Really? Please provide a reference showing how the cosmic web has been shown to exist by using the energy of a quasar.

    Yes, you're right.

    No. Your thinking doesn't give us any handles we can grab onto in order to try to advance science. There's nothing testable. You can't even clearly define the terms you use, apparently.

    Great! Post your proof, please.
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    A point has zero dimensions.

    Why do you think a point of energy has two dimensions?
     
  21. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Because a point has length and breadth but no depth
     
  22. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,864
    A point has length...
     
  23. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Somebody is either trolling us or needs to go back to high school before revolutionizing physics
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page