Funny. White supremacist violence is a far bigger risk for the US today than the big bogeyman of the right - Islamic terrorism. And yet we need a travel ban to stop _them._
Welp, that's a lie. Does 9/11 ring a bell. The Pulse night club shooting? Ft. Hood? San Bernadino? Boston Marathon bombers? I'm sure I'm missing some. Trump was issuing a travel ban to the same 7 countries, that the Obama administration deemed to be terrorist states. The vast majority of Muslim countries were allowed to travel to the U.S. BTW, we have enough violence in this country with our own citizenry, especially in urban areas. Why should we import more violence from those 7 terrorists states and from Mexico and Central America?
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle. They also voted for W, which also moved the needle. And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle. Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit. Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary. They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.) And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Even including the original list of Muslim countries Trump tried to ban, they don't match the terrorism examples you posted. Here are the countries associated with the US terrorism you mentioned - 9/11, Pulse nightclub, Fort Hood, San Bernadino, Boston Marathon. 9/11: Saudi Arabia mostly, Egypt, UAE, Lebanon. Also involved: Afghanistan, Germany, Pakistan. Fort Hood: US born , Saudi-established mosque attendance, Palestinian parents. Pulse: US born, Afghan parents. San Bernadino: US born, Wahabi Sunni religious adherence, Pakistani parents // Pakistan born, lived in Saudi Arabia, educated in Pakistan. Boston: Kalmyk Province and Kyrgyzstan born, lived in Dagestan, identified as Chechen. None of those countries are on Trump's travel ban, original or amended version. Trump will probably never impose a travel ban on the most dangerous terrorism exporter of all - Saudi Arabia - because he does good business with them.
LOL. Talk about being in conflict with the dictionary, pertaining to "white supremacists". Being white and conservative doesn't make you a "white supremacist", retard.
My bad about the .00005 number. It's .0007. There's around 100K, give or take a few. I'm being generous. According to LW nutter Chelsea Handler, African American conservatives can be "white supremacists ". I could've included ALL adults of ALL ethnicities and the percentage would be lower, using her standard and logic. Lol. I never, ever met a white supremacist. I don't know anyone who knows a white supremacist and I know a lot of people. You might want to consult the SPLC. Even their definition of a white supremacist isn't most white conservatives. Here's a few links regarding the millions of Obama voters voting for Trump. http://www.centerforpolitics.org/cr...many-obama-2012-trump-2016-voters-were-there/ They say 13% which is approximately 8 million. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...a-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm. Vox says between 6.7-9.1 million Obama voters switched. The hilarious irony is that the article says in no uncertain terms, that these voters who voted for the first black president, voted for Trump because they're "racists ". Left wingers are so stupid. Lol.
Chortle. Irrelevant. My list of examples were meant to indicate, that Muslim terrorism kills more in the U.S. than white supremacists. That was the issue being discussed. You tried to get clever with nuance, but that's a no-go. Nuance is for those who can't argue the issues at face value. BTW , why didn't Bush and Obama list those countries as terrorist nations, that were home to those who committed terroristic acts against our nation, especially Saudi Arabia. Once again this all comes down to your Trump Derangement Syndrome. FTR, I think Trump is an arrogant buffoon, but you'd have to kill me before I'd vote for a modern day Dem. I'm quite certain after I die, I'll vote Dem for eternity. Chuckle.
Yeah, too bad about that. Vapid fallacy? As if that's new. What I don't understand about white supremacists is that if you think you're right, why do you try to convince everyone of something else?
First off low IQ, I'm not a white supremacist. Secondly, my data is backed up by the SPLC and CPUSA. Lastly, it is too bad, because none of you LW nut jobs can answer direct questions. All I wanted to know is why you low IQs believe that white supremacy has any impact at all? No one with more than two functioning brain cells, thinks it's an issue.
Assuming that that statement is true, what you should learn from it is that education in your hillbilly nation is inadequate.
Welp low IQ, it is true. The empirical data is from the New York Times. If you had any ounce of curiosity, you'd research it yourself. My guess is that you're too slothful. I agree that our educational system is inadequate. What else would you expect from the public school system? We need more private education, but pro choice progressives are anti-choice when it pertains to school choice. Despite those educational failures, we are still more innovate than any other nation on the planet. Why do foreigners come in droves to America, for higher education, if we're a hillbilly nation? That makes no fucking sense. A simple thanks would be in order, from you low IQ, ungrateful shitholers.
What's more pertinent is the fact that refugees flee your country. We have people coming to Canada, losing fingers and toes to frostbite, risking death, to escape from that idiot in the White House.
Great question. I agree that the global climate changes often. Since CO2 emissions are a big concern, what is your opinion of 1600 , overseas coal fired plants going online in the next 10 years, with over 700 of them being built by the Chinese government in China and other nations? China was supposed to be on board with lowering CO2 emmisions, yet they've increased. Trusting the Chinese and other third world despots regarding global climate change, is a fool's errand.
