All Vaccines are contaminated !

Okay - and what would you guess the chances are of the plane you are on being one that has a terrorist willing (and able) to blow the entire plane (and himself) on board?

Where, exactly, do you expect the plane to crash that you need a sidearm - the Amazon rain forest? That said, if it did, I would wager you (and most civilians) chances of surviving, after a plane crash that was severe enough to somehow prevent the plane from being located via the Black Box, for more than a few days in the wilderness is extraordinarily low.

You do realize that small single-engine prop planes, statistically, have FAR higher failure and fatality rates than large jetliners, right? Also, what's to stop that terrorist with a shoe bomb from being on the smaller aircraft?

I would agree- as we continue to live to older and older ages, we should be testing folks to ensure they are capable of driving. By the same token, I think a mandatory 5 year drivers test would be a wonderful thing - because it isn't just old folks that are dangerous, but all the rando's talking on their phone, driving intoxicated, distracted by a crying baby in the backseat, or otherwise utterly incapable of handling emergency situations (or even recovering from a fishtail).

I... don't think anyone has proposed a car with no manual controls as of yet, at least not to go into production for a long, long time.

Do you eat Corn of any sort? Or wheat? What about barley? Sugar? Tomatoes? Apples?

Yeah, then you are eating GMO's - they have all been selectively bread to increase desirable traits, have higher yield, and be more tolerant to disease and weather.

Except, for most people, we really don't. The unfortunate truth is that a small, but extremely vocal minority, do, in fact, believe that - and they shout it from the hilltops every chance they get.

Most people are inherently good given the option, statistically speaking. The problem in America is that we have cultivated our government and economic system to empower those most likely to abuse or consolidate power.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What is so hard about living in the woods for a few days? Long as it is not too cold, and water is nearby.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why would you need a pistol, if it's that easy?

Additionally -factor in the various (numerous) injuries yourself and others are likely to suffer. Even if you survived uninjured, would you be willing to let those who are simply die, or would you try to help them, often to your own detriment?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The odds of you being killed by a terrroist in your lifetime is approximately 1 in 45,000.

Odds of death from heart disease - 1 in 7. And yet you remain on the couch.
Odds of death from a motor vehicle accident - 1 in 113. And yet you drive and feel "safe."

That means your phobia is irrational. Which isn't a problem; you can do whatever you like. But if your irrational fears are impacting your life, there are plenty of mental health professionals who can help you with it.

You could charter an aircraft and fly if you like. You can bring your parachute and your guns. Heck, you can even take your emotional support donkey if you want, and it makes you calm enough to fly. Of course, your odds of death go up by a factor of 74, since general aviation is far more dangerous than commercial aviation. But if your parachute and your gun give you enough courage to fly, then you can still do it.

Your parachute will not help you in a crash, nor will your gun. So your rationalizations might be a pleasant fantasy, but I wouldn't waste too much time with them.

Or you could just get treatment for your phobias. That might be cheaper (and far safer) than chartering airplanes.

You can't "eject at any time."

That's probably one of your more benign phobias, since GMO's pose no more or less chance of poisoning you than any other food.

And you are an excellent example.

 

In your 2nd last statment you are wrong .

GMO's are are genetically modified foods . Roundup is in the food its self . Roundup is in the genetics of the food .

Hence you are injesting , in your body a poison .

 

Incorrect. GMO crops are Roundup RESISTANT, not Roundup producers.

River, your ignorance of everything from how Roundup-resistance crops work to what DHMO is often works against you. Why not learn about those things before posting about them?

 

And the resistance is in the genetics of the food itself , is the resistence to the bugs that attack the plant .

Roundup , is a poison , it genetically implanted in the plant it self .

Of which you consume .

 

What billvon said, with addition of this: Learn English, for God's sakes!

Commas , do not appear alone .

Nor do periods. "Itself" is one word, not two. How come you can get it once in a post, and then fuck it up again immediately in the same post?

Resistance and resistence , redisent ebbil . Basura, baboso.

Maybe if you could read and write people would take you more seriously.

 

No.

Roundup is an artificial herbicide that is made with glyphosphate. It kills almost every weed out there. Unfortunately, it also kills crops. So scientists modified certain crops to resist the effects of Roundup. GMO soybeans, for example, were one of the first crops that was modified so that Roundup couldn't kill it.

So farmers plant GMO soybeans. At this point they contain no Roundup. Then after a while weeds start to grow. The farmer then sprays with Roundup. This kills everything EXCEPT the GMO soybeans, which continue growing happily. At harvest time there are only soybeans - no weeds.

The soybean does not produce Roundup. The soybean merely RESISTS Roundup. That's why they are called Roundup resistant soybeans, and not Roundup soybeans.

Now, I did all that work for you. Now it is your turn. What is DHMO, the evil substance that twice now you have said must be removed from vaccines for our own good?

 

River eats too much soy.

I think he might believe that his gynecomastia is caused by water.

 

You are not fully informed .

Round-up is in the genetics of the the plant .

That's what makes the plant a GMO .

 

Apparently you aren't fully informed either. Blame your English teacher. Ask saint to define "idiot" for you.

 

GMO's are what they are .

Genetically Modified organisms .

 

My point is made.

 

You made no point

 

That has to one of the silliest things I've read today. It's amazing the things you say when you forego an education.

 

From MIT:

"Roundup Ready crops are crops genetically modified to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup."
http://web.mit.edu/demoscience/Monsanto/about.html

You lose.

No. GMO means genetically modified organism. Again, nothing to do with Roundup.

Have you learned what DHMO is yet?

 

He'll forget it in a minute anyway. Why bother?

 

OK River - enough is enough.

Firstly) Provide proof that Round-up is "in the genetics of the plant". Otherwise, you are simply repeatedly stating unfounded (and patently false) claims.

Secondly) Answer the question that has been posed to you multiple times about what this terrible DHMO that "must be removed" is, and how you propose we remove it from everything.

 

Round-up is NOT in the genetics of the plant , my mistake . However this means though that Round-up can be sprayed , liberally on the crop . Hence , your food is saturated with this herbicide .

Just ban DHMO , period .