How to hunt Bigfoot in Washington State

You have one claim that the recordings were not altered. No, that is not scientific. Science is repeatable. Submit those recordings to be tested independently.

And even if the recordings themselves have not been tampered with, that's no indication that human voices weren't altered/distorted to make the recordings. You're hanging way too much on one claim to be anywhere near scientific.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No...one scientific analysis is sufficient to prove the origin of the noises. There is no rule for multiple opinions in science.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What part of "repeatable" do you not understand?

No, one analysis is never enough. In a situation involving an exceptional claim like a new species, a hundred analyses is not enough - because the authenticity of the recording does not point irrevocably to the conclusion of Bigfoot.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes it is. That's why we call it expert analysis.

 

You won't find many Nobel Prizes being awarded for one analysis.

 

Yeah, that doesn't bother you, probably the only reality you do accept.

 

You won't find many Nobel Prizes awarded for Bigfoot discovery either. Why is that?

 

There's no such animal. Hard to award for work done on nonsense.