My only point was that most little boys go through a period of thinking girls have "cooties". (And vice versa.) There is an age at which most people are too young to have any ideas about sexual orientation. Having said that, I think we all knew kids when we were growing up that seemed a little "different". I don't know how old they were when they figured out what that difference was.
Just like breeders have to have the term explained to them. Does that make you wonder how the first breeder had to have it explained to him?
Well, if XX is the biological default .... Actually, let's try it this way, because I don't actually know the answer: Do nonhuman primate females present evidence of penis envy?
Again - unless they are a shut-in (with no media input), or raised by wolves, this is moot. There is, in practice, no such society where heterosexuality is not present. I think that is a small fraction of the range of possibilities. I'm not really comfortable with the phrase "a little homo". Shades of homophobia there.
uh. This isn't because a girl gets the guy simply because they're a girl? That shit can be kind of scary; resenting females and all that.
Don't see how that's true. If everyone (or nearly everyone) around you is doing one - or an uncountable number of things - just like you (breathing, eating, liking the opposite sex), then there would be no explanation needed. ("Huh. He's breathing, and so am I!")
Well, sure it is. Ask someone heterosexual if they are a breeder and they will likely look at you blankly, and perhaps say "you mean a dog breeder?" Only when you explain that that's a term sometimes applied to heterosexuals will they understand it. Before that, they just thought they liked the opposite sex. Of course, learning a new term has exactly zero to do with one's sexual orientation.
Still, I'm kinda curious what the OP's agenda is. He hypothesizes that homosexuals are - with rare exception - told that they are homosexuals. He calls them 'little homos'. Not that I want to borrow trouble, but those would be consistent with a homophobe trying to make a case.
My point was that, when everyone is doing the same thing, it doesn't occur to you what a given thing might "be". Like breathing. You don't say "Huh. Everyone is breathing, and I'm a breather too."
Don't blame me for having fear. It's in the media every day: https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08/asia/indonesia-cave-shaman-intl/index.html
Fear of what? How did we get from a maturing child questioning his sexuality to serial killers and kidnappers?
What? No. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I like you. I'm trying to follow your train of thought. You're kinda touchy...
Yes. I am touchy. I can get scared very easy. This is something my friends pointed out as an abnormality. This is silly. Maybe the OP can't get laid (to put it blunt). :EDIT: And I don't know if the OP is made by a sock puppet.
Apologies. I will keep that in mind. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I, on the other hand, am known for all too often offending people with my off-putting sense of humour. Indeed. I am curious as to his/her agenda.
i think they are trolling the neg to the moot of what-if as a view on society. getting ready to set up an alternate question they have. which they really should get on and post
the predators view on sexuality is the freedom of prey to be had by its willingness is like a nirvana unfound. a bit of an echoe running though maybe.