Hello. I've recently noticed the ineffectiveness of language. One person speaks while the other listens, and so on. Language seems ineffective because both people cannot speak at the same time. Perhaps some form of "bathing" telemetry would be more successful?
I think he's essentially noting that the human brain has limited processing power. Forming/transmitting an idea // receiving/comprehending an idea are processor-intensive tasks, each requiring the brain's virtually undivided attention. It has nothing to do with inventing a 2-way simultaneous communication system - we already have that: our ears and mouth can both operate simultaneously. It's the brain that's the bottleneck. You'd have to rewire the brain to have two processing centres.
Most people in an animated conversation hear only the first sentence and then switch to formulating a rebuttal, just waiting for a break. The mark of a good negotiator isto listen, fully, to what the other person is saying, before formulating a response.
A bad language doesn't matter as long as two people understand each other well. I guess that will make sense.
imho language is a relative shadow of reality in the morning it heads one way, and another in the evening and then we have artificial light which sends the poor shadow every which way
Well, I once listened to 40,000 people cheering at a concert. I guess there's no practical upper limit.