You have not explained it simple. You have not explained anything that makes any sense! This is a simple explanation: Apples are red because the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Very simple but nonsense. Because a 'light sphere that is a mono pole positive polarity' is a made up term which is meaningless. Did I win?
Here we go, if i have not learnt, how am I able to discuss matrix's and Cartesian coordinate systems ?
An electron is an electron only because of the proton, a proton is a proton only because of the electron. One cannot exist without the other.
Yeah this is nuts - I am running an experiment and this is how I am wasting my time until I get to a point that the parts are ready measure...Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You are not discussing these things. You are using the terms but you are not stringing them together into meaningful sentences.
A drying experiment for ceramic product. I think I need to decrease the kinetic excitement... (I assume you meant translational kinetic energy).
I don's say so, my matrix and the laws of Physics suggests so. It is an opinion based on information . Likewise polarities repulse is a fact, evident and proven. A matrix of only likewise polarity can not retain it's form without a mechanism to do so. What is true for (a) is also true for (b) in that either signed pole cannot individually retain form. However when both empty matrix's appear simultaneously at the same location point of space, both matrix's can retain form and exist.
I consider that when atoms interact with energy the consequence action is excitement in the form of they vibrate more? An increase in friction creating the heat?
No. The temperature of an object is a measure of the translational kinetic energy of the atoms in the material. The vibrations do not make heat. The vibration IS the temperature. The transfer of vibrational energy from the higher temperature material to a lower temperature material is what we call heat. And with that I am off to make my measurements and I can already see that the results are not what I desired. It was ever thus....
You obvious don't understand that Captain America loves Wonder Woman not Supergirl and the formula explain how Wonder Woman's invisible jet gets its properties and as per Origin Don't you just love psychoscience? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
ƒ: a→b ƒ: b→a g:R³→R Can you understand this? I am watching Khan on matrix's and linear algebra, it seems over complicating , what is a transformation exactly?
A=4*4 AAAA AAAA AAAA AAAA A1 top right AT=transpose = AAAA AAAA AAAA AAAA Have I just flipped Matrix A? A1 would now be bottom left? ƒ: a→b transpose to ƒ: a.b mean anything?
After a quick google search , I think you said it is nonsense, so back to the ''drawing board'' and maybe a different approach to my learning experience. Input Matrix A 0000 0000 0000 0000 Input Matrix B 0000 0000 0000 0000 Output Matrix C 1111 1111 1111 1111 Do you understand this? How about df <- do.call(cbind, split(x, c("positive","negative")))? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9508773/converting-one-column-of-data-into-two-columns-in-r?rq=1
Well, there might be some hope. But you've been watching a video on matrices and linear algebra. Matrix algebra and linear algebra are kind of the same thing, at least in a Euclidean space. In physics, every space has a Hilbert space associated with it, Hilbert spaces are more general than Euclidean spaces. And sure, there a a lot of programming languages that handle matrices and operations on them. Try writing a program that can handle a permutation group (like for a deck of cards, say). If you think linear algebra is complicated, try this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_space
Thank you for your link , I had not heard of Hilbert space. How do I describe an isotropic transformation (T) of an empty matrix (a) across an open space K , ? T(a)=λa/K? eigenvectors of a? aX,Y,Z = λX,Y,Z or aX,Y,Z=λn? or mapped ƒ:a→n? ƒ:[]→[n]? n being n-dimensional