Defies reason!!?? It would seem the commentator (and thus MR) have lived in a 2-dimensional world their whole lives. For Pete's sake. One disappears behind the other. You can actually see where the "larger" one eclipses the "smaller" one. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Shame the video stops right there, isn't it? I guess the film editor didn't feel that the next couple of frames (where the farther one re-emerges from behind the nearer one) would be of any interest to analysts... This is an excellent example of manipulation of narrative for the purpose of sensationalisation.
Credulous, you mean. You won't discuss it with anybody who is sceptical. Do you have any videos of actual UFOs? Poor quality videos of uncertain provenance cut so as to give a false impression speak for themselves. Videos that show objects that could be any number of things speak for themselves. Faked videos speak for themselves. But to hear what any of them are saying, you must first open your mind.
↑ No , James R Just Won't discuss with anyone who has not read up on the topic . At least some what . Quote a page in a book etc.
What you mean is "Won't discuss with anyone who has not read up on the topic - and come to the same conclusions as you.
If you're going to bump a thread over a year old, add some personal commentary and not just a link, please.
Great assuming Never did get a answer re helicopter incident moving from 0 to 600 klm and back to 0 in a couple of seconds Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Actually that is the only one of your post i find credible Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I've seen that type of merging many times Very very briefly you see the trailing aircraft (yes I am going to call it a aircraft) raise up and later dip down and merge Spent a bit of time looking for a suitable refueling mid air video but couldn't find one out of focus and grainey enough to convince MR it was a authentic alien spacecraft Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Not convinced , don't actually care . The only thing that really matters is evidence , and when investigated by people who actually have a real solid interest in this subject , thinking becomes knowing .
Then there is nothing for you to add , so why bother responding since it's , " pseudo knowing " ? The difference between thinking and knowing , is that thinking does not know , knowing , is about information .
Not surprised But I am surprised you can't figure it out . Tough beans though , its not complicated at all , so figure it out . My post#156 is really quite easy .