Fringe subforum

Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by birch, Nov 7, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Certainly, you have the "right" to post whatever you wish. That does not exempt you from the consequences when you choose to violate the forum rules. You know, the very same rules you agreed to abide by when you registered.

    So you admit your beliefs are nonscientific. Thank you.

    Much the same as jumping out of an aircraft without a parachute because you don't believe in gravity won't save you from a messy end, ignoring the rules here because you claim you disagree with them will not exempt you from their enforcement.

    Thus, when you post something and claim it to be true, then choose to simply ignore evidence you don't like because it doesn't result in your desired conclusion, demand ever higher standards of evidence from others while providing little to none of your own, and generally act like a street corner preacher... well, it should come as no surprise when points are issued. After all, one wouldn't pass an officer doing 90 in a 25 and expect to be left alone.

    Yes, your record does rather speak for itself.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,600
    This from the moderator who has infracted me so many times without justification that his actions have been overruled by James R and Bells.


    Just like your beliefs Christian.

    I have never violated any rules by simple posting evidence of the paranormal and ufos and you know it. It's always moderators making up new shit to get me banned. Every time.

    You're the ones who deny the photo, video and eyewitness evidence I post and preach your gospel of infallible science. By your own standards you should all be issued points.


    As does your record of having bans and infractions reversed by James R and Bells.
     
    cluelusshusbund likes this.
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    This from the member who continually defies the rules, even when advised by James R that continuing to do so would result in infractions.

    I never claimed my personal religious beliefs were scientific, nor did I try to force them on anyone else as truth.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    I guess we should all be thankful that you aren't a moderator, then.

    I guess time will tell

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    By the way - still waiting for you to support your shameful accusation against DaveC... or was that just more of your usual bluster?
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,600
    Do I really need to quote your ridiculous arguments for Noah's ark and the worldwide flood? lol!
     
    cluelusshusbund likes this.
  8. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    *shrug* I've no concerns about what I've said, though it is bemusing that you have made this thread entirely about you.

    If you wish to introduce yet another entirely off topic rant, I'd recommend you create a thread for it in the appropriate subforum.
     
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    How novel. Another thread, driven off the rails by Magical Realist's complaining about his treatment.

    :unsub:
     
  10. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,549
    Which does give it some uniqueness.
     
  11. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Seems that way.
     
  12. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
  13. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    Its a shame thar ant some sort of rule that woud help prevent people from runin threds off the rails

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,600
    Always takes more than one to "run a thread off the rails."
     
  15. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    "Always" is a dangerous word. There have been some members who were perfectly capable of derailing even their own threads themselves, when they were the only one posting to it.
     
  16. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    From the example i just saw... when a thred is off the rails its administratons duty to keep it off the rails

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Magical Realist likes this.
  17. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Mod Note

    This thread is no longer even remotely discussing what the thread topic aimed to try to discuss. Since certain members have decided, yet again, to hijack a thread because they have an ax to grind against staff and have derailed this thread, this thread is now closed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page